Directions: Read the speech first and answer the question that was asked below. He must do well since getting good results is the most important thing. At this juncture in our nation's history, we must abandon the idea that we are in a state of emergency. He needs to have a perspective that is focused on the long run while making investments. Remember that the people of the United States are why their country is the richest in the world. He ought to invest in the knowledge and experience of his own staff. That refers to the instruction they received. That implies increasing the average level of education. Those financial commitments to the nation's workforce are the single most significant item for the nation. You are, in essence, saving money and investing it for the future when you make such investments. It is not only beneficial to the economy and the nation as a whole, but it also helps individuals become far more resistant to the effects of economic downturns. This is a condition that can be described as a win-win scenario. He ought to use the chance to demonstrate his superiority by carrying out many programs designed to stimulate the economy, provide jobs for students, and offer them help. Instead of having to worry about worrying about campaigning for re-election, which demonstrates no motive to drive outcomes, the president won't have to worry about that anymore. After being chosen to serve as President for a term of four years and keeping in mind the possibility of running again, the incumbent President would undoubtedly do all in his or her power to persuade the country's inhabitants that he or she is deserving of the job once again. If you are to claim that he or she would merely take four years serving the people just to show off in order to acquire the people's trust for the next election, then there is a potential that that will happen, but four years is not a joke when it comes to the highest governing post in the country. What we need to keep a close eye on is how it will influence our economy, as well as how the president's policies will play out over his or her tenure. Take, for instance, this: US President Barack Obama, US experienced the Great Depression way back in 2008, and as the American people elected him, he took action in order to provide for and address the need of his country. He provided work that lessened their unemployment rate from 10% in 2009 to 4.6% in 2016, brought a change in Median household income from -0.7% in 2009 to 5.3% in 2015, and a high school graduation rate from 75% - 83% in 2015. What we are attempting to express is that it is within the capacity of our president to bring change to our economy with the active involvement and obedience of the public. This is the point that we are trying to make. Spending the next four years on the execution of many initiatives that will be of service to the local population. If we were to put in an application for such a four-year president in the Philippines, then this may bring about a significant shift in our nation as well, given the high rate of unemployment, the high level of poverty, and the low quality of the education system. You may argue that if that is the case, then it would be more beneficial for it to be six years long so that it can handle all of those difficulties. Then it is true that six years is a considerable amount of time; nevertheless, as a citizen of the Philippines, are you able to see any changes? As of today, the economic situation is becoming worse, and not only in the Philippines; nevertheless, what kinds of actions can we expect to see in the near future? Exists any of them? The threshold for poverty? Is it going somewhere? In point of fact, this is the case, yet, the gap between the affluent and poor continues to widen, with the former group enjoying ever-increasing wealth while the latter group endures ever-greater hardship. It is easier to say than it is to accomplish, but if society is prepared to help, and the president has the support of the people, I don't see how there could be a problem. The first four years of the president's term can be used to boost the economy. It is important for us to keep in mind that our economy was once dubbed the Tiger Economy, but after the President's term of office (6 years), it fell back down to its previous level. It is true that a presidency lasting 4 years with the possibility of re-election is vastly superior. This is due to the fact that, as was mentioned earlier, it is not up to the president alone to determine whether or not he or she will be re-elected; rather, it is up to us, the voters, to evaluate the president's performance and decide whether or not he or she deserves to serve for another year or whether another candidate should take his or her place. Question: Make a rebuttal question on this speech. The more questions, the better.
Directions: Read the speech first and answer the question that was asked below.
He must do well since getting good results is the most important thing. At this juncture in our nation's history, we must abandon the idea that we are in a state of emergency. He needs to have a perspective that is focused on the long run while making investments. Remember that the people of the United States are why their country is the richest in the world. He ought to invest in the knowledge and experience of his own staff. That refers to the instruction they received. That implies increasing the average level of education. Those financial commitments to the nation's workforce are the single most significant item for the nation. You are, in essence, saving money and investing it for the future when you make such investments. It is not only beneficial to the economy and the nation as a whole, but it also helps individuals become far more resistant to the effects of economic downturns. This is a condition that can be described as a win-win scenario. He ought to use the chance to demonstrate his superiority by carrying out many programs designed to stimulate the economy, provide jobs for students, and offer them help.
Instead of having to worry about worrying about campaigning for re-election, which demonstrates no motive to drive outcomes, the president won't have to worry about that anymore.
After being chosen to serve as President for a term of four years and keeping in mind the possibility of running again, the incumbent President would undoubtedly do all in his or her power to persuade the country's inhabitants that he or she is deserving of the job once again. If you are to claim that he or she would merely take four years serving the people just to show off in order to acquire the people's trust for the next election, then there is a potential that that will happen, but four years is not a joke when it comes to the highest governing post in the country. What we need to keep a close eye on is how it will influence our economy, as well as how the president's policies will play out over his or her tenure. Take, for instance, this: US President Barack Obama, US experienced the Great Depression way back in 2008, and as the American people elected him, he took action in order to provide for and address the need of his country. He provided work that lessened their
Spending the next four years on the execution of many initiatives that will be of service to the local population. If we were to put in an application for such a four-year president in the Philippines, then this may bring about a significant shift in our nation as well, given the high rate of unemployment, the high level of poverty, and the low quality of the education system. You may argue that if that is the case, then it would be more beneficial for it to be six years long so that it can handle all of those difficulties. Then it is true that six years is a considerable amount of time; nevertheless, as a citizen of the Philippines, are you able to see any changes? As of today, the economic situation is becoming worse, and not only in the Philippines; nevertheless, what kinds of actions can we expect to see in the near future? Exists any of them? The threshold for poverty? Is it going somewhere? In point of fact, this is the case, yet, the gap between the affluent and poor continues to widen, with the former group enjoying ever-increasing wealth while the latter group endures ever-greater hardship.
It is easier to say than it is to accomplish, but if society is prepared to help, and the president has the support of the people, I don't see how there could be a problem. The first four years of the president's term can be used to boost the economy. It is important for us to keep in mind that our economy was once dubbed the Tiger Economy, but after the President's term of office (6 years), it fell back down to its previous level. It is true that a presidency lasting 4 years with the possibility of re-election is vastly superior. This is due to the fact that, as was mentioned earlier, it is not up to the president alone to determine whether or not he or she will be re-elected; rather, it is up to us, the voters, to evaluate the president's performance and decide whether or not he or she deserves to serve for another year or whether another candidate should take his or her place.
Question: Make a rebuttal question on this speech. The more questions, the better.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
