nomic Theory: Micro Page Consider a market with two firms (Firm 1 and Firm 2), which produce an identical good. Both firms have the same constant marginal cost: MC = m = 40. The demand in this market is given by: Q = 100 – .25p p = 400 – 4Q Let p1, 91, and T, denote the price charged by firm 1, the quantity firm 1 produces and sells, and firm 1's profits, respectively. Analogously, let p2,92, and t, denote the price, the quantity, and profits for firm 2. When appropriate, assume the firms split total quantity and profits evenly. a. Assume that consumers in this market demand Q = 50 and the two firms compete by choosing prices simultaneously (Bertrand oligopoly with identical products). What will be the price, quantity, and profit for each firm in equilibrium? How does this equilibrium compare to a perfectly competitive equilibrium? b. Assume now that the two firms compete by choosing quantities simultaneously (Cournot oligopoly with identical products). What will be the price, quantity, and profit for each firm in equilibrium? c. Assume now that the two firms now collude to act as monopolist. That is, they form a cartel. What will be the price, quantity, and profit for each firm in equilibrium? d. Compare the equilibrium price, quantities, and profits in the Bertrand, Cournot, and Cartel cases. Which market structure is the most efficient in terms of total welfare, which benefits consumers the most, and which benefits producers the most? Hint: You do not need to calculate the surpluses, an economic argumentation supported by your previous answers is enough. 99+ onomic Theory: Micro Page equilibrium? c. Assume now that the two firms now collude to act as monopolist. That is, they form a cartel. What will be the price, quantity, and profit for each firm in equilibrium? d. Compare the equilibrium price, quantities, and profits in the Bertrand, Cournot, and Cartel cases. Which market structure is the most efficient in terms of total welfare, which benefits consumers the most, and which benefits producers the most? Hint: You do not need to calculate the surpluses, an economic argumentation supported by your previous answers is enough. e. Assume that the two firms compete by choosing their quantities sequentially (Stackelberg oligopoly with identical products). Assume further, that firm 1 moves first. What will be the price, quantity, and profit for each firm in equilibrium? Compared to the Cournot-Nash equilibrium, which firm is better off and which firm is worse off? Why? 99+ U
nomic Theory: Micro Page Consider a market with two firms (Firm 1 and Firm 2), which produce an identical good. Both firms have the same constant marginal cost: MC = m = 40. The demand in this market is given by: Q = 100 – .25p p = 400 – 4Q Let p1, 91, and T, denote the price charged by firm 1, the quantity firm 1 produces and sells, and firm 1's profits, respectively. Analogously, let p2,92, and t, denote the price, the quantity, and profits for firm 2. When appropriate, assume the firms split total quantity and profits evenly. a. Assume that consumers in this market demand Q = 50 and the two firms compete by choosing prices simultaneously (Bertrand oligopoly with identical products). What will be the price, quantity, and profit for each firm in equilibrium? How does this equilibrium compare to a perfectly competitive equilibrium? b. Assume now that the two firms compete by choosing quantities simultaneously (Cournot oligopoly with identical products). What will be the price, quantity, and profit for each firm in equilibrium? c. Assume now that the two firms now collude to act as monopolist. That is, they form a cartel. What will be the price, quantity, and profit for each firm in equilibrium? d. Compare the equilibrium price, quantities, and profits in the Bertrand, Cournot, and Cartel cases. Which market structure is the most efficient in terms of total welfare, which benefits consumers the most, and which benefits producers the most? Hint: You do not need to calculate the surpluses, an economic argumentation supported by your previous answers is enough. 99+ onomic Theory: Micro Page equilibrium? c. Assume now that the two firms now collude to act as monopolist. That is, they form a cartel. What will be the price, quantity, and profit for each firm in equilibrium? d. Compare the equilibrium price, quantities, and profits in the Bertrand, Cournot, and Cartel cases. Which market structure is the most efficient in terms of total welfare, which benefits consumers the most, and which benefits producers the most? Hint: You do not need to calculate the surpluses, an economic argumentation supported by your previous answers is enough. e. Assume that the two firms compete by choosing their quantities sequentially (Stackelberg oligopoly with identical products). Assume further, that firm 1 moves first. What will be the price, quantity, and profit for each firm in equilibrium? Compared to the Cournot-Nash equilibrium, which firm is better off and which firm is worse off? Why? 99+ U
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
Related questions
Question
Can you help me solve this please?

Transcribed Image Text:nomic Theory: Micro
Page
Consider a market with two firms (Firm 1 and Firm 2), which produce an identical good.
Both firms have the same constant marginal cost: MC = m = 40.
The demand in this market is given by:
Q = 100 – .25p p = 400 – 4Q
Let p1, 91, and T, denote the price charged by firm 1, the quantity firm 1 produces and sells, and
firm 1's profits, respectively. Analogously, let p2,92, and t, denote the price, the quantity, and
profits for firm 2. When appropriate, assume the firms split total quantity and profits evenly.
a. Assume that consumers in this market demand Q = 50 and the two firms compete by choosing
prices simultaneously (Bertrand oligopoly with identical products). What will be the price,
quantity, and profit for each firm in equilibrium? How does this equilibrium compare to a
perfectly competitive equilibrium?
b. Assume now that the two firms compete by choosing quantities simultaneously (Cournot
oligopoly with identical products). What will be the price, quantity, and profit for each firm in
equilibrium?
c. Assume now that the two firms now collude to act as monopolist. That is, they form a cartel.
What will be the price, quantity, and profit for each firm in equilibrium?
d. Compare the equilibrium price, quantities, and profits in the Bertrand, Cournot, and Cartel
cases. Which market structure is the most efficient in terms of total welfare, which benefits
consumers the most, and which benefits producers the most? Hint: You do not need to calculate
the surpluses, an economic argumentation supported by your previous answers is enough.
99+

Transcribed Image Text:onomic Theory: Micro
Page
equilibrium?
c. Assume now that the two firms now collude to act as monopolist. That is, they form a cartel.
What will be the price, quantity, and profit for each firm in equilibrium?
d. Compare the equilibrium price, quantities, and profits in the Bertrand, Cournot, and Cartel
cases. Which market structure is the most efficient in terms of total welfare, which benefits
consumers the most, and which benefits producers the most? Hint: You do not need to calculate
the surpluses, an economic argumentation supported by your previous answers is enough.
e. Assume that the two firms compete by choosing their quantities sequentially (Stackelberg
oligopoly with identical products). Assume further, that firm 1 moves first. What will be the price,
quantity, and profit for each firm in equilibrium? Compared to the Cournot-Nash equilibrium,
which firm is better off and which firm is worse off? Why?
99+
U
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps with 3 images

Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you


Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON


Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education