Consider the following two projects:Project Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 DiscountC/FC/F C/FAlpha -7920Beta -802520225C/FC/FC/FC/FC/FRate3025223540N/AN/A17%2525252514%Assume that projects Alpha and Beta are mutually exclusive. The correct investment decision and the best rationale for that decision is toO A. invest in project Beta, since NPV> 0.BetaOB. invest in project Beta, since IRR IRRAC. invest in project Beta, since NPV> NPVBeta> 0.Alpha< NPVBetaAlphaOD. invest in project Alpha, since NPV

To ensure the correctness of the chosen answer, let's briefly analyze the projects using the…

Answered: Consider the following two projects:…

Essentials Of Investments

11th Edition

ISBN:9781260013924

Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.

Publisher:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.

Chapter1: Investments: Background And Issues

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PS

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

There are two types of projects in the market: A (safer) and B (riskier). At time 1, the payoff of A will be either $500 (probability 0.75) or $300 (probability 0.25). The appropriate discount rate for project A is 12%. The minimum price A can accept is $350. The payoff of B will be either $800 (probability 0.2) or $100 (probability 0.8). The appropriate discount rate for project B is 20%. In this simple economy, there are 90% chance that the project will be A. Evaluate the funding situation, i.e., which type of project will be funded and the price, based on the following scenarios: If a bank can tell whether the entrepreneur is endowed with project A or B, but cannot stop A from switching to B after A has receive the fund. What is the maximum face value of loan that the bank can lend to A without incur any monitoring costs, i.e., A will not have incentive to switch to B given this incentive compatible amount of loan and limited liability.
Suppose that you found the probabilities and expected NPVs of 3 scenarios for a timing option: E(NPV) probability $0.15 0.30 $10.35 0.50 $42 0.20 1. What is the expected NPV of the timing option? Show your work. 2. Suppose, that the expected NPV of the project if proceeding today is $14. Should the project be delayed based on your finding in part 1 or should the management implement it today? Briefly explain.
Mike Riskless is considering two projects. He has estimated the IRR for each under three possible scenarios and assigned probabilities of occurrence to each scenario. State of Economy Probability Estimated BTIRR Investment I Estimated BTIRR Investment II Optimistic 0.20 0.15 0.20 Most likely 0.60 0.10 0.15 Pessimistic 0.20 0.05 0.05 1.00 Riskless is aware that the pattern of returns for Investment II looks very attractive relative to Investment I; however, he believes that Investment II could be more risky than Investment I. He would like to compare the two investments considering both the risk and return on each. Required: a. Compute BTIRR under each of the three possible scenarios. b. Compute variance and standard deviation of the IRRs.
Consider the following two mutually exclusive projects: When (at what levels of the cost of capital) would choose project A? Cash Flows ($) Project C0 C1 C2 C3 A -90 +60 +50 0 B -100 0 0 +140 Multiple Choice When the cost of capital is less than 9.58% and more than 14.98% When the cost of capital is more than 9.58% and less than 14.98% When the cost of capital is more than 0% and less than 9.58% When the cost of capital is less than 9.58% and mroe than 11.87%
When two mutually exclusive projects are being compared, explain why the short-term project might be ranged higher under the NVP criterion if the cost of the capital is high, whereas the long-term project might be deemed better if the cost of capital is low. Would changes in the cost of capital ever cause a change in the IRR ranking of two such projects? Why or why not?
A company is considering two alternative investment projects both of which have a positive net present value. The projects have been ranked on the basis of both net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR). The result of the ranking is shown below: Project A Project B NPV 1st 2nd IRR 2nd 1st Discuss any four (4) potential reasons why the conflict between the NPV and IRR ranking may have arisen B. Kumi Ltd is considering an investment in a project, which requires immediate payment of GHS15,000, followed by a further investment of GHS5,400 at the end of the first year. The subsequent return phase net cash inflows are expected to arise at the end of the following years: Year 1 2 3 4 5 Cash inflow (GHS) 6,500 7,750 5,750 4,750 3,750 You are required to estimate the internal rate of return of this project assuming the company’s cost of capital of 16%.
You are evaluating the following four projects: Project Beta Projected (or Expected) Return A 1.80 19.5% B 1.20 14.0% C 0.80 11.5% D 0.50 7.0% Your company’s current practice is to apply its WACC of 12% as a single hurdle rate to all projects. Under your company’s current practice, which project(s) of the four projects above would be incorrectly accepted? Currently, the 3-month Treasury bill rate is 3%, and the market risk premium is 10%. (Hint: Measure the RADRs using the CAPM.) Group of answer choices C A D B At least two of the projects are incorrectly accepted.
You are considering the following two mutually exclusive projects. The crossover rate between these two projects is ___ percent and Project ___ should be accepted if the required return is greater than the crossover rate. Year Project A Project B 0 −$ 31,000 −$ 31,000 1 12,000 20,140 2 12,000 10,000 3 20,000 12,160
NPV & IRR Refer to the scenario above. The project(s) you select may vary depending on the WACC and whether the projects are independent or mutually exclusive. Which statement is INCORRECT? If the projects are independent and the WACC is 11.0%, both projects A and B are acceptable. If the projects are independent, Project A would be acceptable if the WACC is 17%, but Project B would not. If a project's NPV is negative, the project cannot be accepted. If the projects are mutually exclusive and the WACC is 11.0%, only project B is acceptable. If the projects are mutually exclusive and the WACC is 6.0%, only project B is acceptable.
Indicate whether its True or False. Then write the explanation! The twin advantages with using the IRR method as opposed to the NPV method for project evaluation is that you don’t need to worry about what an appropriate risk- adjusted discount rate might be for the project and you will always get the correct answer to the investment decision.
In a few sentences, answer the following question as completely as you can. According to your textbook, “an investment should be accepted if the net present value is positive and rejected if it is negative” (p. 239). What does an NPV of zero mean?If you were a financial decision maker facing a project with NPV of zero (or close to zero) what would you do? Can you think of any other factors that might influence your decision?
Consider the following figure. If firm A were to use the average or composite WACC it would Rate of Return 13.0 (5) 11.0 10.0 90 Project L 70 70 Division L's WACC О Riskov Division H's WACC WACC Project H Composite WACC Firm A Risk Riskov O accept Project L and reject Project H O be making the right decisions on acceptance or rejection of both projects O accept both Project L and Project H O reject both Project L and Project H O accept Project H and reject Project L

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Essentials Of Investments

Finance

ISBN:

9781260013924

Author:

Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.

Publisher:

Mcgraw-hill Education,

FUNDAMENTALS OF CORPORATE FINANCE

Finance

ISBN:

9781260013962

Author:

BREALEY

Publisher:

RENT MCG

Financial Management: Theory & Practice

Finance

ISBN:

9781337909730

Author:

Brigham

Publisher:

Cengage

Essentials Of Investments

Finance

ISBN:

9781260013924

Author:

Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.

Publisher:

Mcgraw-hill Education,

FUNDAMENTALS OF CORPORATE FINANCE

Finance

ISBN:

9781260013962

Author:

BREALEY

Publisher:

RENT MCG

Financial Management: Theory & Practice

Finance

ISBN:

9781337909730

Author:

Brigham

Publisher:

Cengage

Foundations Of Finance

Finance

ISBN:

9780134897264

Author:

KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. William

Publisher:

Pearson,

Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou…

Finance

ISBN:

9781337395250

Author:

Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i…

Finance

ISBN:

9780077861759

Author:

Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan Professor

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS