Explain following definitions Whistleblower, Responsibility center , Lagging, KPI, Performance management system, KPI, Strategy
Q: List the features that when present are more likely to result in an effective performance management…
A: An effective performance management system typically includes the following features: Clear and…
Q: How do you describe the BYOD trend and how it affects a business in terms of system analytics?
A: BYOD stands for Bring Your Own Device. It means allowing employees to use their own personal…
Q: how to apply the balanced scorecard.
A: A Balanced Scorecard management performance metric is used to identify and improve different…
Q: Briefly explain two (2) potential pitfalls encountered in the design of performance indicators and…
A: The following are two potential hazards in the design of performance indicators and measurement…
Q: Why is it important to develop causal links between performance measures in strategic performance…
A: In order for businesses to keep track of and evaluate their progress toward achieving their…
Q: Which elements of management are related to a BSC (Balanced Scorecard)?
A: In order to continuously enhance strategic performance and outcomes, a balanced scorecard (BSC) is a…
Q: Company ZYX is a small consulting organization with 40 employees. The manager who is responsible for…
A: Performance appraisals are systematic approaches to assessing whether employees have performed…
Q: Describe and explain what effect does quality management have on productivity
A: Quality management is a technique for regulating or preserving the integrity of a company in order…
Q: Develop a balanced scorecard that the dean of the college could use to evaluate the college’s…
A: A balanced scorecard is a strategic management tool that aids in performance measurement and goal…
Q: In the balanced scorecard what initiatives can be used to support the Objective to "Increase…
A: A strategic management tool known as the balanced scorecard aids organizations in coordinating their…
Q: Explain why need for the total quality management? -Why organizations use balanced scorecard…
A: Total quality management: It is a management technique that focuses on customer satisfaction by…
Q: What is the SWOT analysis of Argos Fire and Safety?
A: SWOT analysis is a management technique that is used to assess a business organization based on four…
Q: What is benchmarking, and how is it different from improving quality?
A: Benchmarking is a process of comparing the performance, practices, and processes of one organization…
Q: Describe the Six Sigma methodology.
A: Six Sigma is a methodology that involves the use of various tools while improving the process…
Q: Describe the concept of benchmarking in performance analysis
A: In the context of performance analysis, benchmarking is considered one of the significant tools,…
Q: Define "benchmarking" and describe its purpose
A: Here, as per this Q, I would first explain the definition of benchmarking, then, I would include the…
Q: Describe 9 features of a system for monitoring and evaluating the implementation of operational…
A: An operational plan is an essential component of any enterprise, regardless of its size or the…
Q: What tool is used to rel ect the particular needs of each stakeholder group in a performance…
A: Stakeholder analysis is important to identify and prioritize stakeholders who influence the project.…
Q: The importance of TOM's benchmarking is discussed
A: Benchmarking can be defined as a course of contrasting the performance of a framework or item…
Q: Interview managers at a local organisation to determine the company's main business metrics…
A: The balanced scorecard tests enterprise efficiency in the following four basic categories:
Explain following definitions Whistleblower, Responsibility center , Lagging, KPI, Performance management system, KPI, Strategy
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
- Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?