Consider the following information: Firm A: MC₂ = 4/3ea Firm B: MCb = 4eb Under the current command and control approach, both firms can pollute 55 units of emissions. If the regulator wants to introduce an ETS to reduce emissions by 30 units. Determine the following. a) Firm A will abate units. b) Firm B will abate c) The price of the permits would be $ d) If all permits were given to Firm B, Firm B would choose to a total amount of $ units. (buy/sell) permits for

Consider the following information: Firm A: MC₂ = 4/3ea Firm B: MCb = 4eb Under the current command and control approach, both firms can pollute 55 units of emissions. If the regulator wants to introduce an ETS to reduce emissions by 30 units. Determine the following. a) Firm A will abate units. b) Firm B will abate c) The price of the permits would be $ d) If all permits were given to Firm B, Firm B would choose to a total amount of $ units. (buy/sell) permits for

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider a market with two polluting firms with linear marginal abatement cost curves. Firm B has increasing marginal abatement costs that are everywhere half as high as Firm A’s marginal abatement costs. The maximum amount of pollution that can be tolerated is less than the total these two firms would emit if their pollution was unrestricted. Thus some aggregate amount of abatement is necessary. The pollutant in question is uniformly mixing, so it doesn’t matter which firm cuts back how much, only that between them, they cut back by the required total amount. The environmental agency decides to solve the abatement allocation problem by giving out pollution permits in amounts such that each firm would be obliged to cut back their emissions by an equal amount. Would this be “fair”? Would it be “efficient”?
C Consider two polluting firms with the following marginal savings functions; MS, = 20 - e, for firm 1 MS2 = 40 – 2e, for firm 2 Where e and ez are emission levels for firm 1 and 2, respectively. a. Sketch the MS functions on a diagram. b. Derive the total MS function. Draw it on your diagram above. c. The regulator would like to reduce the level of total emissions by 60% from their unregulated level. What is the total reduction in emissions needed? i. If the regulator decides emissions be cut using equiproportionate reduction, how much is each firm required to reduce? Explain whether this would be a cost-effective way to reduce emissions?
The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency investigates how emissions of an environmentally hazardous substance from an industrial sector should be regulated, either through a tax on the emissions or through a quantitative regulation (limit value). As this is a new substance (new substance), knowledge of the level of environmental damage and the costs of reducing emissions is uncertain. In more technical terms: the regulatory authorities do not have complete information on the positions on either the dD / dM curve (marginal damages) or the MAC curve (marginal abatement costs). a) Explain and show graphically whether - and if so how - the uncertainty about the position of the MAC curve affects the choice between regulating emissions with a tax or limit value from a socio-economic efficiency perspective. b) Explain and show graphically whether - and if so how - the uncertainty about the position of the dD / dM curve affects the choice between regulating emissions with a tax or limit…
Suppose that engineers have discovered a new production process for this product which results in a significant positive externality. As a result of the positive externality, for every given output level Marginal Social Value (MSV1) is now higher than consumer’s marginal willingness to pay (also known as the Demand Curve shown as D0 below). Keep in mind that the setting is still that of a monopoly. 1) Please indicate on the graph above, assuming an absence of any government intervention to correct the positive externality and adding any necessary curve(s): The monopoly price P1 and the monopoly quantity Q1 under the condition of the (uncorrected) positive externality. (Also indicate, for comparison purposes, the original monopoly price P0 and monopoly quantity Q0.) The Socially Optimal output, QSO1. The resulting Consumer Surplus CS1, the resulting Producer Surplus PS1, and the size of Dead-Weight Loss DWL1 if there is such a loss. (No need to show the economic profits earned by the…
Lecture: Externality - Pigou8. All-Leather is a tanning company located on Lake Michigan in Chicago. Its total cost functionis C(QA) = 125 + 8QA + 5QA2, where QA is leather production per week in thousands of pounds.a) If leather sells for $408 per thousand pounds, how much leather will All-Leather produce?How much profit does All-leather earn?Enjoy is a beverage company located on Lake Michigan near All-Leather in Chicago. Enjoy’sproduction of beverages is negatively affected by water pollution from All-Leather’s productionof leather. Enjoy’s total cost function to produce beverages isC(QE) = 10QE +3QE2 + 3QA2where QE is Enjoy’s weekly production of beverages, in thousandsof gallons and, as above, QA is All-Leather’s weekly production of leather.b) Is this an example of a pecuniary externality or a real externality? Explain.c) What is the extra cost to Enjoy from an additional thousand tons of leather production by AllLeather (i.e., the external marginal cost of an extra unit of QA…
1. A firm's marginal abatement cost function is given by MAC = 200-5E. Suppose that, after adopting new abatement technology, the firms marginal abatement function becomes MAC = 160-4E. Costs are in dollars per tonne and emissions are in tonnes per year. The firm is given 20 tradeable pollution permits (each permit allows it to emit one tonne of pollution) and the current market price per permit is $100. a)Given no change in the permit price how many tonnes of pollution will the firm emit? b)What will be the firms total abatement cost? Will it buy or sell permits and how many? c) What will be the net cost to the firm after trading? What will be the net gain to the firm from adopting the new abatement technology
See attached image for marginal abatement cost table and question
State whether the fallowing statements is TRUE or FALSE. Explain your reasoning briefly. a) Noise produced by alcraft around an international airport is excudable and rival.
Two power plants operate in the same town. Each plant currently emits 7 tons of emissions per year or 14 tons per year total. The town wishes to reduce emissions to 10 tons per year overall to achieve an abatement target of 4 tons per year. Power plant 1 has marginal abatement costs given by: MC₁ = 12-2A1, Power plant 2 has marginal abatement costs given by: MC2 = 10-A2. Suppose the government wished to cost-effectively achieve the abatement target using a Pigouvian Tax. What tax should the government set to do so? Assume the marginal benefits of abatement are zero.
Gozilla Inc. can generate 100 (CO2) emissions without any regulation. The marginal control cost for Gozilla Inc., associated with emission reduction, is known MC=20+0.5Q where Q is reduced units. Suppose that the regulator impose an emission standard on Gozilla: According to the emission standard, the factory is allowed to emit 40 units. The level of reduction in the emission standard could be accomplished through an emission charge (quantity tax or penalty fee on emission). An emission charge of per emission unit would generate the target amount of reduction. Total (tax) revenue the regulator will collect as emission charges would be Hint: Type integers. Do not use thousands separators.
Consider an industry with two firms that emit a uniformly mixed air pollutant (e.g., carbon dioxide). The marginal abatement cost functions for Firm 1 and Firm 2 are: MAC1 = 100 - e1 MAC2 = 100 - 4e2 Aggregate emissions for the industry are denoted as E = e1 + e2. [1] In an unregulated environment how many units of emissions does each firm emit? Firm 1’s unregulated level of emissions ____________ Firm 2’s unregulated level of emissions ____________ Total unregulated level of emissions ______________
Firms within the country of Anviliania are currently emitting pollutants. These pollutants cause damages within Anviliania. However, the pollutants also cause damages to the properties and health of residents of countries that share borders with Anviliania. The Marginal Abatement Costs of the firms in Anviliania can be represented by the equation MAC(Anvil.) = 750 -2.3 e The Marginal Damage Costs to the residents of Anviliania are given by MDC (Anvil.) =- - 40 + 10 e The Marginal Damage Costs to all residents (including the residents of Anviliania) are MDC (Globe) = -20+ 12 e a. Draw a diagram representing this situation. b. Determine the magnitude of the local market failure and the global market failure. c. Suppose that the Anvilianian government has given production subsidies to the firms in Anviliania. As a result, the firms have increased production (and the number of firms have increased.). Consequently, the aggregate MAC is now MAC' (Anvil.) = 800 - 2.3 e. Determine the…