Consider the nonlinear optimization model stated below. Min 2x² 18x + 2XY+Y²-16Y + 56 s.t. X + 4Y S9 (a) Find the minimum solution to this problem. at (x, y) = (b) If the right-hand side of the constraint is increased from 9 to 10, how much do you expect the objective function to change? Based on the dual value on the constraint X + 4Y ≤ 9, we expect the optimal objective function value to decrease by (c) Resolve the problem with a new right-hand side of the constraint of 10. How does the actual change compare with your estimate? If we resolve the problem with a new right-hand-side of 10 the new optimal objective function value is so the actual change is a decrease of rather than what we expected in part (b).

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
icon
Related questions
Question
Consider the nonlinear optimization model stated below.
Min 2x² 18x + 2XY+Y² - 16Y + 56
s.t.
X + 4Y ≤ 9
(a) Find the minimum solution to this problem.
at (x, y) =
(b) If the right-hand side of the constraint is increased from 9 to 10, how much do you expect the objective function to change?
Based on the dual value on the constraint X + 4Y ≤9, we expect the optimal objective function value to decrease by
(c) Resolve the problem with a new right-hand side of the constraint of 10. How does the actual change compare with your estimate?
If we resolve the problem with a new right-hand-side of 10 the new optimal objective function value is
, so the actual change is a decrease of
rather than what we expected in part (b).
Transcribed Image Text:Consider the nonlinear optimization model stated below. Min 2x² 18x + 2XY+Y² - 16Y + 56 s.t. X + 4Y ≤ 9 (a) Find the minimum solution to this problem. at (x, y) = (b) If the right-hand side of the constraint is increased from 9 to 10, how much do you expect the objective function to change? Based on the dual value on the constraint X + 4Y ≤9, we expect the optimal objective function value to decrease by (c) Resolve the problem with a new right-hand side of the constraint of 10. How does the actual change compare with your estimate? If we resolve the problem with a new right-hand-side of 10 the new optimal objective function value is , so the actual change is a decrease of rather than what we expected in part (b).
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Basic Technical Mathematics
Basic Technical Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134437705
Author:
Washington
Publisher:
PEARSON
Topology
Topology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134689517
Author:
Munkres, James R.
Publisher:
Pearson,