(d) You are told that o² = 1, 0₁ = 0.2 and 02 = -0.1 is the variance for the time series mean estimator less efficient or more efficient than the T = 20 sample size ensemble average i.i.d. case? Justify your answer with a relevant calculation and explanation using the formula in Equation (1) provided above in part (c) of this question.

(d) You are told that o² = 1, 0₁ = 0.2 and 02 = -0.1 is the variance for the time series mean estimator less efficient or more efficient than the T = 20 sample size ensemble average i.i.d. case? Justify your answer with a relevant calculation and explanation using the formula in Equation (1) provided above in part (c) of this question.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

1. A study compared the number of tree species in unlogged forest plots to similar plots logged 8 years earlier. Independent random samples of both logged and unlogged plots were analyzed and the number of tree species was recorded. Tables 1 and 2 present the Shapiro-Wilk normality test for both types of forest plots and the Independent Samples t-test results. Use the information presented in these tables to answer the questions. Table 1: Tests of Normality Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov Shapiro-Wilk Forest Plot Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. Tree_Species Logged .181 12 .200 .936 12 .444 Unlogged .110 14 .200 .945 14 .480 *. This is a lower bound of the true significance. a. Lilliefors Significance Correction Table 2: Independent Samples Test Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Mean Std. Error F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper Equal variances…
12. The components of the OLS variances Under assumptions MLR.1 through MLR.5, conditional on the sample values of the independent variables, the variance of B; under OLS is: Var (B) sST, (1-15) where o2 = the variance of the error term SST; = the total sample variation of a; R; = the R-squared from a regression of r; on all of the other explanatory variables, along with an intercept parameter The variance of Bi v as R; increases. decreases For the given mode e following would lead to a reduction of the sampling variance of B;? increases O Adding variable that is equal to 5+ *j O Using the same data set with the same number of observations O Adding irrelevant explanatory variables to the model that are correlated with r; O Choosing an explanatory variable z that is uncorrelated with the other explanatory variables in the model
You may need to use the appropriate technology to answer this question. The following data are from a completely randomized design. In the following calculations, use a = 0.05. Treatment Treatment Treatment 3 64 82 69 47 71 53 54 87 60 35 64 46 50 76 57 148.67 108.67 96.67 (a) Use analysis of variance to test for a significant difference among the means of the three treatments.
Part A of question one asks for the variance (sigma squared), not the equation of regression line. Is the variance 2.79 as I listed on my answer sheet? Maybe my image didn't go through, but I already had the answer to subparts B and C to the question, which you list as #2 and #3. But I need help with parts D, E, and F. I have the following answers for D. d. Y hat (fitted value = 426.46), with residual of -1.62. e. r squared value = 1.00 g. 99% confidence interval = (-11.63, -1.05) Thanks thanks
I need this question completed in 10 minutes with full handwritten working out
5. (10) A recent Gallup Organization Poll asked male and female Americans whether they were pro or pro choice when it comes to abortion issues. The results of the survey are as follows: life Opinion Pro-Life Pro-Choice Gender Men 195 200 Women 240 250 Test whether an individual's opinion regarding abortion is independent of gender at the a = 0.025 level of significance.
1. A study compared the number of tree species in unlogged forest plots to similar plots logged 8 years earlier. Independent random samples of both logged and unlogged plots were analyzed and the number of tree species was recorded. Tables 1 and 2 present the Shapiro-Wilk normality test for both types of forest plots and the Independent Samples t-test results. Use the information presented in these tables to answer the questions. Table 1: Tests of Normality Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov Shapiro-Wilk Forest Plot Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. Tree_Species Logged .181 12 .200 .936 12 .444 Unlogged .110 14 .200 .945 14 .480 *. This is a lower bound of the true significance. a. Lilliefors Significance Correction Table 2: Independent Samples Test Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Mean Std. Error F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper Equal variances…