dd more details to the paragraph below Directors are obligated to act in the best interests of the company and must avoid conflicts of interest. This obligation might have been violated by Jackie's choice to accept the order from the large supermarket and form her own business to fulfil it. Jackie's decision to create her own business put her personal interests and her responsibilities as a director of T2J Ltd in conflict. The desire to keep the order's revenues for herself rather than distribute them to the other directors may have driven her. The prosperity of the company must also be promoted, and directors must act in its best interests. Jackie might have gone against the company's interests by keeping the directive from the other directors. Instead of Jackie's independent company, the order might have been fulfilled more effectively and efficiently through T2J Ltd. This choice might have cost T2J Ltd. money and damaged its reputation.

dd more details to the paragraph below Directors are obligated to act in the best interests of the company and must avoid conflicts of interest. This obligation might have been violated by Jackie's choice to accept the order from the large supermarket and form her own business to fulfil it. Jackie's decision to create her own business put her personal interests and her responsibilities as a director of T2J Ltd in conflict. The desire to keep the order's revenues for herself rather than distribute them to the other directors may have driven her. The prosperity of the company must also be promoted, and directors must act in its best interests. Jackie might have gone against the company's interests by keeping the directive from the other directors. Instead of Jackie's independent company, the order might have been fulfilled more effectively and efficiently through T2J Ltd. This choice might have cost T2J Ltd. money and damaged its reputation.

Similar questions

hi can i get help with these please?
homas Persson and Jon Nokes founded Smart Inventions, Inc., to market household consumer products. The success of their first product, the Smart Mop, continued with later products, which were sold through infomercials and other means. Persson and Nokes were the firm’s officers and equal shareholders. Persson was responsible for product development, and Nokes was in charge of day-to-day operations. In time, they became dissatisfied with each other’s efforts. Nokes represented the firm as financially “dying,” “in a grim state, . . . worse than ever,” and offered to buy all of Persson’s shares for $1.6 million. Persson accepted.On the day that they signed the agreement to transfer the shares, Smart Inventions began marketing a new product—the Tap Light. It was an instant success, generating millions of dollars in revenues. In negotiating with Persson, Nokes had intentionally kept the Tap Light a secret. Persson sued Smart Inventions, asserting fraud and other claims. Under what principle…
the founder and chairman of the company is the same person. if he later sells the company and becomes executive director, will there be a conflict of interest? How could this be a corporate governance and ethics issue for the company and what steps/structures should be put in place to prevent this?
What is one of the primary roles that agency law plays in partnerships? Group of answer choices: A. Controls formation of the entity. B. Dictate how the partners can operate the business. C. Whether or not a partner can bind the partnership to obligations or liabilities. D. Dictates what the operating agreement must state..
Sandy works for RigorMart. She supervises regional managers and directs them based on orders from the board of directors. Sandy’s position also entitles her to stock ownership in the company. What is Sandy’s position in the company? Executive and shareholder Executive, shareholder, and director Executive Shareholder
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released its final rule to implement a code of ethics under SOX Title 404. The stock exchanges have proposed that each company listed on the exchanges publish its code of ethics. Discuss how disclosures of a code of ethics by senior management could have a positive effect on public confidence and influence investors' behavior. Discuss the consequences of not establishing a code of ethics. Support your position. Evaluate the importance of senior management in setting the tone for the application of the company's code of ethics and promoting positive employee behavior, improved decision making, or the willingness to report unethical behavior of coworkers. Recommend at least two policies that might encourage employees to report unethical behavior.
Ay-Bee-Cee-Dee Corp. has filed a Subchapter S election under the Internal Revenue Code for taxation purposes. As you know, S corporations are allowed only a limited number of shareholders and, regardless of the number, certain types of entities, including other corporations, cannot be shareholders in S corporations. Carter wants to transfer his shares of Ay-Bee-Cee-Dee Corp. to CarCor, Inc., a corporation that he and his brothers own. If Able, Baker, and Dennis want to preserve their Subchapter S election and, thus, block the transfer of Carter's shares to CarCor (without being stuck having to purchase Carter's shares themselves), which of the following transfer restrictions would best allow them to accomplish their goal?
the underwriting and issuance of a master group health policy in Florida requires that all employees: or members must be eligible to participate regardless of individual health history OB. ос O D. Found or members must be individually underwritten, and acceptance depends on prior health history younger than 21 are automatically accepted, and employees older than 21 are individually underwa are individually underwritten, but all accepted employees' dependent children under the age of 18 are automatical
matching set
Mario and Johnny want to start a business. They have very little capital. They are new partners and largely unfamiliar with each other’s management practices. They are happy, however, to be organizing a business together in order to avoid full liability for the business. Which detail of this situation is a good reason for Mario and Johnny to create a general partnership? Sharing profits Avoiding full liability Unfamiliar with each other’s management practices Little capital
Case D: Governance Corporation, Bl corporation, and Susan Schultz, president and principle shareholder of TBI, agreed to form a new corporation, Model Board. TBI and Governance were in the business of providing unique guidance formats and analysis tools for advising boards of directors on governance issues. Mark Schlussel was supposed to take care of the formalities involved in incorporating Model Board. When little progress was made in gaining financing for Model Board, Schultz announced that TBI intended to take on some business opportunities that Model Board had intended to pursue. Model Board sued TBI for interference with its business opportunities. TBI moved to dismiss on the grounds that Model Board had no capacity to sue because it had never been incorporated. Is a court that adheres to the historical approach likely to dismiss this suit because Model Board has no corporate existence? Explain.
Ay-Bee-Cee-Dee Corp. has filed a Subchapter S election under the Internal Revenue Code for taxation purposes. As you know, S corporations are allowed only a limited number of shareholders and, regardless of the number, certain types of entities, including other corporations, cannot be shareholders in S corporations. Carter wants to transfer his shares of Ay-Bee-Cee-Dee Corp. to CarCor, Inc., a corporation that he and his brothers own. If Able, Baker, and Dennis want to preserve their Subchapter S election and, thus, block the transfer of Carter's shares to CarCor (without being stuck having to purchase Carter's shares themselves), which of the following transfer restrictions would best allow them to accomplish their goal? Multiple Choice Right of first refusal Consent restraint Provision disqualifying purchasers Buy-and-sell agreement Option agreement Right of first refusal Consent restraint Provision disqualifying purchasers Buy-and-sell agreement Option agreement