$30 million verdict in Georgia: Threat v. Gamble-Webb This verdict in a Georgia birth injury medical malpractice suit was awarded to both the mother and baby. In this case, the mother, Ms. Threat, was in labor and given medication to increase her contractions, but her intense contractions caused severe bleeding and collapse. Ms. Threat had a rare and serious complication known as an amniotic fluid embolism. The doctor performed an emergency cesarean section and a hysterectomy, but the delay in performing the C-section, and the failure to properly monitor the baby, January, for 37 minutes during this period, resulted in oxygen deprivation. This caused extensive brain damage to Baby January. She now requires a feeding tube and has multiple neurological issues. Ms. Threat also argued that she would not have needed a hysterectomy if her care had been properly handled. The jury awarded $29 million to Baby January and $1 million to her mother, with the obstetrician held 20% liable and the attending nurse’s employer held 80% liable.  Summarize the health care malpractice case. Identify the law, regulation, and/or ethical policy involved.  Describe the results of the case. Recommend actions to avoid this issue in the future.

icon
Related questions
Question

$30 million verdict in Georgia: Threat v. Gamble-Webb

This verdict in a Georgia birth injury medical malpractice suit was awarded to both the mother and baby. In this case, the mother, Ms. Threat, was in labor and given medication to increase her contractions, but her intense contractions caused severe bleeding and collapse. Ms. Threat had a rare and serious complication known as an amniotic fluid embolism. The doctor performed an emergency cesarean section and a hysterectomy, but the delay in performing the C-section, and the failure to properly monitor the baby, January, for 37 minutes during this period, resulted in oxygen deprivation. This caused extensive brain damage to Baby January. She now requires a feeding tube and has multiple neurological issues. Ms. Threat also argued that she would not have needed a hysterectomy if her care had been properly handled.

The jury awarded $29 million to Baby January and $1 million to her mother, with the obstetrician held 20% liable and the attending nurse’s employer held 80% liable. 

  • Summarize the health care malpractice case.
  • Identify the law, regulation, and/or ethical policy involved. 
  • Describe the results of the case.
  • Recommend actions to avoid this issue in the future.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer