Deming & Sons manufactures four grades of lubricant, W-10, W-20, W-30, and W-40, from a joint process. Additional information follows. Units Product Produced 54,600 39,000 W-10 W-20 W-30 W-40 Product 31, 200 31, 200 156,000 W-10 W-20 W-30 W-40 Sales Value at Split-Off $324,000 279,000 189,000 144,000 $936,000 Required: Assuming that total joint costs of $327,600 were allocated using the physical quantities method, what joint co were allocated to each product? (Do not round intermediate calculations.) Joint Costs Allocated If Processed Further S 114,300 $ 91,800 $ 73,800 $ 73,800 Additional Costs $ 35,000 27,900 18,900 11,700 $ 93,500 Sales Values $ 355,000 324,000 234,000 156,000 $1,069,000

Deming & Sons manufactures four grades of lubricant, W-10, W-20, W-30, and W-40, from a joint process. Additional information follows. Units Product Produced 54,600 39,000 W-10 W-20 W-30 W-40 Product 31, 200 31, 200 156,000 W-10 W-20 W-30 W-40 Sales Value at Split-Off $324,000 279,000 189,000 144,000 $936,000 Required: Assuming that total joint costs of $327,600 were allocated using the physical quantities method, what joint co were allocated to each product? (Do not round intermediate calculations.) Joint Costs Allocated If Processed Further S 114,300 $ 91,800 $ 73,800 $ 73,800 Additional Costs $ 35,000 27,900 18,900 11,700 $ 93,500 Sales Values $ 355,000 324,000 234,000 156,000 $1,069,000

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

After allocating the joint process costs to its two joint products, Allomar Co. reports gross margin percentages of 30% for Product A and 40% for Product B. Sales reported for each product were $25,000 for Product A and $60,000 for Product B. Neither of the two products were processed beyond the split-off point. Calculate the total amount of joint costs assigned between the two products. Allocated joint costs Product A Product B Assuming Allomar used the physical quantities method to allocate the joint costs, what percentage of the total production volume did Product B represent? (Round answer to 2 decimal places, e.g. 15.25%.) Proportion of joint costs assigned to product B %
Denver Fabricators manufactures products DF1 and DF2 from a joint process, which also yields a by-product, BP. The company accounts for the revenues from its by-product sales as other income. Additional information follows: DF1 DF2 BP Total Units produced 27,000 18,000 15,000 60,000 Allocated joint costs ? ? ? $ 560,000 Sales value at split-off $ 561,000 $ 187,000 $ 102,000 $ 850,000 Required: Assuming that joint product costs are allocated using the net realizable value at split-off approach, what joint costs are allocated to each of the joint products DF1 and DF2 and to the by-product, BP?
Denver Fabricators manufactures products DF1 and DF2 from a joint process, which also yields a by-product, BP. The company accounts for the revenues from its by-product sales as other income. Additional information follows: Units produced Allocated joint costs Sales value at split-off DF1 DF2 BP DF1 27,300 ? DF2 18,300 ? $ 563,250 $ 187,750 Joint Cost BP 15,300 ? $ 102,300 Total Required: Assuming that joint product costs are allocated using the net realizable value at split-off approach, what joint costs are allocated to each of the joint products DF1 and DF2 and to the by-product, BP? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. 60,900 $ 560,300 $ 853,300
Atkinson, Inc., manufactures products A, B, and C from a common process. Joint costs were $154,680. Additional information is as follows: If Processed Further Product UnitsProduced Sales Value at Split-Off Sales Value Additional Costs A 7,110 $ 46,660 $ 64,435 $ 4,740 B 8,150 70,905 91,280 12,225 C 4,075 48,900 61,125 16,300 19,335 $ 166,465 $ 216,840 $ 33,265 Assuming that joint product costs are allocated using the net realizable value method, what were the total costs assigned to Product B? Multiple Choice $78,110. $77,906. $77,110. $79,396.
company manufactures three products from a common input in a joint processing operation. Joint processing costs up to the split-off point total $75,000 per quarter. The company allocates these costs to the joint products on the basis of their relative sales value at the split-off point. Unit selling prices and total output at the split-off point are as follows: Product Selling Price Quarterly Output 10,000 pounds A 4 per pound B 7 per pound 22,000 pounds 5,000 gallons 12 per gallon Each product can be processed further after the split-off point. Additional processing requires no special facilities. The additional processing costs (per quarter) and unit selling prices after further processing are given below: Additional Processing Costs Product Selling Price A $ $ 53,000 38,000 B $ $ с $ 18,000 $ Which products should be processed further? 7 per pound 11 per pound 18 per gallon
Tango Company produces joint products M, N, and T from a joint process. This information concerns a batch produced in April at a joint cost of $190,000: Product Units Produced and Sold After Split-Off Total Separable Costs Total Final Sales Value M 17,000 $ 18,800 $ 230,000 N 11,000 16,400 210,000 T 12,000 3,800 39,000 Required: How much of the joint cost should be allocated to each joint product using the net realizable value method?
Y Company produces two joint products: Sweet and Sour. Joint cost is allocated using the net realizable value method at split-off point. Joint production cost is $70,000. Neither product is salable at split-off point. During May, the additional costs incurred beyond split-off point are as follows: Sweet $ 32,000 Sour $ 48,000 Production: Sweet: 3,200 units Sour: 1,600 units Selling prices: Sweet: $50.00 per unit Sour: $ 90.00 per unit What is the amount of joint cost allocated to Sweet and Sour using the NRV Method at split-off point. (Must show calculations or no credit) Joint cost allocated to Sweet: $_____________________________ Joint cost allocated to Sour:…
Barrett Chemicals manufactures four chemicals, Chem-1, Chem-2, Chem-3, and Chem-4, from a joint process. The total joint costs in May were $594,000. Additional information follows: Product Units Produced Sales Value at Split-Off If Processed Further Additional Costs Sales Values Chem-1 264,000 $ 200,640 $ 29,040 $ 237,600 Chem-2 176,000 264,000 28,160 288,640 Chem-3 200,000 156,000 24,000 187,500 Chem-4 160,000 272,000 28,800 300,000 800,000 $ 892,640 $ 110,000 $ 1,013,740 Required: Barrett Chemicals uses the physical quantities method to allocate joint costs. What joint costs would be allocated to each product in May?
Barrett Chemicals manufactures four chemicals, Chem-1, Chem-2, Chem-3, and Chem-4, from a joint process. The total joint costs in May were $564,000. Additional information follows: Product Chem-1 Chem-2 Chem-3 Chem-4 Units Produced 288,000 176,000 192,000 144,000 800,000 Chem-1 Chem-2 Chem-3 If Processed Further Required: Which, if any, of the four products would you recommend Barrett Chemicals sell at split-off (and not process further)? Note: You may select more than one answer. Single click the box with the question mark to produce a check mark for a correct answer and double click the box with the question mark to empty the box for a wrong answer. Any boxes left with a question mark will be automatically graded as incorrect. Chem-4 Sales Value at Additional Split-Off Costs $ 220,000 264,000 149,600 246,400 $ 880,000 $ 32,700 29,400 24,900 26,300 $ 113,300 Sales Values $ 260,000 290,000 180,000 270,000 $ 1,000,000 h
Assume a company has two products—A and B—that emerge from a joint process. Product A has been allocated $24,000 of the total joint costs of $48,000. A total of 2,000 units of Product A are produced from the joint process. Product A can be sold at the split-off point for $16 per unit, or it can be processed further for an additional total cost of $14,800 and then sold for $25 per unit. What is the financial advantage (disadvantage) of further processing Product A? Multiple Choice $(3,200) $3,200 $(22,000) $22,000
Forest Products, Incorporated manufactures three products (FP-10, FP-20, and FP-40) from a single, joint input. None of the products can be sold without further processing. In November, joint product costs were $241,300. Additional information follows: Product FP-10 FP-20 FP-40 Units Produced 105,000 157,500 87,500 Product FP-10 FP-20 FP-40 Sales Values $ 177,750 311,250 85,300 Required: Forest Products uses the physical quantities (units produced) method to allocate joint costs. What joint costs would be allocated to each of the three products in November? Joint Costs Allocated Processing Costs (After Split-Off) $ 29,300 109,300 25,300
Corporation manufactures three products from a joint process. The three products are in industrial grade form at the split- off point. They can either be sold at that point or processed further into premium grade. Costs related to each batch of this process is as follows: Sales Price at split-off point Allocated joint costs Sales Price after further processing Cost of further processing Product Quantity Product 1 $16 $6,000 $20 $5,330 1,000 lb. Product 2 $12 $6,000 $18 $2,050 1,000 lb. Product 3 $5 $6,000 $14 $2,530 1,000 lb. Q: What would be the additional amount of profit that more profitable to process further rather than be sold at the split-off point? A: $ Corp, would gain from further processing the product(s) that is/are