**Title: Evaluating Lewis Structures for Different Molecules** **Instructions:** Decide whether the proposed Lewis structure for each molecule is reasonable or not. **Table of Molecules:** 1. **CO₂** - **Proposed Lewis Structure:** - Displays a carbon atom (C) double-bonded to two oxygen atoms (O). Each oxygen has two lone pairs of electrons. - **Evaluation Options:** - Yes, it's a reasonable structure. - No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: _______ - No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: _______ 2. **IBr₂⁻** - **Proposed Lewis Structure:** - Displays an iodine atom (I) single-bonded to two bromine atoms (Br). Each bromine atom has three lone pairs of electrons, and the entire structure has a negative charge. - **Evaluation Options:** - Yes, it's a reasonable structure. - No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: _______ - No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: _______ 3. **SF₃⁻** - **Proposed Lewis Structure:** - Displays a sulfur atom (S) single-bonded to two fluorine atoms (F) and double-bonded to one fluorine atom. Each fluorine has three lone pairs of electrons, and the entire structure has a negative charge. - **Evaluation Options:** - Yes, it's a reasonable structure. - No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: _______ - No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: _______ **Note:** *If two or more atoms have the wrong number of valence electrons around them, just enter the chemical symbol for the atom as many times as necessary. For example, if two oxygen atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them, enter the symbol O twice.*
**Title: Evaluating Lewis Structures for Different Molecules** **Instructions:** Decide whether the proposed Lewis structure for each molecule is reasonable or not. **Table of Molecules:** 1. **CO₂** - **Proposed Lewis Structure:** - Displays a carbon atom (C) double-bonded to two oxygen atoms (O). Each oxygen has two lone pairs of electrons. - **Evaluation Options:** - Yes, it's a reasonable structure. - No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: _______ - No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: _______ 2. **IBr₂⁻** - **Proposed Lewis Structure:** - Displays an iodine atom (I) single-bonded to two bromine atoms (Br). Each bromine atom has three lone pairs of electrons, and the entire structure has a negative charge. - **Evaluation Options:** - Yes, it's a reasonable structure. - No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: _______ - No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: _______ 3. **SF₃⁻** - **Proposed Lewis Structure:** - Displays a sulfur atom (S) single-bonded to two fluorine atoms (F) and double-bonded to one fluorine atom. Each fluorine has three lone pairs of electrons, and the entire structure has a negative charge. - **Evaluation Options:** - Yes, it's a reasonable structure. - No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: _______ - No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: _______ **Note:** *If two or more atoms have the wrong number of valence electrons around them, just enter the chemical symbol for the atom as many times as necessary. For example, if two oxygen atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them, enter the symbol O twice.*
Chemistry
10th Edition
ISBN:9781305957404
Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Publisher:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Chapter1: Chemical Foundations
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ: Define and explain the differences between the following terms. a. law and theory b. theory and...
Related questions
Concept explainers
Formal Charges
Formal charges have an important role in organic chemistry since this concept helps us to know whether an atom in a molecule is neutral/bears a positive or negative charge. Even if some molecules are neutral, the atoms within that molecule need not be neutral atoms.
Polarity Of Water
In simple chemical terms, polarity refers to the separation of charges in a chemical species leading into formation of two polar ends which are positively charged end and negatively charged end. Polarity in any molecule occurs due to the differences in the electronegativities of the bonded atoms. Water, as we all know has two hydrogen atoms bonded to an oxygen atom. As oxygen is more electronegative than hydrogen thus, there exists polarity in the bonds which is why water is known as a polar solvent.
Valence Bond Theory Vbt
Valence bond theory (VBT) in simple terms explains how individual atomic orbitals with an unpaired electron each, come close to each other and overlap to form a molecular orbital giving a covalent bond. It gives a quantum mechanical approach to the formation of covalent bonds with the help of wavefunctions using attractive and repulsive energies when two atoms are brought from infinity to their internuclear distance.
Question
Transcribed Image Text:**Title: Evaluating Lewis Structures for Different Molecules**
**Instructions:**
Decide whether the proposed Lewis structure for each molecule is reasonable or not.
**Table of Molecules:**
1. **CO₂**
- **Proposed Lewis Structure:**
- Displays a carbon atom (C) double-bonded to two oxygen atoms (O). Each oxygen has two lone pairs of electrons.
- **Evaluation Options:**
- Yes, it's a reasonable structure.
- No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: _______
- No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: _______
2. **IBr₂⁻**
- **Proposed Lewis Structure:**
- Displays an iodine atom (I) single-bonded to two bromine atoms (Br). Each bromine atom has three lone pairs of electrons, and the entire structure has a negative charge.
- **Evaluation Options:**
- Yes, it's a reasonable structure.
- No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: _______
- No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: _______
3. **SF₃⁻**
- **Proposed Lewis Structure:**
- Displays a sulfur atom (S) single-bonded to two fluorine atoms (F) and double-bonded to one fluorine atom. Each fluorine has three lone pairs of electrons, and the entire structure has a negative charge.
- **Evaluation Options:**
- Yes, it's a reasonable structure.
- No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. The correct number is: _______
- No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. The symbols of the problem atoms are: _______
**Note:**
*If two or more atoms have the wrong number of valence electrons around them, just enter the chemical symbol for the atom as many times as necessary. For example, if two oxygen atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them, enter the symbol O twice.*
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 1 images
Follow-up Questions
Read through expert solutions to related follow-up questions below.
Follow-up Question
 | ⃝ Yes, it's a reasonable structure. <br> ⃝ No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. <br> The correct number is: [ ] <br> ⬤ No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. <br> The symbols of the problem atoms are: O |
| IBr₂⁻ |  | ⬤ Yes, it's a reasonable structure. <br> ⃝ No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. <br> The correct number is: [ ] <br> ⃝ No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. <br> The symbols of the problem atoms are: [ ] |
| SF₃⁻ |  | ⃝ Yes, it's a reasonable structure. <br> ⃝ No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. <br> The correct number is: [ ] <br> ⬤ No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. <br> The symbols of the problem atoms are: F |
**Note:** If you agree that the number of electrons is incorrect, please provide the correct number.
This table helps students learn how to analyze Lewis structures by determining if the distribution of electrons follows the octet rule and other valence electron principles.](https://content.bartleby.com/qna-images/question/c94d9e95-0e25-4757-a170-f111f0abbe77/36395add-c9ed-475e-b216-ef0c69660c01/3si5aeg_processed.png)
Transcribed Image Text:**Evaluate the Proposed Lewis Structures for Each Molecule**
Below, you will find a table with different molecules, their proposed Lewis structures, and options to assess whether these structures are reasonable or not.
| Molecule | Proposed Lewis Structure | Is this a reasonable structure? If not, why not? |
|----------|---------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| CO₂ |  | ⃝ Yes, it's a reasonable structure. <br> ⃝ No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. <br> The correct number is: [ ] <br> ⬤ No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. <br> The symbols of the problem atoms are: O |
| IBr₂⁻ |  | ⬤ Yes, it's a reasonable structure. <br> ⃝ No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. <br> The correct number is: [ ] <br> ⃝ No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. <br> The symbols of the problem atoms are: [ ] |
| SF₃⁻ |  | ⃝ Yes, it's a reasonable structure. <br> ⃝ No, the total number of valence electrons is wrong. <br> The correct number is: [ ] <br> ⬤ No, some atoms have the wrong number of electrons around them. <br> The symbols of the problem atoms are: F |
**Note:** If you agree that the number of electrons is incorrect, please provide the correct number.
This table helps students learn how to analyze Lewis structures by determining if the distribution of electrons follows the octet rule and other valence electron principles.
Solution
by Bartleby ExpertKnowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, chemistry and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305957404
Author:
Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781259911156
Author:
Raymond Chang Dr., Jason Overby Professor
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Instrumental Analysis
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305577213
Author:
Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. Crouch
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305957404
Author:
Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781259911156
Author:
Raymond Chang Dr., Jason Overby Professor
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Instrumental Analysis
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305577213
Author:
Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. Crouch
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Organic Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9780078021558
Author:
Janice Gorzynski Smith Dr.
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Chemistry: Principles and Reactions
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305079373
Author:
William L. Masterton, Cecile N. Hurley
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes, Bind…
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781118431221
Author:
Richard M. Felder, Ronald W. Rousseau, Lisa G. Bullard
Publisher:
WILEY