Direction: Cite the strongest piece of textual evidence to support your assertion and counterclaim. "An excerpt of Meat Culture By Pavlina" When I see a piece of flesh on someone's plate, I also see the process that brought it to their plate. Some people argue that plants may be harmed by being eaten. I happen to agree. If we care about minimizing harm to plants, then we'll do much less harm by eating them directly as opposed to grinding them up, feeding them to animals, and then grinding up and eating the animals. If we stopped growing crops to people to feed the animals and fed those crops to people directly, it is estimated that we'd have enough food to feed the whole planet five times over. So, if you do actually care about plants, then you can greatly reduce your plant harm by eating the plants directly. Another way to reduce harm to plants is to favor fruits that can be eaten without killing the plants. You can eat a wide variety of fruits, both sweet and not sweet, without seriously hurting the plant that spawned it. And that same plant will continue to bear even more fruit. I think a more sensible and realistic approach is to keep leaning towards a more conscious, compassionate, and ecologically sound way of eating. If you want to argue that we should model predators diets to justify meat culture, I encourage you to go ahead and try bring a truly predatory person for a while. Do it consciously. Prey on the weak. See where that takes you. WHAT IS YOUR ASSERTION WITH TEXTUAL EVIDENCE ON THE TEXT GIVEN?
Direction: Cite the strongest piece of textual evidence to support your assertion and counterclaim.
"An excerpt of Meat Culture By Pavlina"
When I see a piece of flesh on someone's plate, I also see the process that brought it to their plate. Some people argue that plants may be harmed by being eaten. I happen to agree. If we care about minimizing harm to plants, then we'll do much less harm by eating them directly as opposed to grinding them up, feeding them to animals, and then grinding up and eating the animals. If we stopped growing crops to people to feed the animals and fed those crops to people directly, it is estimated that we'd have enough food to feed the whole planet five times over. So, if you do actually care about plants, then you can greatly reduce your plant harm by eating the plants directly. Another way to reduce harm to plants is to favor fruits that can be eaten without killing the plants. You can eat a wide variety of fruits, both sweet and not sweet, without seriously hurting the plant that spawned it. And that same plant will continue to bear even more fruit. I think a more sensible and realistic approach is to keep leaning towards a more conscious, compassionate, and ecologically sound way of eating. If you want to argue that we should model predators diets to justify meat culture, I encourage you to go ahead and try bring a truly predatory person for a while. Do it consciously. Prey on the weak. See where that takes you.
WHAT IS YOUR ASSERTION WITH TEXTUAL EVIDENCE ON THE TEXT GIVEN?
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
