Consider an economy described by the following: a. Derive expressions for the MP curve and the AD curve. The expression for the MP curve is: OA. 7=1.5+0.8. OB. 7=3+0.8 C. r= 1.5+ 1x OD. 7=3+1x. The expression for the AD curve is: O A. Y=14-1.3. OB. Y 17.5-1.3. OC. Y=14-2x. O D. Y=17.5-2. = $3 trillion 7 = $1.3 trillion G = $3.5 trillion T = $3 trillion In order to keep output constant, the Bank will have to NX = S-1 trillion 7 = 1 b. Assume that =2. The real interest rate is %. (Round your response to two decimal places.) The equilibrium level of output is $trillion. (Round your response to two decimal places.) c. Suppose government spending increases to $4 trillion. What happens to equilibrium output? Equilibrium output will to S trillion. (Round your response to two decimal places.) d. If the Bank of Canada wants to keep output constant, then what monetary policy change should it make? mpc = 0.8 d = 0.3 x = 0.1 λ = 1 7 = 1.5 the real interest rate to r= %. (Round your response to two decimal places.)

Consider an economy described by the following: a. Derive expressions for the MP curve and the AD curve. The expression for the MP curve is: OA. 7=1.5+0.8. OB. 7=3+0.8 C. r= 1.5+ 1x OD. 7=3+1x. The expression for the AD curve is: O A. Y=14-1.3. OB. Y 17.5-1.3. OC. Y=14-2x. O D. Y=17.5-2. = $3 trillion 7 = $1.3 trillion G = $3.5 trillion T = $3 trillion In order to keep output constant, the Bank will have to NX = S-1 trillion 7 = 1 b. Assume that =2. The real interest rate is %. (Round your response to two decimal places.) The equilibrium level of output is $trillion. (Round your response to two decimal places.) c. Suppose government spending increases to $4 trillion. What happens to equilibrium output? Equilibrium output will to S trillion. (Round your response to two decimal places.) d. If the Bank of Canada wants to keep output constant, then what monetary policy change should it make? mpc = 0.8 d = 0.3 x = 0.1 λ = 1 7 = 1.5 the real interest rate to r= %. (Round your response to two decimal places.)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Question 3 of 16 Income and consumption changes for five people are shown in the table. Given this information, rank the marginal propensities to consume (MPC) for the five people from largest to smallest. Largest MPC Smallest MPC Answer Bank Bert Doug Eli Carter Al Name Income change Consumption change Al +$5,000+$5,000 +$3,000+$3,000 Bert +$2,500+$2,500 +$800+$800 Carter +$1,000+$1,000 +$800+$800 Doug −$2,500−$2,500 −$1,750−$1,750 Eli −$5,000−$5,000 −$2,000−$2,000
2. For simplicity, we normally treat aggregate tax payments (T) as determined by politics or other factors unrelated to output. However, suppose that aggregate tax payments are proportional to income. That is, T=t·Y, where tis the marginal tax rate and is between o and 1. a. How, if at all, would this change in our assumptions affect the Keynesian cross diagram? b. Would this change increase, decrease, or have no impact on the multiplier effect, or is it not possible to tell? (That is, how would the effect of a given vertical shift of the planned expenditure line compare with what it was before?)
Consider the following diagram, in which the current short-run equilibrium is at point A. At point A, the economy has If the marginal propensity to save equals 0.20, calculate the change in government spending that could eliminate the gap. S trillion. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) CO Price Level 40 120 115 111 0 LRAS 22 22.5 23 Real GDP per Year ($ trillion) SRA AD
Hi I need the second half to this problem thank you
urgent
9 In the simple macro model with government and foreign trade, if the marginal propensity to consume out of disposable income is MPC, and the net tax rate is t, and the marginal propensity to import is m, then what will be the marginal propensity to consume out of national income? What will be the simple multiplier? Please show your steps
Consider the following planned aggregate expenditure function: AEp=1000+0.8Y 1. Calculate the income-expenditure equilibrim real GDP, Y*, for this economy. Illustrate the equilibrium real GDP on a diagram below. Label the equilibrium point E. 2. Explain how an increase in uncertainty due to the collapse of multiple banks in the economy affects consumption and firm investment spending. Also explain what effect these changes would have on AEp and Y*. Show the effect on your diagram in part 1. 3. Suppose following the events above consumption and investment spending change by 220. By how much would Y* change eventually? Calculate and explain. 4. If the federal government wants to get the economy back at producing Y* you found in part 1 by adjusting its purchases of goods and services (G) by how much would it have to change G? (Hint: use the multiplier to calculate).
Imagine an economy in which the slope of the AD curve is equal to the (negative of) slope of the AS curve. If the simple multiplier is equal to 5, what is the value of the multiplier when the price level varies? Give the number and explain how you figured it out. im really confused with this question especially since my textbook didn't help at all
Based on the chart in question 8.06, if investment rises from $120 to $130 and the price level is fixed. By how much will the equilibrium real GDP increase?
Answer all four questions based on the following diagram. 1. Calculate the MPC in the above diagram. 2. Based on Diagram 1, If private Investment of $100 is added to the existing C, calculate the new equilibrium level of NI. 3. Given your answer to the previous question (question #2) calculate by how much G should change, if the full employment level in the economy is at $3000. 4. Based on the answer to the previous question (question #3), if half of those government expenditures are financed through lump sum taxes, calculate the new level if NI? (C+I+G)