explain whether or not you feel Ford did anything morally wrong in weighing the economics of the Pinto manufacturing versus consumer deaths. Also, do you think it was a legitimate defense for Ford to state that their cars met or exceeded the safety standards set by the US government?
explain whether or not you feel Ford did anything morally wrong in weighing the economics of the Pinto manufacturing versus consumer deaths. Also, do you think it was a legitimate defense for Ford to state that their cars met or exceeded the safety standards set by the US government?
"An indicator of wide legitimate, social-underlying, and philosophical shifts... driving an expanded intolerance of middle-class wrongdoing," according to the Ford Pinto case. It's far from an ideal example of middle-class misconduct, in which financial gain takes precedence above moral considerations. Adapting human existence to the end goal of a money-saving advantages examination necessitates ethical reflection, as life is valuable and cannot be reduced to financial terms without dehumanizing people as customers whose sole purpose is to generate income to fuel an economy that is intended to serve society as a means of allowing specialization and exchange to improve personal satisfaction. Increasing social advancement through individual growth rather than social addition has resulted in the loss of many lives. The facts show that profit allows companies to provide improvements and extravagances, boosting the quality of life for individuals; nevertheless, if profit is our only worry, we consider the buyers who fuel the economy as accessible gold mines to be exploited rather than served.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
