Consider the following variant of the alternating-offer bargaining model that differs from the standard model in that players have outside options giving them positive payoffs if they fail to reach agreement. Specifically, two players bargain over the division of 1 dollar. There are T rounds of bargaining, where T≥ 1. In the first round, player 1 chooses an amount * € [0, 1] to offer to player 2. After observing the value of r, player 2 decides whether to accept or reject the offer. If player 2 accepts, the game ends, he receives a payoff of r, and player 1 receives a payoff of 1-2. If player 2 rejects and T = 1, the game ends and both players receive payoffs of r, where r € (0,1/2). If player 2 rejects and T> 1, they enter the second round of bargaining, in which player 2 chooses an amount y € [0, 1] to offer to player 1, which player 1 observes before choosing whether to accept or reject it. If player 1 accepts, the game ends, she receives a payoff of dy, and player 2 receives a payoff of 8(1-y), where 8 € (0,1) is the discount factor. Play proceeds in this way until either an offer is accepted, or the offers in all T rounds have been rejected. If agreement is reached in period t, both players' payoffs are discounted by st-1. If the game ends with all offers having been rejected, each player receives a payoff of 87-1r. (a) Suppose T = 1. Find all subgame perfect equilibria. Solution: There is a unique SPE: player 1 offers r and player 2 accepts any offer of at least r. (b) Suppose T = 3. Find all subgame perfect equilibrium outcomes. (Note that you do not have to describe the full equilibrium strategies.) Solution: If bargaining reaches the third round, by the answer to part (a), 1 offers r and 2 accepts any offer of at least r. Thus in the second round, 1 accepts any offer of at least 8(1-r). Knowing this, player 2 can either offer 8(1-r), which will be accepted giving him a payoff of 8(1–8(1-r)), or make an unacceptable offer and end up getting a payoff of 8²r; the former is preferable since & € (0,1). Thus if 2 rejects 1's offer in the first round, he receives a payoff of 8(1-8(1-r)). Hence he accepts any offer of at least
Consider the following variant of the alternating-offer bargaining model that differs from the standard model in that players have outside options giving them positive payoffs if they fail to reach agreement. Specifically, two players bargain over the division of 1 dollar. There are T rounds of bargaining, where T≥ 1. In the first round, player 1 chooses an amount * € [0, 1] to offer to player 2. After observing the value of r, player 2 decides whether to accept or reject the offer. If player 2 accepts, the game ends, he receives a payoff of r, and player 1 receives a payoff of 1-2. If player 2 rejects and T = 1, the game ends and both players receive payoffs of r, where r € (0,1/2). If player 2 rejects and T> 1, they enter the second round of bargaining, in which player 2 chooses an amount y € [0, 1] to offer to player 1, which player 1 observes before choosing whether to accept or reject it. If player 1 accepts, the game ends, she receives a payoff of dy, and player 2 receives a payoff of 8(1-y), where 8 € (0,1) is the discount factor. Play proceeds in this way until either an offer is accepted, or the offers in all T rounds have been rejected. If agreement is reached in period t, both players' payoffs are discounted by st-1. If the game ends with all offers having been rejected, each player receives a payoff of 87-1r. (a) Suppose T = 1. Find all subgame perfect equilibria. Solution: There is a unique SPE: player 1 offers r and player 2 accepts any offer of at least r. (b) Suppose T = 3. Find all subgame perfect equilibrium outcomes. (Note that you do not have to describe the full equilibrium strategies.) Solution: If bargaining reaches the third round, by the answer to part (a), 1 offers r and 2 accepts any offer of at least r. Thus in the second round, 1 accepts any offer of at least 8(1-r). Knowing this, player 2 can either offer 8(1-r), which will be accepted giving him a payoff of 8(1–8(1-r)), or make an unacceptable offer and end up getting a payoff of 8²r; the former is preferable since & € (0,1). Thus if 2 rejects 1's offer in the first round, he receives a payoff of 8(1-8(1-r)). Hence he accepts any offer of at least
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
Related questions
Question
PLEASE CHECK THIS HOW TO SOLVE show steps EXPLAIN BASICS AND CONCEPTS
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education