Do rats take less time on average than hamsters to travel through a maze? The table below shows the times in seconds that the rats and hamsters took. Rats:  21,     28,     38,     34,     25,     42,     35,     32 Hamsters:  48,     43,     31,     39,     49,     27,     40,     40 Assume that both populations follow a normal distribution.  What can be concluded at  the αα = 0.01 level of significance level of significance? 1. For this study, we should use ?Select an answer t-test for the difference between two dependent population means? t-test for a population mean? z-test for a population proportion ? t-test for the difference between two independent population means? or z-test for the difference between two population proportions? 2. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:       H0:  Select an answer μ1 or  p1  Select an answer > ≠ < =  Select an answer p2 or μ2  (please enter a decimal)     H1:Select an answer μ1 or p1  Select an answer ≠ > < =  Select an answer μ2 or p2  3. The test statistic: z  or t  =_________  (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) 4. The p-value =_______  (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) 5. The p-value is ? ≤ or  > 6. Based on this, we should? Select an answer fail to reject? accept? or  reject?  the null hypothesis. 6.Thus, the final conclusion is that ... The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is less than the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters. The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is equal to the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters. The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean time to complete the maze for the eight rats is less than the mean time to complete the maze for the eight hamsters. The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is less than the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters. 7. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. There is a 2.56% chance of a Type I error. There is a 2.56% chance that the mean time to complete the maze for the 8 rats is at least 7.8 seconds less than the mean time to complete the maze for the 8 hamsters. If the sample mean time to complete the maze for the 8 rats is the same as the sample mean time to complete the maze for the 8 hamsters and if another 8 rats and 8 hamsters are observed then there would be a 2.56% chance of concluding that the mean time to complete the maze for the 8 rats is at least 7.8 seconds less than the mean time to complete the maze for the 8 hamsters. If the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is the same as the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters and if another 8 rats and 8 hamsters are observed then there would be a 2.56% chance that the mean time to complete the maze for the 8 rats would be at least 7.8 seconds less than the mean time to complete the maze for the 8 hamsters. 8. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study. If the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is the same as the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters and if another 8 rats and 8 hamsters are observed, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the sample mean time to complete the maze for these 8 rats and 8 hamsters differ from each other. There is a 1% chance that the rat will eat the hamster. There is a 1% chance that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats and hamsters is the same. If the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is the same as the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters and if another 8 rats and 8 hamsters are observed then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is less than the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Topic Video
Question

Do rats take less time on average than hamsters to travel through a maze? The table below shows the times in seconds that the rats and hamsters took.

Rats:  21,     28,     38,     34,     25,     42,     35,     32

Hamsters:  48,     43,     31,     39,     49,     27,     40,     40

Assume that both populations follow a normal distribution.  What can be concluded at  the αα = 0.01 level of significance level of significance?

1. For this study, we should use ?Select an answer t-test for the difference between two dependent population means? t-test for a population mean? z-test for a population proportion ? t-test for the difference between two independent population means? or z-test for the difference between two population proportions?

2. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:     

 H0:  Select an answer μ1 or  p1  Select an answer > ≠ < =  Select an answer p2 or μ2  (please enter a decimal)   

 H1:Select an answer μ1 or p1  Select an answer ≠ > < =  Select an answer μ2 or p2 

3. The test statistic: or t  =_________  (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)

4. The p-value =_______  (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)

5. The p-value is ? ≤ or  >

6. Based on this, we should? Select an answer fail to reject? accept? or  reject?  the null hypothesis.

6.Thus, the final conclusion is that ...

  • The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is less than the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters.
  • The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is equal to the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters.
  • The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean time to complete the maze for the eight rats is less than the mean time to complete the maze for the eight hamsters.
  • The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is less than the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters.

7. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.

  • There is a 2.56% chance of a Type I error.
  • There is a 2.56% chance that the mean time to complete the maze for the 8 rats is at least 7.8 seconds less than the mean time to complete the maze for the 8 hamsters.
  • If the sample mean time to complete the maze for the 8 rats is the same as the sample mean time to complete the maze for the 8 hamsters and if another 8 rats and 8 hamsters are observed then there would be a 2.56% chance of concluding that the mean time to complete the maze for the 8 rats is at least 7.8 seconds less than the mean time to complete the maze for the 8 hamsters.
  • If the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is the same as the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters and if another 8 rats and 8 hamsters are observed then there would be a 2.56% chance that the mean time to complete the maze for the 8 rats would be at least 7.8 seconds less than the mean time to complete the maze for the 8 hamsters.

8. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.

  • If the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is the same as the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters and if another 8 rats and 8 hamsters are observed, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the sample mean time to complete the maze for these 8 rats and 8 hamsters differ from each other.
  • There is a 1% chance that the rat will eat the hamster.
  • There is a 1% chance that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats and hamsters is the same.
  • If the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is the same as the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters and if another 8 rats and 8 hamsters are observed then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is less than the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters

 

Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps with 5 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Means
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman