Eyeglassomatic manufactures eyeglasses for different retailers. They test to see how many defective lenses they made in a given time period and found that 10% of all lenses had defects of some type. Looking at the type of defects, they found in a three-month time period that out of 34,024 defective lenses, 5840 were due to scratches. Are there more defects from scratches than from all other causes? State the Type I and Type II errors in this case. State the Type I error. Concluding that the proportion of defects from scratches is 10%, when in reality it is less than 10%. Concluding that the proportion of defects from scratches is 10%, when in reality it is higher than 10%. Concluding that the proportion of defects from scratches is less than 10%, when the proportion is actually 10%. Concluding that the proportion of defects from scratches is higher than 10%, when the proportion is actually 10%. State the Type II error. Concluding that the proportion of defects from scratches is 10%, when in reality it is less than 10%. Concluding that the proportion of defects from scratches is 10%, when in reality it is higher than 10%. Concluding that the proportion of defects from scratches is higher than 10%, when the proportion is actually 10%. Concluding that the proportion of defects from scratches is less than 10%, when the proportion is actually 10%.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

Eyeglassomatic manufactures eyeglasses for different retailers. They test to see how many defective lenses they made in a given time period and found that 10% of all lenses had defects of some type. Looking at the type of defects, they found in a three-month time period that out of 34,024 defective lenses, 5840 were due to scratches. Are there more defects from scratches than from all other causes? State the Type I and Type II errors in this case.

State the Type I error.

Concluding that the proportion of defects from scratches is 10%, when in reality it is less than 10%.
Concluding that the proportion of defects from scratches is 10%, when in reality it is higher than 10%.
Concluding that the proportion of defects from scratches is less than 10%, when the proportion is actually 10%.
Concluding that the proportion of defects from scratches is higher than 10%, when the proportion is actually 10%.

State the Type II error.

Concluding that the proportion of defects from scratches is 10%, when in reality it is less than 10%.
Concluding that the proportion of defects from scratches is 10%, when in reality it is higher than 10%.
Concluding that the proportion of defects from scratches is higher than 10%, when the proportion is actually 10%.
Concluding that the proportion of defects from scratches is less than 10%, when the proportion is actually 10%.

Expert Solution