Consider two treatments. Treatment 1 saves one year of life at a cost of $10,000. Treatment 2 saves ten years of life at a cost of $1,000,000. Which treatment is more cost-effective? Why? Consider two treatments. Treatment 1 saves six years of quality adjusted life at a cost of $90,000. Treatment 2 saves three years of quality adjusted life at a cost of $60,000. Which treatment is preferred from a cost utility analysis perspective? Suppose Jay has been experiencing back pain and that there are two options for back pain: Treatment Regimen Total Cost Pain Reduction Do nothing $0 0 units Cortisone injections $600 30 units Calculate the ICER between cortisone injections and doing nothing. Jay says he is willing to pay $10 for a per unit of pain reduction. Should he choose cortisone injections? Another treatment is discovered. It costs $700 and reduces pain by 25 units. Should he choose the new treatment?

Consider two treatments. Treatment 1 saves one year of life at a cost of $10,000. Treatment 2 saves ten years of life at a cost of $1,000,000. Which treatment is more cost-effective? Why? Consider two treatments. Treatment 1 saves six years of quality adjusted life at a cost of $90,000. Treatment 2 saves three years of quality adjusted life at a cost of $60,000. Which treatment is preferred from a cost utility analysis perspective? Suppose Jay has been experiencing back pain and that there are two options for back pain: Treatment Regimen Total Cost Pain Reduction Do nothing $0 0 units Cortisone injections $600 30 units Calculate the ICER between cortisone injections and doing nothing. Jay says he is willing to pay $10 for a per unit of pain reduction. Should he choose cortisone injections? Another treatment is discovered. It costs $700 and reduces pain by 25 units. Should he choose the new treatment?

EBK HEALTH ECONOMICS AND POLICY

7th Edition

ISBN:9781337668279

Author:Henderson

Publisher:Henderson

Chapter4: Economic Evaluation In Health Care

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6QAP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider two treatments. Treatment 1 saves one year of life at a cost of $10,000. Treatment 2 saves ten years of life at a cost of $1,000,000. Which treatment is more cost-effective? Why?
You have been recruited as an expert in health economics to recommend what is the best therapy for a group of patients. In the image below you will find the decision tree showing the probabilities for different health states and outcomes for patients undergoing two possible treatments, No drug therapy and Drug therapy. Based on the expected cost, which therapy would you recommend as the least expensive? Explain how you arrived at your recommendation and show your calculations the space provided. No drug theraphy ? Drug theraphy ? HEALTH STATES PROBABILITIES Remain in Good Health 0.5 Develop disease A 0.2 Develop disease B 0.2 Die 0.1 Remain in Good Health 0.53 Develop disease A 0.16 Develop disease B 0.22 Die 0.09 OUTCOMES (Costs) $0 $400 $300 $200 SO $800 $500 $0
How do economic evaluations in Healthcare inform policy and other decision makers
Which option is the most effective for companies and employees: a standard fee-for-services health care insurance option or a high-deductible health insurance plan.
Consider two treatments. Treatment 1 saves six years of quality adjusted life at a cost of $90,000. Treatment 2 saves three years of quality adjusted life at a cost of $60,000. Which treatment is preferred from a cost utility analysis perspective?
Don't use Ai
Insurance coverage has been shown to diminish the importance of time in the decision about how much medical care to seek and which providers to use. True OR False
Hospital has the following treatment options to reduce the incidence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: For Treatment X (status quo), it would cost 50,000 with 40 percent effectiveness, For Treatment Y, it would cost 100,000 with 85 percent effectiveness, For Treatment Z, it would cost 75,000 with 65 percent effectiveness, and For Treatment V, it would cost 80,000 with 68 percent effectiveness. Is there any treatment option that is not economically rational? Explain. If hospital’s willing to pay is $1000, which treatment option it would choose? Explain. With technical innovation, suppose Treatment V increased its effectiveness to 75 percent, would your answer to question (a) above change?
Demand studies in health care have provided estimates of both income and price elasticity. Estimates of income elasticity are usually above +1.0. Estimates of price elasticity typically range between -0.1 and -.75 (with hospital services at the lower end and elective services at the upper end). What information do these estimates convey? What does the price elasticity of demand estimates imply for government policymakers, insurance companies, and medical providers' decisions? What does the income elasticity of demand estimates imply for government policymakers, insurance companies, and medical providers' decisions?
Hospital has the following treatment options to reduce the incidence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: For Treatment X (status quo), it would cost 50,000 with 40 percent effectiveness, For Treatment Y, it would cost 100,000 with 85 percent effectiveness, For Treatment Z, it would cost 75,000 with 65 percent effectiveness, and For Treatment V, it would cost 80,000 with 68 percent effectiveness. Is there any treatment option that is not economically rational? Explain. If the hospital’swilling to pay is $1000, which treatment optionwould it choose? Explain With technical innovation, suppose Treatment V increased its effectiveness to 75 percent, would your answer to question (a) above change?
Which method would you use to evaluate a new medication based only on the cost? Cost effectiveness analysis, cost utility analysis or a cost benefit analysis and why? How can you perform an economic review?
The question scenario is: Cost of care = $10,000 Annual deductible = $1000 Coinsurance = 20% Copayment = $20 Catastrophic care threshold = $25,000 Previous out-of-pocket payment ($, this year) = 0 What is the out of pocket payment in this scenario with different health insurance policies? Assume that copayments will not count toward deductible but will count toward the maximum out-of-pocket (catastrophic care)threshold. And Explain your general approach. Use step-by-step if - then statements.