Do you believe that the events immediately following GM's bankruptcy alleviated the concerns that led to the issuance of the going-concern uncertainty? What issues would auditors need to consider in evaluating the ability of General Motors Co. (the new GM) to continue as a going concern?

Do you believe that the events immediately following GM's bankruptcy alleviated the concerns that led to the issuance of the going-concern uncertainty? What issues would auditors need to consider in evaluating the ability of General Motors Co. (the new GM) to continue as a going concern?

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

s1: In the absence of significant information to the contrary, an entity is viewed as continuing in operation. S2: If after evaluating management's plans, the auditor concludes that questions about the entity's continued existence are not resolved, he or she should determine whether adequate disclosures are made in the financial statements. a. BOTH STATEMENTS ARE TRUE b. BOTH STATEMENTS ARE FALSE c. ONLY S1 IS TRUE d. ONLY S2 IS TRUE
Which of the following conditions or events most likely would cause an auditor to have substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern? Cash flows from operating activities are negative. Stock dividends replace annual cash dividends. Significant related party transactions are pervasive. Research and development projects are postponed.
The burden of proof that must be proven to recover losses from the auditors under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is generally considered to be: :
When creditors who relied on an entity’s audited financial statements suffer monetary lossesafter a customer (the auditors’ client) goes bankrupt, what must the plaintiff creditors in alawsuit for damages show in a court that follows the doctrine in Credit Alliance?a. The auditors knew and specifically acknowledged identification of the creditors.b. The auditors could reasonably foresee them as beneficiaries of the audit because entitiessuch as this client use financial statements to obtain credit from vendors.c. The plaintiffs were foreseen users of the audited financial statements because they werevendors of long standing.d. All of the above
An assessment of accounting practices for asset impairments is especially important in the context of financial reporting quality in that it requires the exercise of considerable management judgement and reporting discretion. The importance of this issue is heightened during periods of ongoing economic uncertainty as a result of the need for companies to reflect the loss of economic value in a timely fashion through the mechanism of asset write-downs. There are many factors which can affect the quality of impairment accounting and disclosures. These factors include changes in circumstance in the reporting period, the market capitalization of the entity, the allocation of goodwill to cash generating units, valuation issues and the nature of the disclosures. Required: Discuss the importance and significance of the above factors when conducting an impairment test under IAS 36 Impairment of Assets.
Explain the auditor's role in ensuring that rules and regulations are followed. How does this obligation vary for laws and regulations that have a direct impact on financial statements vs those that do not?
The auditors determined that the entity is suffering financial difficulty and its going-concern status is seriously in doubt. Assuming that the entity adequately disclosed this matter in the financial statements, the auditors must choose between which of the following auditors’ report alternatives?a. Unmodified opinion with a reference to going-concern or disclaimer of opinion.b. Standard (unmodified) report or a disclaimer of opinion.c. Qualified opinion or adverse opinion.d. Standard (unmodified) report or adverse opinion.
which of the following application would an auditor apply to determine the probability of a corporation's account balance being in error? A) overinvolvement rations B) probability rules C) bayes theorem D) emprical formula
Which of the following conditions or events would most likely cause an auditor to have substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern? Select one: O a. Significant increase in related-party transactions. O b. Research and development projects are postponed. O c. The CEO, who is key to the company's operations, resigned. O d. All of the options are correct.
The Overstock-Grant Thornton dispute was publicly aired via disclosure statements filed with the SEC. What impact do you believe those disclosures had on the investing public's confidence in the financial reporting domain and the independent audit function? Were the interactions between Overstock and Grant Thornton unprofessional or otherwise inappropriate? Explain.
Some auditors claim that increased exposure under creates a litigation environment that is unfairly risky for auditors. Do you think that the inability of auditors to detect a financial statement misstatement due to gross deficiencies in internal controls over financial reporting should expose auditors to litigation? Why or why not? Include reference to appropriate ethical standards in your response.
Smith CPAs have requested that an audit client add a note disclosure to the financial statements related to their ability to operate as a going concern. The client has refused to do so; citing differences in opinion on some key loans that they believe will be refinanced. What should the auditors do at this point? The auditors should request a meeting with the client's board of directors, and discuss the issue with them. The auditors should consider modifying the opinion for a material departure. The auditors should consider disclaiming an opinion on the financial statements to preserve the reputation of the firm. The auditors should consider issuing a scope limitation, on the basis that management is not willing to make the necessary amendment.