derived from the test to survey of 258 student drivers and their attitudes toward speeding and reported the results in the British Journal of Educational Psychology (Vol. 80, 2010). One of the vari- ables of interest was the response to the question, “Are you confident that you can resist your friends' persuasion to drive faster?" Each response was measured on a 7-point scale, from 1 = “definitely no" to 7 = “definitely yes.“ The data were collected 5 months after the students had attended a safe-driver presentation. The psychologists re- ported a sample mean response of 4.98 and a sample stan- dard deviation of 1.62. Suppose it is known that the true mean response of students who do not attend a safe-driver, presentation is µ a. Set up the null and alternative hypotheses for test- ing whether the true mean student-driver response 5 months after a safe-driver presentation is larger E.38 Speeding and young drivers. Psychologists cond = 4.7. %3D than 4.7. b. Calculate the test statistic for the hypothesis test. uC. Find the rejection region for the hypothesis test, using a = .05. d. State the appropriate conclusion, in the words of the %3D bon problem. e. Do the test results indicate that the safe-driver presen- tation was effective in helping students feel more con- fident that they can resist their friends' persuasion to drive faster? Explain. distribution of rest