(d) Explain why a double-blind trial would not be possible in this investigation. (e) Give a reason why a crossover design might not be suitable for this investigation.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
D and E will add follow up question
A trainer wants to investigate the training regimes used by competitors
wanting to improve their run times. The trainer decides to use simple
random sampling to select 20 competitors at the winter triathlon to take
part in their investigation.
(a) Why is the sample not guaranteed to be a representative sample with
respect to the classes of events?
One variable about the running training that could usefully be collected is
how easy the typical terrain used in training was, split into the following
categories: 'very easy', 'easy', 'moderate', 'hard', 'very hard'.
(b) Give a reason why this variable could be regarded as subjective data.
(c) Give a reason why this variable could be regarded as ordinal data.
Suppose that the trainer has come up with a new idea for a running training
program and wishes to investigate whether this new training program is
more successful than their standard training program. The trainer is most
interested in whether the time taken to complete the run portion of the
triathlon will be reduced if athletes use the new training program to prepare
for their next event.
(d) Explain why a double-blind trial would not be possible in this
investigation.
(e) Give a reason why a crossover design might not be suitable for this
investigation.
Suppose a matched-pairs design is used and 10 pairs of competitors are
selected. One member of each pair is randomly selected to follow the new
training program and the other member follows the standard training.
(f) State the hypothes that can be used for this matched pair t-test, using
notation that you should define.
(g) Give a reason why this hypothesis test might not turn out to be
suitable.
(h) Suppose that further analysis later suggested a Type 2 error had been
made. What does this mean in terms of the evidence against the null
hypothesis that was found in the initial analysis? What impact might
this error have had on the choice of training program in the future?
Transcribed Image Text:A trainer wants to investigate the training regimes used by competitors wanting to improve their run times. The trainer decides to use simple random sampling to select 20 competitors at the winter triathlon to take part in their investigation. (a) Why is the sample not guaranteed to be a representative sample with respect to the classes of events? One variable about the running training that could usefully be collected is how easy the typical terrain used in training was, split into the following categories: 'very easy', 'easy', 'moderate', 'hard', 'very hard'. (b) Give a reason why this variable could be regarded as subjective data. (c) Give a reason why this variable could be regarded as ordinal data. Suppose that the trainer has come up with a new idea for a running training program and wishes to investigate whether this new training program is more successful than their standard training program. The trainer is most interested in whether the time taken to complete the run portion of the triathlon will be reduced if athletes use the new training program to prepare for their next event. (d) Explain why a double-blind trial would not be possible in this investigation. (e) Give a reason why a crossover design might not be suitable for this investigation. Suppose a matched-pairs design is used and 10 pairs of competitors are selected. One member of each pair is randomly selected to follow the new training program and the other member follows the standard training. (f) State the hypothes that can be used for this matched pair t-test, using notation that you should define. (g) Give a reason why this hypothesis test might not turn out to be suitable. (h) Suppose that further analysis later suggested a Type 2 error had been made. What does this mean in terms of the evidence against the null hypothesis that was found in the initial analysis? What impact might this error have had on the choice of training program in the future?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman