et P2 be the 2n sing the idea th or the 2nd Deriu Tote: We are no andwavy argum ense" and "seem Tow write an ac ne first definitic I limit, and the Tote: There are o do it specifica That happens if = f(4) (a), and w Iore specifically n (a) is the sm

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
icon
Related questions
Question
4. Let I be an open interval. Let f be a function defined on I. Let a E I. Assume f is C² on
I. Assume f'(a) = 0. As you know, a is a candidate for a local extremum for f. The "2nd
Derivative Test" says that, under these circumstances:
• IF f"(a) > 0, THEN ƒ has a local minimum at a.
• IF f"(a) < 0, THEN ƒ has a local maximum at a.
This theorem is easier to justify, and to generalize, using Taylor polynomials.
Transcribed Image Text:4. Let I be an open interval. Let f be a function defined on I. Let a E I. Assume f is C² on I. Assume f'(a) = 0. As you know, a is a candidate for a local extremum for f. The "2nd Derivative Test" says that, under these circumstances: • IF f"(a) > 0, THEN ƒ has a local minimum at a. • IF f"(a) < 0, THEN ƒ has a local maximum at a. This theorem is easier to justify, and to generalize, using Taylor polynomials.
(a) Let P2 be the 2nd Taylor polynomial for f at a. Write an explicit formula for P2.
Using the idea that f(x) 2 P2(x) when x is close to a, write an intuitive explanation
for the 2nd Derivative Test.
Note: We are not asking for a proof yet. Rather, we are asking for a short, simple,
handwavy argument that would convince an average student that this result "makes
sense" and "seems true".
(b) Now write an actual, rigorous proof for the 2nd Derivative Test. You will need to use
the first definition of Taylor polynomial (the one in terms of the limit), the definition
of limit, and the definition of local extremum.
Note: There are many other ways to prove the 2nd Derivative Test, but we want you
to do it specifically this way. It will help with the next questions.
(c) What happens if f"(a) = 0? In that case, we look at f(3)(a); if it is also 0, then we look
at f(4) (a), and we keep looking till we find one derivative that is not 0 at a.
More specifically, assume that f is Cn at a for some natural number n > 2 and that
f(n) (a) is the smallest derivative that is not 0 at a. In other words, f(k) (a) = 0 for
1<k <n but f(n)(a) # 0.
Using the same ideas as in Question 4a, complete the following statements, and give an
intuitive explanation for them:
• IF
THEN f has a local minimum at a.
• IF
THEN f has a local maximum at a.
• IF
THEN f does not have a local extremum at a.
When you complete this, you will have come up with a new theorem. Let's call it the
"Beyond-the-2nd-derivative Test". Make sure your theorem takes care of all possible
case
Transcribed Image Text:(a) Let P2 be the 2nd Taylor polynomial for f at a. Write an explicit formula for P2. Using the idea that f(x) 2 P2(x) when x is close to a, write an intuitive explanation for the 2nd Derivative Test. Note: We are not asking for a proof yet. Rather, we are asking for a short, simple, handwavy argument that would convince an average student that this result "makes sense" and "seems true". (b) Now write an actual, rigorous proof for the 2nd Derivative Test. You will need to use the first definition of Taylor polynomial (the one in terms of the limit), the definition of limit, and the definition of local extremum. Note: There are many other ways to prove the 2nd Derivative Test, but we want you to do it specifically this way. It will help with the next questions. (c) What happens if f"(a) = 0? In that case, we look at f(3)(a); if it is also 0, then we look at f(4) (a), and we keep looking till we find one derivative that is not 0 at a. More specifically, assume that f is Cn at a for some natural number n > 2 and that f(n) (a) is the smallest derivative that is not 0 at a. In other words, f(k) (a) = 0 for 1<k <n but f(n)(a) # 0. Using the same ideas as in Question 4a, complete the following statements, and give an intuitive explanation for them: • IF THEN f has a local minimum at a. • IF THEN f has a local maximum at a. • IF THEN f does not have a local extremum at a. When you complete this, you will have come up with a new theorem. Let's call it the "Beyond-the-2nd-derivative Test". Make sure your theorem takes care of all possible case
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 10 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Limits and Continuity
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, advanced-math and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Basic Technical Mathematics
Basic Technical Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134437705
Author:
Washington
Publisher:
PEARSON
Topology
Topology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134689517
Author:
Munkres, James R.
Publisher:
Pearson,