Consider a Keynesian model of the economy with the following equations;C = 300 + 0.7Yd= 500TRァミ250= 300= 400X 150M = 0,2YThe equilibrium level of income isO €1,500€2,720€2,650O €1,325

The equilibrium level of income refers to that level of income at which the aggregate supply of an…

Consider a Keynesian model of the economy with the following equations; C = 300 + 0.7Yd = 500 TR 250 T. %3D = 300 - = 400 = 150 M= 0.2Y The equilibrium level of income is €1,500 €2,720 €2,650 €1,325

Consider a Keynesian model of the economy with the following equations; C = 300 + 0.7Yd = 500 TR 250 T. %3D = 300 - = 400 = 150 M= 0.2Y The equilibrium level of income is €1,500 €2,720 €2,650 €1,325

Economics (MindTap Course List)

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337617383

Author:Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:Roger A. Arnold

Chapter10: Keynesian Macroeconomics And Economic Instability: A Critique Of The Self Regulating Economy

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8QP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

what is the equilibrium income in this IS-LM model? Y = C +I +GC = 200+0.8(Y-T )I = 1,600-100ｒ G =T = 1,000MS= 5,000 P =2MD/P= 0.5Y - 250ｒ +500 ➀ 5000 ➁ 6000 ➂ 7000 ➃ 8000 ➄ 10000 Please type out the correct answer ASAP within 40 min with proper explanation of the each option given. Will give you thumbs up only for the correct answer.
Please answer fast please help
Consider an economy that is characterized by the following equations: C= 400 + 0.5 Yd I = 700 - 4000i + 0.1y G= 200 T= 200 (M/P)d - = 0.75Y - 7500€ (MP)== 600 What is the equilibrium consumption (C)?
In the Keynesian macroeconomic model, the equation for the savings function is given as: S = -420 + 1/4Y. Based on this information, which of the following statements is correct? (1) The marginal propensity to consume is 1/4;(2) The marginal propensity to save is -420; (3) At an income level of R1 000, the value of savings is 250;(4) At an income level of R1 000, the level of savings is -170.
Q.1.7 In the Keynesian macroeconomic model, the equation for the savings function is given as: S = -420 + 1/4Y. Based on this information, which of the following statements is correct? (1) The marginal propensity to consume is 1/4; (2) The marginal propensity to save is -420;
The following is a hypothetical estimate of a demand curve for butter over the period 2001–10. Qa = 145 – 1.5P- 0.001Y+ 2P. Where Qa is the quantity of butter sold in grams per person per week; Pis the price of butter (in pence per kg, at 2000 prices); Yis the anmual disposable income per head (in £s at 2000 prices); Pa is the price of margarine (in pence per kg, at 2000 prices). (a) If P is 50 pence, Yis £20 000 and P is 40 pence, what is the estimated value of Qa? (b) If the price of butter went up by 6 pence per kilo, all other things equal, what would happen to the estimated demand for butter? (c) Going back to the original price of 50 pence, if the value of Y now rose to £22,000 what would happen to the estimated demand for butter? (d) What is the income elasticity of demand for butter according to your calculations in (c)? What sort of good is butter according to this result? (e) Again, going back to the original demand, if the price of margarine now rose by 10 pence what would…
If the government expenditures decrease by 100 million Euro and the aggregate demand decreases by 400, then the marginal propensity to consume is:
The chart below gives the data necessary to make a Keynesian cross diagram. Assume that the tax rate is 0.4 of national income, the MPC out of after-tax income is 0.9, investment is 58, government spending is 60, exports are 40, and imports are 0.1 of after-tax income. National Income Minus After-tax ConsumptionI+G+X income Aggregate Expenditures Imports 100 104 200 300 400 500 600 What does consumption equal when income equals 600?
Disposable income - 200, 225, 250, 275, 300Consumption - 205, 225, 245, 265, 285 Refer to the above data. The marginal propensity to consume is;
Given this model, what would be the new equi8librium level of income were Investment spending to decline by 50?
10 . In the “complete Keynesian model”, the investment functions was I = I0 - f(i). An analyst now proposes the following investment function: I = I0 - f(i) + qY, where “q” is a parameter and Y is national income = GDP. Provide two different arguments, i.e. explanations as to why this investment function makes sense. The focus is on the new term, qY (q times Y), in the function.
The collective market capitalization of stock in American companies increased from $34 trillion at the end of 2019 to $41 trillion at the end of 2020. Not all of the stock is owned by American consumers but for this problem pretend that it is. If the marginal propensity to consume stock wealth is 0.01 then how much would we expect consumption spending to increase due to the increase in the stock wealth? $ billion