Consider the GBN protocol with a sender window size of 4 and a sequence number range of 1,024. Suppose that at time t, the next in-order packet that the receiver is expecting has a sequence number of k. Assume that the medium does not reorder messages. Answer the following questions: a. What are the possible sets of sequence numbers inside the sender's window at time !? Justify your answer. b. What are all possible values of the ACK field in all possible messages currently propagating back to the sender at time? Justify your answer.

Consider the GBN protocol with a sender window size of 4 and a sequence number range of 1,024. Suppose that at time t, the next in-order packet that the receiver is expecting has a sequence number of k. Assume that the medium does not reorder messages. Answer the following questions: a. What are the possible sets of sequence numbers inside the sender's window at time !? Justify your answer. b. What are all possible values of the ACK field in all possible messages currently propagating back to the sender at time? Justify your answer.

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Assume that a sender transmits packets to a destination using a sequence number of 7 bits. What is the sequence number when the sender sends 200 packets if the sender starts the sequence number at zero?
2.
UDP and TCP use 1s complement for their checksums. Suppose the receive received two 3-bits payload messages: 010, 001. The checksum received is 100. Find all possible original messages. How many errors were made during the transmission?
How many packets would the receiver have to be in order to make sure the acknowledgements have been sent and received until they can no longer receive them?
Suppose the information content of a packet is the bit pattern 1110101010101111 and an even parity scheme is being used. What would the value of the checksum field be for the case of a two-dimensional parity scheme? Your answer should be such that a minimum-length checksum field is used.
The sender is aware of a constant round-trip delay between themselves and the recipient. Is a timer still needed in protocol rdt 3.0 considering the risk for packet loss? Explain.
Will there be any collision between two nodes for given scenario? Given that two nodes start to transmit a packet of length "L" at the same time at the rate "R". The propagation delay between the two nodes is "dprop".
Explain integer division?
Assume that there is a constant roundtrip delay between the sender and the recipient, and that the sender is aware of this delay. Is the use of a timer in protocol rdt 3.0 still required, given the possibility of packet loss? Explain.
Consider the scenario in which a sequence of packets are sent from one site to another along a predetermined route, starting at the sending host and finishing at the receiving host. Provide a rundown of the many components that contribute to the overall end-to-end latency of a single packet. Which delays are always present, and which ones are subject to change?
solve the question given in the image provided.
The sender side of rdt3.0 only ignores (that I does not take action) all received packages, which either are in error or with the wrong meaning in the recognition region. Assume that in these conditions, rdt3.0 actually retransmit the existing data packet. I Will the protocol continue to work? (Hint: Consider what would happen if only bit errors were made; there are no packet loses but premature timeouts are possible. Consider how much the nth packet is sent, when n reaches infinity.)