D. All of the above. ume that the coefficient estimated in the second regression is correct. Forget about the effect of the Return variable, whose effect seems small and statistically gnificant. Calculate the correlation between Female and In(MarketValue) using the omitted variable bias equation. X = Female, u = MarketValue, and = 0.53. correlation between Female and In(MarketValue), pxu, is (Round your response to three decimal places.)

A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
10th Edition
ISBN:9780134753119
Author:Sheldon Ross
Publisher:Sheldon Ross
Chapter1: Combinatorial Analysis
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1.1P: a. How many different 7-place license plates are possible if the first 2 places are for letters and...
icon
Related questions
Question
Two new variables, the market value of the firm (a measure of firm size, in millions of dollars) and stock return (a measure of firm performance, in percentage
points), are added to the regression:
In(Earnings) = 3.86 – 0.28Female + 0.37In(MarketValue) + 0.004Return,
(0.03) (0.04)
(0.004)
(0.003)
n = 46,670, R = 0.345.
If MarketValue increases by 1.88%, what is the increase in earnings?
If MarketValue increases by 1.88%, earnings increase by 0.70 %
(Round your response to two decimal places.)
The coefficient on Female is now – 0.28. Why has it changed from the first regression?
O A. Female is correlated with the two new included variables.
O B. MarketValue is important for explaining In(Earnings).
O C. The first regression suffered from omitted variable bias.
OD. All of the above.
Assume that the coefficient estimated in the second regression is correct. Forget about the effect of the Return variable, whose effect seems small and statistically
insignificant. Calculate the correlation between Female and In(MarketValue) using the omitted variable bias equation.
Let X = Female, u = MarketValue, and
= 0.53
Ox
The correlation between Female and In(MarketValue), exu, is. (Round your response to three decimal places.)
Transcribed Image Text:Two new variables, the market value of the firm (a measure of firm size, in millions of dollars) and stock return (a measure of firm performance, in percentage points), are added to the regression: In(Earnings) = 3.86 – 0.28Female + 0.37In(MarketValue) + 0.004Return, (0.03) (0.04) (0.004) (0.003) n = 46,670, R = 0.345. If MarketValue increases by 1.88%, what is the increase in earnings? If MarketValue increases by 1.88%, earnings increase by 0.70 % (Round your response to two decimal places.) The coefficient on Female is now – 0.28. Why has it changed from the first regression? O A. Female is correlated with the two new included variables. O B. MarketValue is important for explaining In(Earnings). O C. The first regression suffered from omitted variable bias. OD. All of the above. Assume that the coefficient estimated in the second regression is correct. Forget about the effect of the Return variable, whose effect seems small and statistically insignificant. Calculate the correlation between Female and In(MarketValue) using the omitted variable bias equation. Let X = Female, u = MarketValue, and = 0.53 Ox The correlation between Female and In(MarketValue), exu, is. (Round your response to three decimal places.)
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
Probability
ISBN:
9780134753119
Author:
Sheldon Ross
Publisher:
PEARSON
A First Course in Probability
A First Course in Probability
Probability
ISBN:
9780321794772
Author:
Sheldon Ross
Publisher:
PEARSON