EXAMPLE 176.2 (A synergistic relationship) Consider a variant of the situation in Example 39.1, in which two individuals are involved in a synergistic relationship. Suppose that the players choose their effort levels sequentially, rather than simul- taneously. First individual 1 chooses her effort level a₁, then individual 2 chooses her effort level a2. An effort level is a nonnegative number, and individual i's pref- erences (for i= 1, 2) are represented by the payoff function a; (c +a; - a;), where j is the other individual and c> 0 is a constant. To find the subgame perfect equilibria, we first consider the subgames of length

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question

PLEASE CHECK THIS  HOW TO SOLVE  PLEASE TEACH  EXPLAIN STEP BY STEP 

 

 

EXAMPLE 176.2 (A synergistic relationship) Consider a variant of the situation in
Example 39.1, in which two individuals are involved in a synergistic relationship.
Suppose that the players choose their effort levels sequentially, rather than simul-
taneously. First individual 1 chooses her effort level a₁, then individual 2 chooses
her effort level a2. An effort level is a nonnegative number, and individual i's pref-
erences (for i = 1, 2) are represented by the payoff function a¡(c+a; − a;), where j
is the other individual and c> 0 is a constant.
To find the subgame perfect equilibria, we first consider the subgames of length
1, in which individual 2 chooses a value of a2. Individual 2's optimal action after
the history ay is her best response to a₁, which we found to be. (c + a₁) in Exam-
ple 39.1. Thus individual 2's strategy in any subgame perfect equilibrium is the
function that associates with each history a₁ the action (c+a₁).
Now consider individual 1's action at the start of the game. Given individ-
ual 2's strategy, individual 1's payoff if she chooses a₁ is a₁(c +(c + a₁) -a₁),
or a₁ (3c-a₁). This function is a quadratic that is zero when a₁ = 0 and when
a₁ = 3c, and reaches a maximum in between. Thus individual 1's optimal action
at the start of the game is a₁ = c.
. We conclude that the game has a unique subgame perfect equilibrium, in which
individual 1's strategy is a₁ = 3c and individual 2's strategy is the function that
associates with each history at the action (c+a₁). The outcome of the equilibrium
is thåt individual 1 chooses a₁ = 3c and individual 2 chooses a2 = c.
Transcribed Image Text:EXAMPLE 176.2 (A synergistic relationship) Consider a variant of the situation in Example 39.1, in which two individuals are involved in a synergistic relationship. Suppose that the players choose their effort levels sequentially, rather than simul- taneously. First individual 1 chooses her effort level a₁, then individual 2 chooses her effort level a2. An effort level is a nonnegative number, and individual i's pref- erences (for i = 1, 2) are represented by the payoff function a¡(c+a; − a;), where j is the other individual and c> 0 is a constant. To find the subgame perfect equilibria, we first consider the subgames of length 1, in which individual 2 chooses a value of a2. Individual 2's optimal action after the history ay is her best response to a₁, which we found to be. (c + a₁) in Exam- ple 39.1. Thus individual 2's strategy in any subgame perfect equilibrium is the function that associates with each history a₁ the action (c+a₁). Now consider individual 1's action at the start of the game. Given individ- ual 2's strategy, individual 1's payoff if she chooses a₁ is a₁(c +(c + a₁) -a₁), or a₁ (3c-a₁). This function is a quadratic that is zero when a₁ = 0 and when a₁ = 3c, and reaches a maximum in between. Thus individual 1's optimal action at the start of the game is a₁ = c. . We conclude that the game has a unique subgame perfect equilibrium, in which individual 1's strategy is a₁ = 3c and individual 2's strategy is the function that associates with each history at the action (c+a₁). The outcome of the equilibrium is thåt individual 1 chooses a₁ = 3c and individual 2 chooses a2 = c.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Subgame Nash
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education