(Figure: The Quantity of Pollution in Coal Production) Use Figure: The Quantity of Pollution in Coal Production. Whethis economy produces 50 tons of emissions:MSB, MSC20015010050MSB200Quantity of pollutionemisions (tons)it is producing below the socially optimal level of output.the marginal social cost equals the marginal social benefit.it is producing at its socially optimal level of output.the marginal social cost is greater than the marginal social benefit.050MSC100 150

The optimal quantity is where the marginal social benefit is equal to the marginal social cost.…

(Figure: The Quantity of Pollution in Coal Production) Use Figure: The Quantity of Pollution in Coal Production. Who this economy produces 50 tons of emissions: MSB, MSC 200 150 100 50 0 50 MSC MSB 200 Quantity of pollution emisions (tons) 100 150 it is producing below the socially optimal level of output. the marginal social cost equals the marginal social benefit. it is producing at its socially optimal level of output. the marginal social cost is greater than the marginal social benefit.

(Figure: The Quantity of Pollution in Coal Production) Use Figure: The Quantity of Pollution in Coal Production. Who this economy produces 50 tons of emissions: MSB, MSC 200 150 100 50 0 50 MSC MSB 200 Quantity of pollution emisions (tons) 100 150 it is producing below the socially optimal level of output. the marginal social cost equals the marginal social benefit. it is producing at its socially optimal level of output. the marginal social cost is greater than the marginal social benefit.

Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Course List)

7th Edition

ISBN:9781285165875

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter10: Externalities

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5QCMC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A city currently emits 15 million gallons (MG) of raw sewage into a lake that is beside the city. Table 12.13 shows the total costs (TC) in thousands of dollars of cleaning up the sewage to different levels, together with the total benefits (TB) of doing so. Benefits include environmental, recreational, health, and industrial benefits. Using the information in Table 12.13 calculate the marginal costs and marginal benefits of reducing sewage emissions for this City. What is the optimal level of sewage for this city? How can you tell?
An emissions tax on a quantity of emissions from a film is not a command-and-control approach to reducing pollution. Why?
(Figure: The Quantity of Pollution in Coal Production) Use Figure: The Quantity of Pollution in Coal Production. The amount of a Pigouvian tax required to bring the market to the socially optimal level of pollution emissions is: MSB, MSC 200 150 100 50 100. 50. 150. 0. 0 50 100 MSC MSB 150 200 Quantity of pollution emisions (tons)
This graph represents the tobacco industry. IPrice 16 14 Social Cost 12 10 Private Cost 8 6 4 Demand 200 500 650 Quantity a) Without any government intervention, what is the market determined price and quantity? b) What is the price of the externality? c) What is the socially optimal price and quantity? d) What should the government do (impose a tax or provide a subsidy) to internalize this externality? What is the amount of the the corrective tax/subsidy needed to be to move the outcome from the market equilibrium to the socially-optimal outcome?
QUESTION 10 Which of the following types of firms are likely to respond to a corrective tax by reducing their pollution emissions? a. Firms with high abatement costs b. Firms that love the environment c. Firms that want a boost to their public image d. Firms with low abatement costs
(Figure: The Socially Optimal Quantity of Pollution II) In the accompanying figure, without government intervention: Figure: The Socially Optimal Quantity of Pollution II Marginal social cost, marginal social benefit Marginal social cost, MŠC, of pollution Marginal social benefit, MSB, of pollution Quantity of pollution emissions (tons) OA. firms will continue to pollute until the marginal social benefit is zero. OB. firms will continue to pollute until the marginal social benefit is $200. OC. the optimal quantity of pollution will occur. OD. none of the above
(Figure: Efficiency and Pollution in the Market for Vehicle Emissions) Use Figure: Efficiency and Pollution in the Market for Vehicle Emissions. Assume that firms are the only beneficiaries of pollution and that costs are borne solely by others in the society. The socially optimal quantity of pollution is ____ tons.
Macmillan Learning The accompanying graph depicts the marginal social cost (MSC) and marginal social benefit (MSB) of pollution emissions. Move the point, P, to the point representing the optimal level of pollution. What is the optimal quantity of pollution? metric tons The optimal quantity of pollution is not zero because: 1,000 Dollars 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 27 2 P 3 4 5 6 Metric tons of pollution 7 8 9 MSC MSB 10
QUESTION 18 Which of the following are potential efficient solutions to a pollution negative externality? Private bargaining ✓Lawsuits Pigovian taxes Social Media Campaigns Pigovian subsidies Cap and Trade
(Figure: The Socially Optimal Quantity of Emissions from Coal Production) Use Figure The Socialy Optimal Quarety of Emissions from Coal Production in the figure, firms are the only beneficiaries of polution, and costs are borne solely by others in the society. Without government intervention Marginal social cost, marginal social benefit MSC of pollution MSB of pollution Quantity of pollution emissions (tons) O The outcome cannot be determined without more information Orms will continue to polute until the marginal benefit to them is $200 O firms will continue to pollute until the marginal benate to them is zero. O the quantity of pollution will be optimal.
2 The equation for the marginal cost of reductions is P=1+R*2 The equation for the marginal benefit of reductions is P=33-R*2 What is the Pigouvian tax for this pollutant? How much pollution would exist if that Pigouvian tax was charged?
22. Discuss the benefits and drawbacks associated with using a corrective tax to control pollution.