Consider three mutually exciusive altermatives as part of an upgrade to an existing transportation neworK. Consider MARR is 12% per year. Alternative A Altemative B Alternative C Installed cost $40.000 $30,000 $20,000 Net annual revenue $6,400 $5,650 $5,250 Salvage Value Useful life 20 years 20 years 10 years Suppose the study period has been coterminated at 10 years. Use the imputed market value technique and determine the PW for Alternative A:

Consider three mutually exciusive altermatives as part of an upgrade to an existing transportation neworK. Consider MARR is 12% per year. Alternative A Altemative B Alternative C Installed cost $40.000 $30,000 $20,000 Net annual revenue $6,400 $5,650 $5,250 Salvage Value Useful life 20 years 20 years 10 years Suppose the study period has been coterminated at 10 years. Use the imputed market value technique and determine the PW for Alternative A:

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Compare three alternatives on the basis of their capitalized costs at /= 11.00% per year and select the best alternative. (Include a minus sign if necessary.) Alternative First Cost AOC, per Year Salvage Value Life, Years E $75000 $-55000 $19000 2 The capitalized cost of alternative E is $ The best alternative is (Click to select) F $-315000 $16000 $69000 4 . alternative F is $ G $ 815000 $-4000 $400000 90 and alternative G is $
Calculate the conventional benefit-cost ratio for the alternative: Initial Investment 250000 Revenues 80000 Costs 22000 Salvage Value 50000 Useful life 9 MARR 0.1.
Full solution
Sensitivity If the MARR is 5%, compute the value of 'X' that makes the two alternatives equally desirable. Cost Uniform annual benefit Salvage value Useful life, in years A (Newnan 9-63) $150 401 100 6 B X 65 200 (Enter the nearest dollar value without symbols or commas.)
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given next. The MARR is 20% per year. At the end of the useful life, the investment will be sold A B Capital $28,000 $55,000 $40,000 Investment Annual 15,000 13,000 22,000 Expenses Annual 23,000 28,000 32,000 Revenues MV at EOY 10 10,000 10 years 6,000 8,000 Useful life 10 years 10 years Evaluate all alternatives using PW & IRR method and determine which alternative is preferable.
The Bureau of Public Highways is considering possible types of road surfacing with cost estimates per kilometer: Type B P650k First Cost Resurfacing period Resurfacing Cost Type A P500k 8 years P200k Average annual maintenance cost P15k The periodic resurfacing do not include the base of the subgrade. Compare these types by calculating the present worth for 24 year service, with no salvage value at the end of this time using interest rate of 10%. What if Capitalized Cost is used, which is better? 12 years P250k P20k
Determine which model is to selected.... Without plagiarism
Compare the alternatives C and D on the basis of a present worth analysis using an interest rate of 13% per year and a study period of 10 years. Alternative C $-46,000 $4,000 $-1,300 $6,000 10 First Cost AOC, per Year Annual Increase in Operating Cost, per Year Salvage Value Life. Years The present worth of alternative C is $1 (Click to select) offers the lower present worth. HELIME BIEN D $-20,000 $-7,500 $-100 $1,300 5 and that of alternative D is $ A
Hi expert bro Hand written solution is not allowed.
Consider the following cash flow profile and assume MARR is 10%/yr. Solve, a. Determine the ERR for this project. b. Is this project economically attractive?
Car A costs $800 more than Car B, but it consumes 0.035 gallons/mile versus 0.06 gallons/mile for Car B. Both vehicles last 10 years and B's salvage value is $175 smaller than A's. Fuel costs $2.30/gallon. Other things being equal, beyond how many miles of use per year (x) does A become preferable to B?
These data were derived from a forest inventory and are to be used to calculate the best (most revenue return) rotation. The manager wishes to maximize net income and has the following information: Establishment Costs: $175/acre Thinning and burning at age 17 cost: $75 Stumpage sells for: $41/unitvol MAR: 6.7% Annual Expenses: $8/acre Inventory Data over Life of the Forest Stand (Ages 0-60 years) Stand age (vol/acre) 15 5.13 20 13.98 25 25.22 30 35.11 35 44.19 40 51.85 45 56.79117447 50 63.03092644 55 68.76322479 60 74.05934015