Evaluate the limit, if it exists. lim (h-9)²-81 h→0 h Step 1 We are asked to find the following limit. lim (h-9)² - 81 h 0 h We will first attempt to do so using direct substitution. Let f(h) = (h- 9)²-81. We know that as f is a rational function, if 0 is in the domain off, then the given limit is equal to f(0). The function f is not h is not defined at h = 0; therefore, we cannot evaluate the limit by this direct substitution. Therefore, we will next attempt to use the quotient law, which we recall is as follows. lim g(x) h-0 lim g(x) h→0 k(x) We note that the quotient law requires that the limit in the denominator is not equal to 0, so we must check that as follows. lim h = 0✔ 0 h→0 So, this means that the quotient law cannot be used ✔ (h - 9)²-81 - 9)² - h = = lim k(x) h→0 Step 2 We have observed that we cannot use direct substitution or the quotient law to find the limit. We can now attempt to simplify the given function before evaluating the limit to see if that works. We note that if we expand the numerator and then factor it, the resulting rational expression can be simplified as follows. h²_ x )h +81-81 )n_h(h-([ h² =h- h cannot be used h h Note that it is valid to cancel the common factor h from the numerator and denominator because h = 0 for the values the function is evaluated at for the limit. The variable h approaches 0 but is not equal to 0.
Evaluate the limit, if it exists. lim (h-9)²-81 h→0 h Step 1 We are asked to find the following limit. lim (h-9)² - 81 h 0 h We will first attempt to do so using direct substitution. Let f(h) = (h- 9)²-81. We know that as f is a rational function, if 0 is in the domain off, then the given limit is equal to f(0). The function f is not h is not defined at h = 0; therefore, we cannot evaluate the limit by this direct substitution. Therefore, we will next attempt to use the quotient law, which we recall is as follows. lim g(x) h-0 lim g(x) h→0 k(x) We note that the quotient law requires that the limit in the denominator is not equal to 0, so we must check that as follows. lim h = 0✔ 0 h→0 So, this means that the quotient law cannot be used ✔ (h - 9)²-81 - 9)² - h = = lim k(x) h→0 Step 2 We have observed that we cannot use direct substitution or the quotient law to find the limit. We can now attempt to simplify the given function before evaluating the limit to see if that works. We note that if we expand the numerator and then factor it, the resulting rational expression can be simplified as follows. h²_ x )h +81-81 )n_h(h-([ h² =h- h cannot be used h h Note that it is valid to cancel the common factor h from the numerator and denominator because h = 0 for the values the function is evaluated at for the limit. The variable h approaches 0 but is not equal to 0.
Calculus: Early Transcendentals
8th Edition
ISBN:9781285741550
Author:James Stewart
Publisher:James Stewart
Chapter1: Functions And Models
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RCC: (a) What is a function? What are its domain and range? (b) What is the graph of a function? (c) How...
Related questions
Question

Transcribed Image Text:Evaluate the limit, if it exists.
(h - 9)² - 81
h
lim
h→0
Step 1
We are asked to find the following limit.
(h - 9)² - 81
h
lim
h→0
We will first attempt to do so using direct substitution. Let f(h)
(h – 9)² – 81. We know that as f is a rational function, if 0 is in the domain of f, then the given limit is equal to f(0). The function f is not
h
is not defined at h = 0; therefore, we cannot evaluate the limit by this direct substitution.
Therefore, we will next attempt to use the quotient law, which we recall is as follows.
lim_g(x)
h→0
(h - 9)² -
h
g(x)
lim
h→0 k(x)
We note that the quotient law requires that the limit in the denominator is not equal to 0, so we must check that as follows.
lim h =
h→0
So, this means that the quotient law cannot be used
Step 2
We have observed that we cannot use direct substitution or the quotient law to find the limit. We can now attempt to simplify the given function before evaluating the limit to see if that works.
We note that if we expand the numerator and then factor it, the resulting rational expression can be simplified as follows.
h²
X h+81 - 81
- 81
lim_k(x)
h→0
6²
=h-
h
h
h
=
cannot be used
n(n-(1
h
Note that it is valid to cancel the common factor h from the numerator and denominator because h‡ 0 for the values the function is evaluated at for the limit. The variable h approaches 0 but is not equal to 0.
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

Recommended textbooks for you

Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Calculus
ISBN:
9781285741550
Author:
James Stewart
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Thomas' Calculus (14th Edition)
Calculus
ISBN:
9780134438986
Author:
Joel R. Hass, Christopher E. Heil, Maurice D. Weir
Publisher:
PEARSON

Calculus: Early Transcendentals (3rd Edition)
Calculus
ISBN:
9780134763644
Author:
William L. Briggs, Lyle Cochran, Bernard Gillett, Eric Schulz
Publisher:
PEARSON

Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Calculus
ISBN:
9781285741550
Author:
James Stewart
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Thomas' Calculus (14th Edition)
Calculus
ISBN:
9780134438986
Author:
Joel R. Hass, Christopher E. Heil, Maurice D. Weir
Publisher:
PEARSON

Calculus: Early Transcendentals (3rd Edition)
Calculus
ISBN:
9780134763644
Author:
William L. Briggs, Lyle Cochran, Bernard Gillett, Eric Schulz
Publisher:
PEARSON

Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Calculus
ISBN:
9781319050740
Author:
Jon Rogawski, Colin Adams, Robert Franzosa
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman


Calculus: Early Transcendental Functions
Calculus
ISBN:
9781337552516
Author:
Ron Larson, Bruce H. Edwards
Publisher:
Cengage Learning