Example 2. Prove that lim f(r) =1 by use of Definition 3, where f is given by - 21 +2 if a 2 f(x) = if z = 2 This function is almost identical to Example 2 on page 4 for pre-images, but with a noticeable difference: it has a jump at zo =2, which is the main reason that I, (ro)\ {xo} occurs in the definition of limits. Proof Let e > 0 and let 1 < I 3 with r 2. Simple algebra shows that If(z) – 1| = 2| <- 2| 3 in The right hand side of (C) being less than e on the domain 0 < r- 2 <1 is equivalent to 0< r-2 <8= min 1, (D) Hence f (1 , 1+€) contains a perforated d-neighborhood of 2 defined by (D). The proofis complete
Example 2. Prove that lim f(r) =1 by use of Definition 3, where f is given by - 21 +2 if a 2 f(x) = if z = 2 This function is almost identical to Example 2 on page 4 for pre-images, but with a noticeable difference: it has a jump at zo =2, which is the main reason that I, (ro)\ {xo} occurs in the definition of limits. Proof Let e > 0 and let 1 < I 3 with r 2. Simple algebra shows that If(z) – 1| = 2| <- 2| 3 in The right hand side of (C) being less than e on the domain 0 < r- 2 <1 is equivalent to 0< r-2 <8= min 1, (D) Hence f (1 , 1+€) contains a perforated d-neighborhood of 2 defined by (D). The proofis complete
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
Related questions
Concept explainers
Equations and Inequations
Equations and inequalities describe the relationship between two mathematical expressions.
Linear Functions
A linear function can just be a constant, or it can be the constant multiplied with the variable like x or y. If the variables are of the form, x2, x1/2 or y2 it is not linear. The exponent over the variables should always be 1.
Question
Based on the example, state whether each statement is true or false.
|x−2|<1 implies (C) |
|
|f(x)−1|<ϵ implies (D) |
|
(D) implies (C) |
|
(C) implies (D) |
|
(D) implies |f(x)−1|<ϵ |
Expert Solution
Step 1
Given the proof of , where
Here equation (c) is,
Also, equation (D) is,
Now consider the first statement, does not imply equation (C).
So, does not imply equation (C).
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, advanced-math and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,