Elisabeth Company's unadjusted COGS for 20X1 was $84,000. They had a $4,000 unfavorable direct labor efficiency variance, a $1,000 favorable direct labor rate variance, a $3,000 unfavorable direct materials purchase price variance, and a $4,000 unfavorable direct materials usage variance. They did not have any overhead variances. What was Elisabeth Company's adjusted COGS amount for 20X1?

Elisabeth Company's unadjusted COGS for 20X1 was $84,000. They had a $4,000 unfavorable direct labor efficiency variance, a $1,000 favorable direct labor rate variance, a $3,000 unfavorable direct materials purchase price variance, and a $4,000 unfavorable direct materials usage variance. They did not have any overhead variances. What was Elisabeth Company's adjusted COGS amount for 20X1?

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Alvarado Company produced 6,200 units of product that required 2.5 standard direct labor hours per unit. The standard variable overhead cost per unit is $3.00 per direct labor hour. The actual variable factory overhead was $47,800. Determine the variable factory overhead controllable variance. Enter a favorable variance as a negative number using a minus sign and an unfavorable variance as a positive number.
A company has a $1,300 unfavorable materials cost variance and a $900 favorable materials efficiency variance. What is the total direct materials variance?
How do I solve this ?
None
Hughes Satellites' actual direct labor cost was $67,000 during the current period. Hughes reported an unfavorable direct labor rate variance of $1,800 and a favorable direct labor efficiency variance of $2,900. What was the standard direct labor cost for actual output during the period? IMPORTANT: Provide your answer in the following format: xxxxx (Do NOT use the dollar sign or commas in your final answer) Answer:
See attached image Required:Calculate Parker Plastic’s direct materials price and quantity variances. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Indicate the effect of each variance by selecting "F" for favorable, "U" for unfavorable, and "None" for no effect (i.e., zero variance).)
ABC Company had a total labor efficiency variance of $20,000 unfavorable and a total labor spending variance of $12,000 favorable. The labor rate variance was: $32,000 unfavorable$8,000 unfavorable$32,000 favorable$8,000 favorable
4.-Bellingham Company produced 2,300 units of product that required 3.5 standard direct labor hours per unit. The standard fixed overhead cost per unit is $2.65 per direct labor hour at 7,650 hours, which is 100% of normal capacity. Determine the fixed factory overhead volume variance. Enter a favorable variance as a negative number using a minus sign and an unfavorable variance as a positive number.
The following data relate to the direct materials cost for the production of 2,300 automobile tires: Actual: 52,300 lbs. at $1.8 per lb. Standard: 50,700 lbs. at $1.85 per lb. a. Determine the direct materials price variance, direct materials quantity variance, and total direct materials cost variance. Enter a favorable variance as a negative number using a minus sign and an unfavorable variance as a positive number. Direct Materials Price Variance $ ________ _________ Direct Materials Quantity Variance $. ________ ________ Total Direct Materials Cost Variance $. _______ ________ b. The direct materials price variance should normally be reported to the _____ . When lower amounts of direct materials are used because of production efficiencies, the variance would be reported to the _____ . When the favorable use of raw materials is caused by the purchase of higher-quality raw materials, the variance should be reported to the _____ .