In exercises 11-12, use all the premises to determine the valid conclusion for the given argument.1. If it is a theropod, then it is not herbivorous. If it is not herbivorous, then it is not sauropod. It is a sauropod. Therefore,2. If you buy the car, you will need a loan. You do not need a loan or you will make a monthly payments. You buy the car. Therefore,Important note: please make solutions TYPEWRITTEN and NOT HANDWRITTEN Use the given lesson attached as reference Example 4.4Determine whether the argument is valid or invalid.1. If I had a cold, then I find it difficult to sleep.I find it difficult to sleep.Therefore, I have a cold.Solution: This matches the form known as fallacy of the converse. Thus, this is an invalidargument. Having a cold is not the only cause of sleeping difficulty. It may be caused by someother factors.Further, we may consider an argument with the following symbolic form.q-rPremise 1r-sPremise 2-t-sPremise 3Premise 49To determine whether the argument is valid or invalid using truth table would require atable with 2* = 16 rows. It would be time consuming to construct such table and with the largenumber of truth values to be determined, we might make an error. Thus we consider a differentapproach that makes use of a sequence of valid arguments to arrive at a conclusion.Consider the above example.Premise 1Premise 2Transitive Reasoningq→rris:.q-sq-ss t9-tq-t9atThe sequence of a valid arguments shows that is a valid conclusion for the originalargument. Thus the original argument is a valid argument.Example 4.4Determine whether the following arguments are valid.1. If the movie was directed by Steven Spielberg (s), then I want to see it (w). The movie'sproduction costs must exceed 50 million dollars (c) or I do not want to see it. The movie'sproduction costs were less than 50 million dollars. Therefore, the movie was not directed bySteven Spielrberg.Solution:S-WCV-WPrevious ConclusionPremise 3Transitive ReasoningTransforming the argument to its symbolic form yieldsPremise 1Premise 2Premise 3Conclusion. ~SPrevious ConclusionPremise 4Direct ReasoningS WWICPremise 2 can be written as w→ cas previously discussed. Applying transitive reasoning andthis equivalent form of Premise 2 producesSICPremise 1Premise 2Transitive Reasoning Combining the conclusion s→c with Premise 3 gives usPrevious ConclusionPremise 3Contrapositive ReasoningSIC~C:~SThe sequence has produced the desired conclusion. Thus, the original argument is valid.2. I start to fall asleep (a) if I read a Math book (m). I drink soda (s) whenever I start to fallasleep. If I drink soda then I must eat candy bar (c). Therefore, I eat candy bar whenever I reada Math book.Solution:Transforming the argument in its symbolic form yieldsm-aa sSIC:m-cCombining Premise 1 and Premise 2 results toPremise 1Premise 2Transitive ReasoningNext we combine the previous conclusion with Premise 3m-aa sm-sPremise 1Premise 2Premise 3Conclusionm-sSIC:m-cPrevious ConclusionPremise 3Transitive ReasoningWe have shown that the process resulted to desired conclusion, mc, hence, the argument isvalid.

Answered: Image /qna-images/answer/f394404c-8e30-4e99-a403-18024f527e6c.jpg

exercises 11-12, use all the premises to determine the valid conclusion for the given argument. 1. If it is a theropod, then it is not herbivorous. If it is not herbivorous, then it is not sauropod. It is a sauropod. Therefore, 2. If you buy the car, you will need a loan. You do not need a loan or you will make a monthly payments. You buy the car. Therefore, Important note: please make solutions TYPEWRITTEN

exercises 11-12, use all the premises to determine the valid conclusion for the given argument. 1. If it is a theropod, then it is not herbivorous. If it is not herbivorous, then it is not sauropod. It is a sauropod. Therefore, 2. If you buy the car, you will need a loan. You do not need a loan or you will make a monthly payments. You buy the car. Therefore, Important note: please make solutions TYPEWRITTEN

Advanced Engineering Mathematics

10th Edition

ISBN:9780470458365

Author:Erwin Kreyszig

Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig

Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1RQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Exercise: Determine whether the following arguments is valid or invalid. 1. If I am happy, I do not eat too much. I eat too much or spend money. I do not spend money. Therefore, I am not happy. 2. If we serve tilapia, then Vanessa will join us for lunch. If Vanessa joins us for lunch, then Gilda will not join us for lunch. Therefore, if we serve tilapia, Gilda will not join us for lunch. Guide Questions: 1. In your own observation, what are the information to consider in justifying whether an argument is valid or not? 2. State in your own words on how to show that a given argument is valid or not. Reflection Recall a very significant childhood experience you have. Narrate it using series of propositions and explain why the argument is valid or not. Write your answer on your journal.
5. Write the contrapositive and converse statements for the statements belows: a. If you love me, then buy me a house. b. If you do not want to study this subject seriously, then drop it.
1. In a far away land there are exactly two types of people: The 'Liars' and the Truth tellers. Every statement that a 'Liar' says is a lie (without exceptions). Every statement that a "Truth teller' says is the truth (without exceptions). Solve the following problems and prove your solutions. a. Traveling in this land you meet two people, Don and Roy. Don says: "I am a 'Liar' or Roy is a 'Truth teller'". Which type of people Don and Roy are? b. In the same land you meet three new people, A, B and C. A says: "B is a 'Liar". B says: "A and Care of the same type". Which type of person C is? c. Again in this land you meet two new people, Sara and Jane. Sara says: "If Jane is a 'Truth Teller' then I am a 'Liar'". Which type of people Sara and Jane are? d. In the same land you meet a guy named Michael. Michael says: "I am a 'Truth Teller' if and only if I am wearing a hat". Is Michael wearing a hat?
Use Lewis Carroll Models to determine whether the following arguments are valid. Show your work. c) 2 1. Most animals can walk 2. Everything that can walk is an animal 3. Something is an animal 2
22. Is this statement valid? If it rains, it pours. It did not pour, so it did not rain.
m2.2 -2
Determine whether the passage expresses an argument. If it does express an argument,identify the premises and conclusion.1. John must be in the library. I've checked the dorm, the cafeteria, andthe game room, and I know he doesn't have a class now.2. As television viewing has increased, the reading ability of public schoolchildren has decreased. Therefore, television viewing contributes toreading problems.17183. If God is all good, he would not will evil. If he is all powerful, hewould not permit evil. But there is evil. Therefore God is not allpowerful, or he is not all good.4. If the Republicans win the next election, there will be a recession,federal revenues will fall, and the deficit will grow. If the Democratswin the next election, there will be increased spending and the deficitwill grow. Since either the Republicans or the Democrats will win thenext election, the deficit will grow.5. Because I failed to study, I didn't pass the exam.6. Only if you study will you pass the…
Categorize the following logical fallacy. You will tell the general manager that I made the right choice in dealing with that customer. After all, I'm the shift manager, so my decisions are always right. Select an answer Question Help: Message instructor E Calculator Submit Question MacBook Air
Determine if the following argument is valid or invalid. State if valid or invalid and the the law or fallacy used to support your answer. If it rains, I can not go fishing. It did not rain. Therefore, I can go fishing.
Determine if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. You must submit proof either with an Euler diagram, a TT, or state a standard form of argument as it applies to the premises. Premise: No passive individuals are folks who live well.Premise: All self-actualized persons are folks who live well.Conclusion: No self-actualized persons are passive individuals. Valid argument Invalid argument
Construct hypotheses based on a given observation and determine if a given scenario is using deductive or inductive reasoning. 5. Chinook, Coho, and sockeye salmon return to the stream where they were hatched to spawn. Therefore, all salmon return to the stream where they were hatched to spawn. What type of logic is represented in the salmon scenario? What is the main caveat for this type of logic? Justify your reasoning.
20.