hent/showtest.php?action=Dskip&to=D3O The results are statistically insignificant at a0.10, so there is statistically significant evidence toconclude that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is equal to the populationmean time to complete the maze for hamsters.g. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.OIf the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is the same as the population mean timeto complete the maze for hamsters and if another 9 rats and 8 hamsters are observed then therewould be a 11.6% chance that the mean time to complete the maze for the 9 rats would be at least6.1 seconds longer than the mean time to complete the maze for the 8 hamsters.O There is a 11.6% chance that the mean time to complete the maze for the 9 rats is at least 6.1seconds longer than the mean time to complete the maze for the 8 hamsters.O There is a 11.6% chance of a Type I error.OIf the sample mean time to complete the mze for the 9 rats is the same as the sample mean time tocomplete the maze for the 8 hamsters and if another 9 rats and 8 hamsters are observed then therewould be a 11.6% chance of concluding that the mean time to complete the maze for the 9 rats is atleast 6.1 seconds longer than the mean time to complete the maze for the 8 hamsters.h. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.O There is a 10% chance that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats and hamsters isthe same.OIf the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is the same as the population mean timeto complete the maze for hamsters and if another 9 rats and 8 hamsters are observed, then therewould be a 10% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the sample mean time tocomplete the maze for these 9 rats and 8 hamsters differ from each other.OIf the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is the same as the population mean timeto complete the maze for hamsters and if another 9 rats and 8 hamsters are observed then therewould be a 10% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the population mean time tocomplete the maze for rats is more than the population mean time to complete the maze for hamstersO There is a 10% chance that the rat will eat the hamster.MacBook ProבDIIDDF4F5F7F8F9F10F1F12&56789RTYUP[ 10) - ets.timoteabojorqu xnt/showtest.php?action=skip&to=3Do rats take more time on average than hamsters to travel through a maze? The table below shows the times inseconds that the rats and hamsters took.Rats: 29,39, 34, 23, 28, 19, 24, 23, 27Hamsters: 21, 22,13, 7, 39, 15, 40,13Assume that both populations follow a normal distribution. What can be concluded at the a0.10 level ofsignificance level of significance?For this study, we should use Select an answera. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:Ho: Select an answer v?vSelect an answer v (please enter a decimal)H: Select an answer vSelect an answer v (Please enter a decimal)b. The test statistic ? =c. The p-value =d. The p-value is ? vae. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis.(please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)f. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude thatthe mean time to complete the maze for the nine rats is more than the mean time to complete themaze for the eight hamsters.O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude thatthe population mean time to complete the maze for rats is more than the population mean time tocomplete the maze for hamsters.O The results are statistically insignificant at a =0.10, so there is insufficient evidence to concludethat the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is more than the population mean time27MacBook Pro000000DIIDDF5F7F8F9F10F11F12$&()567%3DRYUPム* COくト

Question of the problem : Rats take more time on average than hamsters to travel through a maze ?…

Do rats take more time on average than hamsters to travel through a maze? The table below shows the times in seconds that the rats and hamsters took. Rats: 29, 39, 34, 23, 28, 19, 24, 23, 27 Hamsters: 21, 22, 13, 7, 39, 15, 40, 13 Assume that both populations follow a normal distribution. What can be concluded at the a = 0.10 level of %3D significance level of significance? For this study, we should use Select an answer a. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: Select an answer v? vSelect an answer |(please enter a decimal) H: Select an answer ?Select an answer v (Please enter a decimal) b. The test statistic ? v = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) c. The p-value d. The p-value is ?a e. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis. | (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) f. Thus, the final conclusion is that . O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean time to complete the maze for the nine rats is more than the mean time to complete the maze for the eight hamsters. O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is more than the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters. O The results are statistically insignificant at a =0.10, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is more than the population mean time

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P