Consider the following example, which follows the analytical framework of Goldin and Katz(2008).a) Suppose the economy uses just two inputs, capital (K) and labor (L). If the cost of each unit ofcapital (what we called the rental rate, r) is $10 and the cost of each unit of labor (the wage rate,w) is $20, and the economy spends $100 total in costs of production, draw the isocost curve forthe economy with capital on the y-axis.b) Based upon (a) above, depict an isoquant where, at the optimal production mix, the economy usestwice as much labor as it does capital.c) Now, on the same graph, illustrate technological change that is capital-biased. Another term forthis is "labor saving" technical change. Based upon your depiction of the technological change,identify the new optimal input mix - has it indeed been "labor saving"?d) If the capital/labor ratio does not fully adjust as you depicted in part (c), what will be theimplication for the w/r ratio? If, as is the case in the US, most capital is owned by the relativelywell off and the relatively poor rely on income from their labor, what would be the implicationfor economic inequality?

Given information There are 2 inputs: Capital and labor wage rate=$20 Rental rate of the capital=$10…

Consider the following example, which follows the analytical framework of Goldin and Katz (2008). a) Suppose the economy uses just two inputs, capital (K) and labor (L). If the cost of each unit of capital (what we called the rental rate, r) is $10 and the cost of each unit of labor (the wage rate, w) is $20, and the economy spends $100 total in costs of production, draw the isocost curve for the economy with capital on the y-axis. b) Based upon (a) above, depict an isoquant where, at the optimal production mix, the economy uses twice as much labor as it does capital.

Consider the following example, which follows the analytical framework of Goldin and Katz (2008). a) Suppose the economy uses just two inputs, capital (K) and labor (L). If the cost of each unit of capital (what we called the rental rate, r) is $10 and the cost of each unit of labor (the wage rate, w) is $20, and the economy spends $100 total in costs of production, draw the isocost curve for the economy with capital on the y-axis. b) Based upon (a) above, depict an isoquant where, at the optimal production mix, the economy uses twice as much labor as it does capital.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Nia's Pizzas is a takeout-only pizza parlor servicing the college campus of Tallahassee that specializes in vegan pizzas. Nia's small shop has barely enough room for customers to stand and wait, let alone the five pizza ovens necessary to keep up with the hungry student customers. Nia signed a lease renting both the five ovens and the storefront for the next year. Due to the terms of the lease and the building's size constraint, Nia is unable to change the store's number of pizza ovens in the short run. However, Nia does face a decision regarding the number of employees to schedule on a weekly basis. Every Sunday, Nia contacts the staff to communicate the amount of workers needed on each day of the upcoming week. In the short run, the store employees are inputs, and pizza ovens are inputs. The following table presents Nia's daily production schedule. Fill in the blanks to complete the Marginal Product of Labor column for each worker. Output Marginal Product of Labor (Pizzas) Labor…
A firm’s total expenditure E on inputs is determined by the formula E = PKK + PLL where K is the amount of input K used, L is the amount of input L used, PK is the price per unit of K and PL is the price per unit of L. Is one unique value for E determined by any given set of values for K, L, PK and PL? Does this mean that any one particular value for E must always correspond to the same set of values for K, L, PK and PL?
I am having trouble understanding how to answer the last part of this question. I am providing the work I did on the remainder of the problem to provide context, but the multiple choice question is what I'm stuck on. If you see an error in my previous work that would cause me to have trouble with this last question, please let me know and I will fix it. Thank you!
Suppose that land is specific to corn, capital is specific to automobiles, labor is mobile between sectors, and payments are as follows: Sales revenue = 400; payments to labor = 100; payments to capital = 300 Corn:Sales revenue = 300; payments to labor = 250; payments to land = 50. Holding the price of automobiles constant, suppose the increase in the price of corn is 10% and the increase in the wage is 5%. What is the impact of this on the rental of land and the rental of capital?
Suppose the production function for widgets is given by: Q = f (K, L) = 2 ∗ KL − K2/2 − L2/2 (a) Suppose L=5 (is fixed), derive an expression for and graph the total product of capital curve (the production function for a fixed level of labor) and the average productivity of capital curve. (b) At what level of capital input does the average productivity reach a maximum? How many widgets are produced at this point? (c) Again, assuming L=5, derive an expression for and graph the MPK curve. At what level of capital input does MPK =0? (d) Does this production function exhibit constant, increasing or decreasing returns to scale?
Problem 1. Costs for Sedate Sedan, Inc. (adapted from Nicholson). Sedate Sedan, Inc. uses robots and workers to assemble automobiles. There is a diminishing rate of technical substitution between robots and labour: robots do well at tasks that are purely repetitive, while labour does better at jobs that are less boring and require more thought. The various combinations of hours of robot use (r) and hours of labour use (1) needed to assemble sedans are described by the Cobb-Douglas production function: q = f(r,l) = ²√√√² 50 Note that marginal products for this production function are given by: MP: = 1 √r MP₁ Please make sure you know how to calculate them. This production function 100 Vi exhibits diminishing marginal products: the marginal product of robots decreases when more robots are used; the marginal product of labour decreases when more labour is used. The company can rent all the robots it wants for v = 40 dollars per hour and hire all the workers it wants at w = 40 dollars per…
Assume instead that pharmacists and robots dispense prescriptions according to the following production function: Y = 10*KO.8L0.2 where Y is the number of prescriptions dispensed; L is the number pharmacist hours, and K is the number of robot hours. In addition, $10 worth of materials is used for each prescription. a. What is this type of production function called, and what are we assuming about the relationship between robots and pharmacists by using this production function? b. Derive the cost - minimizing demands for K and L as a function of output, the wage rate and the rental rate of capital. c. Use these results to derive the total cost function: costs as a function of y, r, w, and the $10 materials cost. d. Pharmacists earn $32 per hour. The rental rate for robots is $64 per hour. What are total costs as a function of Y? e. Does this technology exhibit decreasing, constant, or increasing returns to scale?f. The pharmacy plans to produce 40,000 prescriptions per week. At the…
thankyou
QUESTION THREE: PRODUCER THEORY 1. Suppose the production function for automobiles is given by q = kl - 0.8k² - 0.21² where q represents the annual quantity of bicycles produced, k represents annual capital input, and I represents annual labor input. a) Suppose k=10; graph the total and average productivity of labor curves. At what level of labor input does this average productivity reach a maximum? How many cars are produced at that point? b) Again, assuming k=10, graph the MP curve. At what level of labor input does MP₁ = 0 c) Suppose capital inputs were increased to k-20. How would your answer to parts (a) and (b) change? d) Does the production of automobiles exhibit constant, increasing, or decreasing returns to scale? 2. Supposing that the firm in (1) is a competitive firm and its production function is y = 10 + (x - 1,000)¹/3. The price of the input x is w = 1. (a) Show that the firm's total cost curve is C(y) = 1,000 + (-10)³. (b) Show that the minimum of the marginal cost curve…
In economics and econometrics, the Cobb-Douglas production function is a particular functional form of ne production function, widely used to represent the technological relationship between the amounts of two r more inputs (particularly physical capital and labor) and the amount of output that can be produced by nose inputs. The function they used to model production is defined by, P(L, K) = 6LªK!-a where P is the total production (the monetary value of all goods produced in a year), L is the amount f labor (the total number of person-hours worked in a year), and K is the amount of capital invested (the onetary worth of all machinery, equipment, and buildings). Its domain is {(L, k)|L > 0, K > 0} because L nd K represent labor and capital and are therefore never negative. Show that the Cobb-Douglas production function can be written as P P(L, K) = 6LªK1-a → In K L In b+ a ln K
Answer the Constrained Optimization: Cobb-Douglas Production Function:3. Solve for the formulas of the Marginal Product of Labor (MPL), and Marginal product of Capital (MPK)4. Using your knowledge of the tangency condition in Producer’s theory, find the combination of K and L that the firm should use to produce the maximum possible output. Do not solve the problem using the Lagrangian method.Note: The tangency conditions just states that the slope of the production function must beequal to the slope of the isocost function.5. What is the maximum possible output that the firm could earn given the constraint it faces
Let y = f(x1, x2)=x11/2 + x1x2 be a firm’s production function, where x1≥0, x2≥0. Write down the firm’s production possibility set, and its input requirement set. Is this production function concave, quasi-concave? Is this production function homogenous? Find its returns to scale when x1=1, and x2=1.