Consider the following unobserved effects model: Yit =B₁xit1+...+Bkitk + ai + Uit You plan on using fixed effects to estimate the model. Suppose you have a panel data set consisting of 10 individuals over 6 years. However, you are missing the last 3 years of data for the third, i = 3, Individual in your data set. Your panel data set has total observations. Suppose the reason individual i is missing data for certain time periods (called attrition) is correlated with the idiosyncratic error, uit. Recall that ai is assumed to be uncorrelated with the idiosyncratic error, uit. This correlation cause the fixed effects estimators to be biased.

Consider the following unobserved effects model: Yit =B₁xit1+...+Bkitk + ai + Uit You plan on using fixed effects to estimate the model. Suppose you have a panel data set consisting of 10 individuals over 6 years. However, you are missing the last 3 years of data for the third, i = 3, Individual in your data set. Your panel data set has total observations. Suppose the reason individual i is missing data for certain time periods (called attrition) is correlated with the idiosyncratic error, uit. Recall that ai is assumed to be uncorrelated with the idiosyncratic error, uit. This correlation cause the fixed effects estimators to be biased.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose we are interested in evaluating the impact on wages of being a college graduate and of residing in California. To this end we define the following dummy variables if college graduate if not college graduate coll = ncoll = if not college graduate if college graduate 1 cali = if residing in California S 1 if not residing in California ncali = if not residing in California if residing in California and for wages denoting yearly wages, we estimate the following model of returns to education wages = B1 coll+ B2ncoll + B3 cali + B4(coll x cali) + e where E[e|coll, cali] = 0. Which parameter or combination of parameters measures the increase in expected wages from obtaining a college degree (comparing to not having a college degree) when residing California? O a. None of the other options is correct O b. Bi – B2 O c. B1 – B2 + ß4 O d. B4 O e. Bi + B3 – ßi – B4 O f. Bi + B4 – ß2 – B4 Clear my choice
Consider the following panel model to examine the effect of retirement on consumption expenditure, consit, of individual i over years t=1,…,3: (B1) log⁡(consit) = β0 + β1retiredit + β2ageit + β3marriedit + β4healthit + δ1Yr2t + δ2Yr3t + ai + uit Where: retiredit is a dummy variable equal to 1 if individual i is retired on year t and 0 otherwise ageit is the individual's age in years marriedit is an indicator variable for whether the individual is married (1) or not (0) in year t healthit is an indicator variable equal to 1 if the individual is in 'good health' and 0 otherwise Yr2 is a dummy variable equal to 1 in year t=2 and 0 otherwise Yr3 is a dummy variable equal to 1 in year t=3 and 0 otherwise We obtain the following results when we estimate Model (B1) using RE and FE methods: Variable Random Effects Fixed Effects retired -0.072*** (0.024) -0.054** (0.025) age -0.008*** (0.003) - married 0.031*** (0.010) 0.028 (0.022) health 0.050*** (0.021) 0.052***…
Econometrics Thomas Eisensee and David Stromberg wanted to measure how much news coverage of a foreign disaster impacted the amount of disaster relief provided by the U.S. government. They argue that the simple relationship would be biased. Let X = Minutes of News Coverage and Y= Disaster Aid. Choose a variable X2 that could bias the simple relationship. This variable should impact the amount of coverage and impact the amount of aid for reasons other than purely news coverage. Eisensee and Stromberg introduce an instrument Z = During the Olympics. Explain how Z could satisfy the relevant and exogenous criteria. Explain how you could use Z to estimate the impact of X on Y free from X2 bias. Hint: you should mention two stages.
(Yi, X1i, X2i) satisfy the assumptions of the attachment. You are interestedin β1, the causal effect of X1 on Y. Suppose that X1 and X2 are uncorrelated.You estimate β1 by regressing Y onto X1 (so that X2 is not included in theregression). Does this estimator suffer from omitted variable bias? Explain.
The model initial setup is• The number of vacancies posted in the economy during a particular month is v = 100.• There were initially u = 225 unemployed workers at the beginning of the month.• Suppose that the average wage is 0.6 relative to their productivity. Unemployed workersreceive benefits that are half the wage, i.e., b = 0.3 relative to productivity.• Suppose that the number of matches between firms and workers are given by thefollowing matching functionsM = Au^0.5v^0.5• Suppose that 45 workers were able to find a job by the end of the month.Answer the following questions.a) What is the monthly job finding rate?b) What is the probability that an average vacancy is filled in a month?c) What is the job creation cost, k?d) What is the value of A?e) Explain how introducing a searching cost to this model would affect the queue length,the number of vacancy and unemployment rate, and wage.
Explain what multicollinearity . What are the main problems that multicollinearity creates for OLS estimation results ? Give two ways to detect multicollinearity problem and the hypothesis that are tested ?
QUESTION 2 You work for a big retail chain that operates in a large number of regional markets and you want to investigate the effect of increased marketing spending on sales. You randomly select half of the markets and increase the marketing budget in these markets by 10%. The rest of the markets are allocated the same marketing budget as before. Then comparing the average sales in the markets with increased marketing budget and average sales in the remaining markets will give an unbiased estimate of the true causal effect of increased marketing spending on sales. True O False
number 1 please
Explain Conditional Mean Independence by considering a regression with two regressors?
A justification for job training programs is that they improve worker productivity. Suppose that you are asked to evaluate whethe r more job training makes workers more productive. However, rather than having data on individual workers, you have access to data on manufacturing firms in Ohio. In particular, for each firm, you have information on hours of job training per worker (training) and number of nondefective items produced per worker hour (output).(iv) If you find a positive correlation between output and training, would you have convincingly established that job training makes workers more productive? Explain.
Q. 30 The t test can be used for testing the JOINT significance of ALL explanatory variables x2, x3, and x4 in a multiple regression model. O True O False
Describe the recommended approach towards determining model specification.How does the R2 help in determining an appropriate model? Is theideal model the one with the highest R2? Should a regressor be included in the model if it increases the model R2?