Evidence: Evidence-including facts, statistics, examples, and expert opinions-canhave varying degrees of credibility. For example, evidence that provides a reliablesource of its information is more credible than evidence that is presented withoutsources.Sources: Sources can be in text or oral form. The best sources are recognizedinstitutions and experts on a specific topic. For example, a NASA publication, website,or scientist is an excellent source for evidence about space topics. A non-professionalblogger, on the other hand, may not a very credible source. In general, a singlesource is questionable. Multiple sources that agree tend to be highly credible.DIRECTIONS: Evaluate each claim as low, moderate, or high in credibility.Explain your assessment.1. On an infomercial, individuals identifying themselves as doctors and scientistsclaim that "electromagnetic" devices can heal sports injuries. The program sell:these devices to consumers. They show evidence from "scientific studies" thatprove their products work, but they don't identify the studies.Credibility: .2. A study published by the National Science Foundation makes the claim thatexercise alone does not help people lose weight. Though exercise burns caloriesalso increases appetite, so many people end up eating more on days that theyexercise.Credibility:3. A consumer magazine that has an excellent reputation and has been around for 20years publishes an article that claims a certain car is highly reliable and gets the besgas mileage of any car in its class. The magazine backs up its claim with data fromown testing and from tests carried out by a government agency. A major newspape:quotes the magazine in an article.Credibility: sources.Sources: Sources can be in text or oral form. The best sources are recognizedinstitutions and experts on a specific topic. For example, a NASA publication, website,or scientist is an excellent source for evidence about space topics. A non-professionalblogger, on the other hand, may not a very credible source. In general, a singlesource is questionable. Multiple sources that agree tend to be highly credible.DIRECTIONS: Evaluate each claim as low, moderate, or high in credibility.Explain your assessment.1. On an infomercial, individuals identifying themselves as doctors and scientistsclaim that "electromagnetic'" devices can heal sports injuries. The program sellsthese devices to consumers. They show evidence from "scientific studies" thatprove their products work, but they don't identify the studies.Credibility:2. A study published by the National Science Foundation makes the claim thatexercise alone does not help people lose weight. Though exercise burns calori«also increases appetite, so many people end up eating more 'on days that theyexercise.dibility:

Answered: Evidence: Evidence-including facts,…

Social Psychology (10th Edition)

10th Edition

ISBN:9780134641287

Author:Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers

Publisher:Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers

Chapter1: Introducing Social Psychology

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1RQ1

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

100%

Evidence: Evidence-including facts, statistics, examples, and expert opinions-can
have varying degrees of credibility. For example, evidence that provides a reliable
source of its information is more credible than evidence that is presented without
sources.
Sources: Sources can be in text or oral form. The best sources are recognized
institutions and experts on a specific topic. For example, a NASA publication, website,
or scientist is an excellent source for evidence about space topics. A non-professional
blogger, on the other hand, may not a very credible source. In general, a single
source is questionable. Multiple sources that agree tend to be highly credible.
DIRECTIONS: Evaluate each claim as low, moderate, or high in credibility.
Explain your assessment.
1. On an infomercial, individuals identifying themselves as doctors and scientists
claim that "electromagnetic" devices can heal sports injuries. The program sell:
these devices to consumers. They show evidence from "scientific studies" that
prove their products work, but they don't identify the studies.
Credibility: .
2. A study published by the National Science Foundation makes the claim that
exercise alone does not help people lose weight. Though exercise burns calories
also increases appetite, so many people end up eating more on days that they
exercise.
Credibility:
3. A consumer magazine that has an excellent reputation and has been around for 20
years publishes an article that claims a certain car is highly reliable and gets the bes
gas mileage of any car in its class. The magazine backs up its claim with data from
own testing and from tests carried out by a government agency. A major newspape:
quotes the magazine in an article.
Credibility:

sources.
Sources: Sources can be in text or oral form. The best sources are recognized
institutions and experts on a specific topic. For example, a NASA publication, website,
or scientist is an excellent source for evidence about space topics. A non-professional
blogger, on the other hand, may not a very credible source. In general, a single
source is questionable. Multiple sources that agree tend to be highly credible.
DIRECTIONS: Evaluate each claim as low, moderate, or high in credibility.
Explain your assessment.
1. On an infomercial, individuals identifying themselves as doctors and scientists
claim that "electromagnetic'" devices can heal sports injuries. The program sells
these devices to consumers. They show evidence from "scientific studies" that
prove their products work, but they don't identify the studies.
Credibility:
2. A study published by the National Science Foundation makes the claim that
exercise alone does not help people lose weight. Though exercise burns calori«
also increases appetite, so many people end up eating more 'on days that they
exercise.
dibility:

Expert Solution

Introduction:

We'll answer the first question since the exact one wasn't specified. Please submit a new question specifying the one you'd like answered.

Since, doctors and scientists make this claim, who are experts in their fields, the credibility becomes high. Also, they are providing evidence from "scientific studies" to prove their point, which also improves credibility. But, since they don't identify the studies, and since the evidence which is provided with a source is more credible than the evidence which is provided without the source, the credibility of the above claim gets lowered.