Consider the following estimated regression model relating annual salary to years of education and work experience. Estimated Salary=11,681.31+3418.97(Education)+1194.78(Experience) Suppose two employees at the company have been working there for five years. One has a bachelor's degree (8 years of education) and one has a master's degree (10 years of education). How much more money would we expect the employee with a master's degree to make?

Consider the following estimated regression model relating annual salary to years of education and work experience. Estimated Salary=11,681.31+3418.97(Education)+1194.78(Experience) Suppose two employees at the company have been working there for five years. One has a bachelor's degree (8 years of education) and one has a master's degree (10 years of education). How much more money would we expect the employee with a master's degree to make?

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)

14th Edition

ISBN:9781305506381

Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Publisher:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Chapter4: Estimating Demand

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1.4CE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the following estimated regression model relating annual salary to years of education and work experience. Estimated Salary=11,722.40+3182.56(Education)+1202.44(Experience)Estimated Salary=11,722.40+3182.56(Education)+1202.44(Experience) Suppose an employee with 66 years of education has been with the company for 33 years (note that education years are the number of years after 8th8th grade). According to this model, what is his estimated annual salary?
In this question we look at the relation between the logarithm of weakly earnings and years of education. Using data from the national longitudinal study of youth, we find the following results for a regression of log weekly earnings and years of education, experience, experience squared and an intercept: Log (earnings) = 4.016 + 0.092 . educi + 0.079 .expei + 0.002 . experi 2 ( 0.222) ( 0.008) ( 0.025) (0.001) c). Labour economist studying the relation between education and earnings are often concerned about what they call “ability bias”. Suppose that individuals differ in ability, and that the correct specification of the regression function is one that includes ability: log ( earnings )I = β1 + β 2 ⋅ educI + β 3 ⋅ experI − β 4 ⋅ experI2 + β5 ⋅ abilityI + εI . In this regression, what do you expect the sign of β5 (the coefficient on ability) to be?
QUESTION 17 I am trying to figure out how to measure an athlete's productivity. So, I have run a linear regression of a NBA player's salary (dependent variable) on a player's statistics including average points, assists, rebounds per game, and turnovers per game (the independent variables). The final model is: Salary = 1,000,000 * Points per game + 50,000 * Assists per game + 20,000 * Rebounds per game - 30,000 * Turnovers per game %3! Last year, Lebron James averaged 25 points per game, 8 assists per game, 8 rebounds per game and 4 turnovers per game. What is Lebron's predicted salary?
Suppose you run a regression with quantity as your dependent variable and advertising as one of your independent variables. The p-value on advertising is .08. The marketing team is arguing that their advertising efforts are impacting sales, but the finance/economics department is arguing that there isn't evidence that the advertising is impacting sales. What side would you take and why?
13. Collinearity in a multiple regression analysis Suppose you want to examine the effects of a training program on future earnings using the following model: earn98= 4.64 +2.376train +0.371earn96 +0.366educ- 1.86 age +2.534 married (1.14) (0.43) (0.016) (0.062) (0.013) (0.4) where earn 98- 1998 earnings, in thousands of dollars train -1 if the individual participated in the training program, and =0 otherwise earn 96- 1996 earnings, in thousands of dollars educ years of education age = age, in years married-1 if the individual is married, and -0 otherwise Suppose that there is a high degree of correlation (but not perfect) between earnings in 1996, education, age, and marital status. True or False: We should be concerned about this high degree of correlation because it affects our ability to reliably estimate the impact of the training program on 1998 earnings, T. True False
2. Suppose you run a regression with quantity as your dependent variable and advertising as one of your independent variables. The p-value on advertising is .08. The marketing team is arguing that their advertising efforts are impacting sales, but the finance/economics department is arguing that there isn’t evidence that the advertising is impacting sales. What side would you take and why? Note that this question squarely hits the idea that stats is part science/part art...
Please answer fast
Suppose you run the following regression: outcome=alpha0 + alpha1*female + alpha2*married + epsilon. You know that female equals 1 for females and 0 otherwise. You know that married equals 1 if the person is married and 0 otherwise. What is the estimated outcome for married females?
Suppose you run the following regression: outcome=alpha0 + alpha1*female + alpha2*married + epsilon. You know that female equals 1 for females and 0 otherwise. You know that married equals 1 if the person is married and 0 otherwise. What is the estimated outcome for non-married females?
How should I interpret the coefficients on a regression with a naural log of a dependent variable? Ex: Ln(wage)=B1+B2Experience+B3Male...+Ui
Oil Recovery A U.S. state's Bureau of Economic Geology published a study on the economic impact of using carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technology to extract additional oil from fields that have reached the end of their conventional economic life. The following table gives the approximate number of jobs for the citizens that would be created at various levels of recovery. Percent Recovery (%) 20 40 80 100 Jobs Created (Millions) 6 6 12 18 Find the regression line. j(r) = Use the regression line to estimate the number of jobs (in millions) that would be created at a recovery level of 50%. million jobs
Image attached