Consider the following scenarios: Case A: The company capitalized costs to inventory that should not have been. As a result, the selling cost of inventory is now lower than the recorded cost. Case B: The selling cost of inventory has declined. The selling price is now lower than the amount capitalized in the inventory account Case C: The company used the FIFO method to account for inventory, but, after review of their competitors, determined that average cost is the standard and a change is made. Case D: The company has made a mandatory change to how it accounts for certain assets, due to amendments to the accounting standard. Case E: The company has begun using data analytics to understand sales patterns and customer returns. As a result of the analysis, the company believes it has recognized too high of a provision for returns over the past 2 years, and the liability is now overstated. Required: Identify whether this is a change in accounting policy, estimate or an error, Determine whether retrospective or prospective treatment is required. Case A Case B Case C Case D Case E Change in estimate, accounting error or change in policy? Prospective or retrospective application?
Consider the following scenarios: Case A: The company capitalized costs to inventory that should not have been. As a result, the selling cost of inventory is now lower than the recorded cost. Case B: The selling cost of inventory has declined. The selling price is now lower than the amount capitalized in the inventory account Case C: The company used the FIFO method to account for inventory, but, after review of their competitors, determined that average cost is the standard and a change is made. Case D: The company has made a mandatory change to how it accounts for certain assets, due to amendments to the accounting standard. Case E: The company has begun using data analytics to understand sales patterns and customer returns. As a result of the analysis, the company believes it has recognized too high of a provision for returns over the past 2 years, and the liability is now overstated. Required: Identify whether this is a change in accounting policy, estimate or an error, Determine whether retrospective or prospective treatment is required. Case A Case B Case C Case D Case E Change in estimate, accounting error or change in policy? Prospective or retrospective application?
Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1Q
Related questions
Question
vj
subject-Accounting
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337272094
Author:
WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337619202
Author:
Hall, James A.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337272094
Author:
WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337619202
Author:
Hall, James A.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…
Accounting
ISBN:
9780134475585
Author:
Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. Rajan
Publisher:
PEARSON
Intermediate Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259722660
Author:
J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M Thomas
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259726705
Author:
John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting Principles
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education