Fill in the blanks in the following proof, which shows that the sequence defined by the recurrence relation fk = fx-1+ 2k for each integer k 2 2 1 = 1 satisfies the following formula. f, = 2" +1- 3 for every integer n 2 1 Proof (by mathematical induction): Suppose f,, f2, f3 is a sequence that satisfies the recurrence relation 1' ... Ik = k + 2k for each integer k 2 2, with initial condition f, = 1. We need to show that when the sequence f,, f,, f3, ... is defined in this recursive way, all the terms in the sequence also satisfy the explicit formula shown above. So let the property P(n) be the equation f, = 2" +1 - 3. We will show that P(n) is true for every integer n 2 1. Show that P(1) is true: The left-hand side of P(1) is which equals The right-hand side of P(1) is Since the left-hand
Fill in the blanks in the following proof, which shows that the sequence defined by the recurrence relation fk = fx-1+ 2k for each integer k 2 2 1 = 1 satisfies the following formula. f, = 2" +1- 3 for every integer n 2 1 Proof (by mathematical induction): Suppose f,, f2, f3 is a sequence that satisfies the recurrence relation 1' ... Ik = k + 2k for each integer k 2 2, with initial condition f, = 1. We need to show that when the sequence f,, f,, f3, ... is defined in this recursive way, all the terms in the sequence also satisfy the explicit formula shown above. So let the property P(n) be the equation f, = 2" +1 - 3. We will show that P(n) is true for every integer n 2 1. Show that P(1) is true: The left-hand side of P(1) is which equals The right-hand side of P(1) is Since the left-hand
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
Related questions
Concept explainers
Unitary Method
The word “unitary” comes from the word “unit”, which means a single and complete entity. In this method, we find the value of a unit product from the given number of products, and then we solve for the other number of products.
Speed, Time, and Distance
Imagine you and 3 of your friends are planning to go to the playground at 6 in the evening. Your house is one mile away from the playground and one of your friends named Jim must start at 5 pm to reach the playground by walk. The other two friends are 3 miles away.
Profit and Loss
The amount earned or lost on the sale of one or more items is referred to as the profit or loss on that item.
Units and Measurements
Measurements and comparisons are the foundation of science and engineering. We, therefore, need rules that tell us how things are measured and compared. For these measurements and comparisons, we perform certain experiments, and we will need the experiments to set up the devices.
Topic Video
Question
(Discrete Math)
Please fill in the blanks
box you answers and write neatly
thank you!
![Fill in the blanks in the following proof, which shows that the sequence defined by the recurrence relation
fk = fk
+ 2k for each integer k 2 2
- 1
= 1
satisfies the following formula.
f, = 2" +1 - 3 for every integer n 2 1
Proof (by mathematical induction):
Suppose f,, f2, f31
... is a sequence that satisfies the recurrence relation
f = fk -1+ 2* for each integer k 2 2, with initial condition f, = 1.
We need to show that when the sequence f,, f,, f3, ... is defined in this recursive way, all the terms in the sequence also satisfy the
explicit formula shown above.
So let the property P(n) be the equation f, = 2" +1 - 3. We will show that P(n) is true for every integer n 2 1.
Show that P(1) is true:
The left-hand side of P(1) is
which equals
. The right-hand side of P(1) is
. Since the left-hand
and right-hand sides equal each other, P(1) is true.
Show that for each integer k 2 1, if P(k) is true, then P(k + 1) is true:
Let k be any integer with k 2 1, and suppose that P(k) is true. In other words, suppose that f =
, where f,, f2, f3, ... is
a sequence defined by the recurrence relation
f = fx-1+ 2k for each integer k > 2, with initial condition f, = 1.
[This is the inductive hypothesis.]
We must show that P(k + 1) is true. In other words, we must show that
Now the left-hand side of P(k + 1) is
+ 1
fk + 1
k + 2k + 1
by definition of f, f, f, .'
2k + 1
by inductive hypothesis
+
= 2 .
by the laws of algebra
and this is the right-hand side of P(k + 1). Hence the inductive step is complete.
[Thus, both the basis and the inductive steps have been proved, and so the proof by mathematical induction is complete.]](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F3b3df428-2a91-49dd-84ab-611ffd39f8ca%2Fba5955e9-c070-434c-ab16-75f534fb7af7%2Fm8se1lj_processed.png&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:Fill in the blanks in the following proof, which shows that the sequence defined by the recurrence relation
fk = fk
+ 2k for each integer k 2 2
- 1
= 1
satisfies the following formula.
f, = 2" +1 - 3 for every integer n 2 1
Proof (by mathematical induction):
Suppose f,, f2, f31
... is a sequence that satisfies the recurrence relation
f = fk -1+ 2* for each integer k 2 2, with initial condition f, = 1.
We need to show that when the sequence f,, f,, f3, ... is defined in this recursive way, all the terms in the sequence also satisfy the
explicit formula shown above.
So let the property P(n) be the equation f, = 2" +1 - 3. We will show that P(n) is true for every integer n 2 1.
Show that P(1) is true:
The left-hand side of P(1) is
which equals
. The right-hand side of P(1) is
. Since the left-hand
and right-hand sides equal each other, P(1) is true.
Show that for each integer k 2 1, if P(k) is true, then P(k + 1) is true:
Let k be any integer with k 2 1, and suppose that P(k) is true. In other words, suppose that f =
, where f,, f2, f3, ... is
a sequence defined by the recurrence relation
f = fx-1+ 2k for each integer k > 2, with initial condition f, = 1.
[This is the inductive hypothesis.]
We must show that P(k + 1) is true. In other words, we must show that
Now the left-hand side of P(k + 1) is
+ 1
fk + 1
k + 2k + 1
by definition of f, f, f, .'
2k + 1
by inductive hypothesis
+
= 2 .
by the laws of algebra
and this is the right-hand side of P(k + 1). Hence the inductive step is complete.
[Thus, both the basis and the inductive steps have been proved, and so the proof by mathematical induction is complete.]
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 3 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, advanced-math and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
