e specifications. The product-costing syst ry (direct materials) and a single indirect Dasses through two departments -the Mix.

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
10th Edition
ISBN:9781259964947
Author:Libby
Publisher:Libby
Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1Q
icon
Related questions
Question
Discussion Question 1
Cari Colors is a manufacturer of a specialized paint. All paint go through an identical
manufacturing process. Every effort is made to ensure that all paint are identical and meet
many demanding performance specifications. The product-costing system at the POS plant
has a single direct-cost category (direct materials) and a single indirect-cost category
(conversion costs). All paint passes through two departments -the Mixing Department and
the Testing Department. Direct materials are added to the beginning of the process in Mixing.
Conversion costs are added evenly throughout the two departments. When Mixing
Department finishes work on the paint, it is immediately transferred to Testing.
Cari Colors uses dthe Weighted-average method of process costing. Data for the Mixing
Department for October 2017 are.
Physical Unit
Direct Materials Costs
Conversion Costs
(Paint)
Work in process, October 1+
20
S 460,000
S 120,000
Started during October 2017
80
Completed during October 2017
90
Work in process, October 31t
10
Costs added during October 2017
S2,000,000
$ 935,000
* Degree of completion: direct materials, ? % conversion costs, 60%.
* Degree of completion: direct materials, ? % conversion costs, 70%.
REQUIRED
1. For each cost element, compute equivalent units of work done on October 2017 in the
Mixing Department. Show physical units in the first column.
2. For each cost element, calculate cost per equivalent unit of beginning work in process
and of work done in October 2017.
3. Summarize the total Mixing Department costs for October 2017, and assign these
costs to units completed (and transferred out) and to units in ending work in process
using the Weighted-average method
4. Explain the concept of equivalent units by referring to the above data.
5. Explain how the cost per equivalent unit might be misleading to managers,
particularly when a significant change in production is anticipated
Transcribed Image Text:Discussion Question 1 Cari Colors is a manufacturer of a specialized paint. All paint go through an identical manufacturing process. Every effort is made to ensure that all paint are identical and meet many demanding performance specifications. The product-costing system at the POS plant has a single direct-cost category (direct materials) and a single indirect-cost category (conversion costs). All paint passes through two departments -the Mixing Department and the Testing Department. Direct materials are added to the beginning of the process in Mixing. Conversion costs are added evenly throughout the two departments. When Mixing Department finishes work on the paint, it is immediately transferred to Testing. Cari Colors uses dthe Weighted-average method of process costing. Data for the Mixing Department for October 2017 are. Physical Unit Direct Materials Costs Conversion Costs (Paint) Work in process, October 1+ 20 S 460,000 S 120,000 Started during October 2017 80 Completed during October 2017 90 Work in process, October 31t 10 Costs added during October 2017 S2,000,000 $ 935,000 * Degree of completion: direct materials, ? % conversion costs, 60%. * Degree of completion: direct materials, ? % conversion costs, 70%. REQUIRED 1. For each cost element, compute equivalent units of work done on October 2017 in the Mixing Department. Show physical units in the first column. 2. For each cost element, calculate cost per equivalent unit of beginning work in process and of work done in October 2017. 3. Summarize the total Mixing Department costs for October 2017, and assign these costs to units completed (and transferred out) and to units in ending work in process using the Weighted-average method 4. Explain the concept of equivalent units by referring to the above data. 5. Explain how the cost per equivalent unit might be misleading to managers, particularly when a significant change in production is anticipated
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 3 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Cost allocation
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259964947
Author:
Libby
Publisher:
MCG
Accounting
Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337272094
Author:
WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337619202
Author:
Hall, James A.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…
Accounting
ISBN:
9780134475585
Author:
Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. Rajan
Publisher:
PEARSON
Intermediate Accounting
Intermediate Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259722660
Author:
J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M Thomas
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259726705
Author:
John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting Principles
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education