Do you think courts have struck the right balance between first amendment rights and the antitrust goal of economic efficiency (e.g., preventing undue influence from special interest groups) through the Noerr-Pennington doctrine? If you believe the doctrine is too permissive, what alternatives would you propose?

Do you think courts have struck the right balance between first amendment rights and the antitrust goal of economic efficiency (e.g., preventing undue influence from special interest groups) through the Noerr-Pennington doctrine? If you believe the doctrine is too permissive, what alternatives would you propose?