Find the Macaulay duration and the modified duration of a 15-year, 9.0% corporate bond priced to yield 7.0%. According to the modified duration of this bond, how much of a price change would this bond incur if market yields rose to 8.0%? Using annual compounding, calculate the price of this bond in one year if rates do rise to 8.0%. How does this price change compare to that predicted by the modified duration? Explain the difference. The Macaulay duration is nothing years. (Round to two decimal places.) The modified duration is nothing years. (Round to two decimal places.) If market yields rose to 8.0%, the change would be nothing%. (Round to two decimal places.) Using annual compounding, the price of this bond in 1 year if rates do rise to 8.0% is $nothing. (Round to the nearest cent.) The actual percentage change in bond price is nothing%. (Round to two decimal places.) Which of the following is true? (Select the best choice below.) A. Duration is a good predictor of price volatility if rates change less than 2%. B. Duration is not a good predictor of price volatility if interest rates undergo a big swing because of the convex relationship of a bond's price-yield relationship. C. Duration is a good predictor of price volality because of the convex relationship of a bond's price-yield relationship. D. Duration is not a good predictor of price volatility if rates change more than a basis point. Click to select your answer(s).
Find the Macaulay duration and the modified duration of a 15-year, 9.0% corporate bond priced to yield 7.0%. According to the modified duration of this bond, how much of a price change would this bond incur if market yields rose to 8.0%? Using annual compounding, calculate the price of this bond in one year if rates do rise to 8.0%. How does this price change compare to that predicted by the modified duration? Explain the difference. The Macaulay duration is nothing years. (Round to two decimal places.) The modified duration is nothing years. (Round to two decimal places.) If market yields rose to 8.0%, the change would be nothing%. (Round to two decimal places.) Using annual compounding, the price of this bond in 1 year if rates do rise to 8.0% is $nothing. (Round to the nearest cent.) The actual percentage change in bond price is nothing%. (Round to two decimal places.) Which of the following is true? (Select the best choice below.) A. Duration is a good predictor of price volatility if rates change less than 2%. B. Duration is not a good predictor of price volatility if interest rates undergo a big swing because of the convex relationship of a bond's price-yield relationship. C. Duration is a good predictor of price volality because of the convex relationship of a bond's price-yield relationship. D. Duration is not a good predictor of price volatility if rates change more than a basis point. Click to select your answer(s).
Essentials Of Investments
11th Edition
ISBN:9781260013924
Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Chapter1: Investments: Background And Issues
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1PS
Related questions
Question
Find the Macaulay duration and the modified duration of a
15-year,
9.0%
corporate bond priced to yield
7.0%.
According to the modified duration of this bond, how much of a price change would this bond incur if market yields rose to
8.0%?
Using annual compounding, calculate the price of this bond in one year if rates do rise to
8.0%.
How does this price change compare to that predicted by the modified duration? Explain the difference.The Macaulay duration is
nothing
years. (Round to two decimal places.)The modified duration is
nothing
years. (Round to two decimal places.)If market yields rose to
8.0%,
the change would be
nothing%.
(Round to two decimal places.)Using annual compounding, the price of this bond in 1 year if rates do rise to
8.0%
is
$nothing.
(Round to the nearest cent.)The actual percentage change in bond price is
nothing%.
(Round to two decimal places.)Which of the following is true? (Select the best choice below.)
Duration is a good predictor of price volatility if rates change less than 2%.
Duration is not a good predictor of price volatility if interest rates undergo a big swing because of the convex relationship of a bond's price-yield relationship.
Duration is a good predictor of price volality because of the convex relationship of a bond's price-yield relationship.
Duration is not a good predictor of price volatility if rates change more than a basis point.
Click to select your answer(s).
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 2 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, finance and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Essentials Of Investments
Finance
ISBN:
9781260013924
Author:
Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:
Mcgraw-hill Education,
Essentials Of Investments
Finance
ISBN:
9781260013924
Author:
Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:
Mcgraw-hill Education,
Foundations Of Finance
Finance
ISBN:
9780134897264
Author:
KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. William
Publisher:
Pearson,
Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou…
Finance
ISBN:
9781337395250
Author:
Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i…
Finance
ISBN:
9780077861759
Author:
Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan Professor
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education