Answered: eflection about Maria Ressa acquitted… | bartleby

Related questions

Question

100%

Reflection about Maria Ressa acquitted of tax evasion chharges

Expert Solution

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Blurred answer

Similar questions

What are the facts that relate to the "Entering the Ice Cream Business: A Case Stud of Kleinbeter -arms Dairv"
James Stilton is the cief executive oiffcer (CEO) of Rightsliving. inc Company that buys life insurance policies at discount from terminally ill people and sells the policies to investors RightLiving pays the terminally ill pateitns a percentage of the future death benefits and then sells the policies to investors for 85% of the value of the future beneffits. The patients receive the cash to use for medical and other expenses and the investotors are gauranteed a postitive return on thier investment. The diffreence beteween the purchase and sale price is the RightLiving profit. Stilton is aware that some sick patiente may obtain insurance policies through fraud (by not revealing thier illness on the insurance app). An insurance company that discovers such fraud will cancel the policy and refuse to pay. Stilton believes that most of the policies he has purchases are legitimate but he knows that some are probably not. Question Under the categorical imperative, are the actions of…
Following the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe, what rights do women have under theU.S. Constitution to determine whether to terminate their pregnancy? Explain your answerin detail
93. the Department of Financial Services may open an investigation on an individual O Being licensed in multiple lines of authority Holding a nonresident license in another state Engaging in the business of insurance without a license Sharing commissions with a similarly licensed individual COLCHREARE COLX
Connor applied to be an officer in the Canadian Forces, but his application was denied because of his poor credit rating. He filed a human rights complaint on the basis that the requirement to provide a credit check was discriminatory. Do you think his human rights complaint will be successful?
Spotlight on Dress Code Policies—DiscriminationBased on Gender. Burlington Coat FactoryWarehouse, Inc., had a dress code that required malesalesclerks to wear business attire consisting of slacks,shirt, and a necktie. Female salesclerks, by contrast,were required to wear a smock so that customers could readilyidentify them. Karen O’Donnell and other female employeesrefused to wear smocks. Instead they reported to work in businessattire and were suspended. After numerous suspensions, thefemale employees were fired for violating Burlington’s dress codepolicy. All other conditions of employment, including salary,hours, and benefits, were the same for female and male employees. Was the dress code policy discriminatory? Why or why not?[O’Donnell v. Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse, Inc., 656 F.Supp.263 (S.D. Ohio 1987)] (See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.)
Purell Magazine Construction Fraud The Purell Magazine Construction Fraud case involves James Small, a facilities supervisor at Purell Magazine and Publishing House, who engaged in a sophisticated scheme of occupational fraud. Small was responsible for overseeing the painting operations as part of the company's conversion of its plant in Oakville, Ontario, into an office complex. This massive renovation project involved constructing an auditorium identical to one in the company's European offices. Small's fraudulent activities came to light when the vice president of administrative services, Richard Green, noticed forgeries in a stack of invoices related to the auditorium construction project. An initial investigation revealed that all the forgeries were in the painting division, with a budget of approximately $800,000 a year. Small, who earned about $30,000 a year, had been the only person overseeing the painting operations. Small's fraud scheme involved creating false invoices for…
Mark Clapp and Albert DiBrito worked for the Public Safety Department (PSD) in St. Joseph, Michigan. Clapp was the director and, DiBrito was the deputy director. They were under the supervision of the city manager. One day, Clapp told Tom Vaught, a PSD employee, that the previous city manager had hired DiBrito only because DİBrito had been investigating the city manager for possible wrongdoing. Clapp said that DiBrito had dropped his investigation in exchange for the deputy director position. DiBrito learned of Clapp's statement and filed a formal complaint against him on another matter with Richard Lewis, the current city manager. The investigation that followed revealed management problems within the PSD. A consultant hired by the city concluded that Clapp's remarks about DiBrito had been "inappropriate statements for a commanding officer to make regarding a second in charge." However, the consultant also identified issues regarding DiBrito's "honesty, inappropriate statements to…
1-5. THE DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT. Sandra White operated a travel agency. To obtain lower airline fares for her nonmilitary clients, she booked military-rate travel by forwarding fake military identification cards to the airlines. The U.S. government charged White with identity theft, which requires the “use” of another’s identification. As background, the court in the White case had two cases that represented precedents. In the first case, David Miller obtained a loan to buy land by representing that certain investors had approved the loan when, in fact, they had not. Miller’s conviction for identity theft was overturned because he had merely said that the investors had done something when they had not. According to the court, this was not the “use” of another’s identification. In the second case, Kathy Medlock, an ambulance service operator, had transported patients for whom there was no medical necessity to do so. To obtain payment, Medlock had forged a physician’s signature. The court…
Business Case Problem with Sample Answer—Determining Employee Status. Nelson Ovalles workedas a cable installer for Cox Rhode Island Telecom,LLC, under an agreement with a third party,M&M Communications, Inc. the agreementstated that no employer-employee relationshipexisted between Cox and M&M’s technicians, includingOvalles. Ovalles was required to designate his aliation withCox on his work van, clothing, and identication badge. Coxhad minimal contact with him, however, and had limitedpower to control how he performed his duties. Cox suppliedcable wire and similar items, but the equipment was delivered to M&M, not to Ovalles. On a workday, while Ovalleswas fullling a work order, his van rear-ended a car driven byBarbara Cayer. Is Cox liable to Cayer? Explain. [Cayer v. CoxRhode Island Telecom, LLC, 85 A.3d 1140 (R.I. 2014)] (SeeAgency Law.)
Girly will have the burden of "going forward," meaning that she has to establish the elements of her claim. If she meets the "prima facie claim," then the defendant MMLP will have the burden that the actions taken against Girly were for a legal reason. If MMLP can meet this burden, the burden then shifts back to Girly to prove that the reason MMLP gave is a pretext (or coverup) for discrimination. (See Chapter 21, p.454) 1. Sexual Discrimination: Does Girly have a via claim for intentional sexual discrimination, that is that she is being treated differently based on her gender? Reference specific facts from the case and apply them to the law to reach your final opinion. 2. Sexual Harassment: Does Girly have a viable claim of sexual harassment against MMLP based on "quid pro quo" sexual harassment OR hostile working environment. Both types are discussed in your text.
If a restaurant ignores health codes in violation of local, state, or federal environmental regulations, the resulting dispute focuses on law. public private consensual established preferential

SEE MORE QUESTIONS