e following data show the brand, price ($), and the overall score for six stereo headphones that were tested by a certain magazine. The overall score is based on sound quality and effectiveness of ambient noise reduction. Scores range from 0 (lowest) to 100 (highest). The estimated regression equation for these data is 9 = 22.458194 +0.325418x, where x price ($) and y= overall score. Brand Price ($) Score A 78 69 B с с D E F 180 150 95 70 70 35 63 56 38 26 (a) Compute SST, SSR, and SSE. (Round your answers to three decimal places.) SST - SSR- SSE - (b) Compute the coefficient of determination 2. (Round your answer to three decimal places.) 2. Comment on the goodness of fit. (For purposes of this exercise, consider a proportion large if it is at least 0.55.) The least squares line did not provide a good fit as a small proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line. The least squares line provided a good fit as a small proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line. The least squares line provided a good fit as a large proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line. The least squares line did not provide a good fit as a large proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line. (c) What is the value of the sample correlation coefficient? (Round your answer to three decimal places.)

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question

Probability and Statistics

 

The following data show the brand, price ($), and the overall score for six stereo headphones that were tested by a certain magazine. The overall score is based on sound quality and effectiveness of ambient noise reduction. Scores range from 0 (lowest) to 100 (highest). The estimated regression equation for these
data is ý = 22.458194 + 0.325418x, where x = price ($) and y = overall score.
SSR =
SSE =
Brand Price ($)
A
=
B
C
D
E
F
180
150
95
70
70
35
Score
78
69
63
56
38
(a) Compute SST, SSR, and SSE. (Round your answers to three decimal places.)
SST =
26
(b) Compute the coefficient of determination r2. (Round your answer to three decimal places.)
Comment on the goodness of fit. (For purposes of this exercise, consider a proportion large if it is at least 0.55.)
o The least squares line did not provide a good fit as a small proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line.
The least squares line provided a good fit as a small proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line.
o The least squares line provided a good fit as a large proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line.
The least squares line did not provide a good fit as a large proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line.
(c) What is the value of the sample correlation coefficient? (Round your answer to three decimal places.)
Transcribed Image Text:The following data show the brand, price ($), and the overall score for six stereo headphones that were tested by a certain magazine. The overall score is based on sound quality and effectiveness of ambient noise reduction. Scores range from 0 (lowest) to 100 (highest). The estimated regression equation for these data is ý = 22.458194 + 0.325418x, where x = price ($) and y = overall score. SSR = SSE = Brand Price ($) A = B C D E F 180 150 95 70 70 35 Score 78 69 63 56 38 (a) Compute SST, SSR, and SSE. (Round your answers to three decimal places.) SST = 26 (b) Compute the coefficient of determination r2. (Round your answer to three decimal places.) Comment on the goodness of fit. (For purposes of this exercise, consider a proportion large if it is at least 0.55.) o The least squares line did not provide a good fit as a small proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line. The least squares line provided a good fit as a small proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line. o The least squares line provided a good fit as a large proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line. The least squares line did not provide a good fit as a large proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line. (c) What is the value of the sample correlation coefficient? (Round your answer to three decimal places.)
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 9 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman