Consider a finite-state transducer M with input language Min and output language Møut · It isguaranteed that there exists a deterministic finite-state acceptor D that accepts exactly thelanguage Min U Mout (the union of Min and Mout).O TrueFalse Consider the two regular languages L and L2 below:L = {the dog, the cat, the mouse}andL2 = {runs}%3DThere cannot be a finite-state transducer with input language L1 and output language L2, sinceL contains three strings and L2 contains only one string.TrueFalse

Consider a finite-state transducer M with input language Min and output language Mout · It is guaranteed that there exists a deterministic finite-state acceptor D that accepts exactly the language Min U Mout (the union of Min and Mout). O True False

Consider a finite-state transducer M with input language Min and output language Mout · It is guaranteed that there exists a deterministic finite-state acceptor D that accepts exactly the language Min U Mout (the union of Min and Mout). O True False

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Draw and write out the transition functions for a 2-tape Turing machine that recognizes the language {w#w|w ∈ {0, 1} ∗ }.
Given N = (Q, {a, b}, δ, q0, F) is an NFA that recognizes language L. Define a new language concatenate(L) that is formed by concatenating symbol a to the end of every string in L. That is, concatenatea(L) = {wa | w ∈ L(N)}. Please construct an NFA N′ with exactly one accepting state that recognizes language concatenate(L). All you need to do is fill in the missing parts in the definition below. N′ = (Q′ , {a, b}, δ′ , q′ 0 , F′ ) where (a) Q′ = (b) q ′ 0 = (c) F ′ = (d) δ ′ is defined as follows:
2. Let A be a Turing-recognizable language consisting of descriptions of Turing machines, i.e., A = {(M1), (M2),...}, where every M; is a decider. Prove that some decidable language D is not decided by any decider M, whose description appears in A.
Let A be the language of binary strings of even length that are also palindromes. That is, A is a language over the alphabet S={0,1} and win A if and only if the length of w is even and w is equal to the reverse of w. Use the pumping lemma for regular languages to prove that A is not regular.
For each of the following regular expressions over Σ = {a, b}, state 5 strings that are in the language of the regular expression, and 5 strings that are not. 1. (a∗b)∗|a∗2. (Σ∗aaΣ∗)|(Σ∗bbΣ∗)|(ab)∗|(ba)∗|a|b
Consider the problem of the equivalence of the languages of two DFAs, formulate it as a language, and prove that language is Turing decidable by testing the two DFAs on all strings up to a certain size. Calculate a size will work for it.
Show that if M is a DFA that recognizes language A, swapping the accept and nonaccept states in Myields a DFA that recognizes the complement of A. Show that the class of regular languages is closedunder complement.
I need correct figure with answer only upvote otherwise more downvotes I give u
Consider the Deterministic Finite-state Automaton (DFA) A shown below. The DFA runs on the alphabet {0, 1}, and has the set of states {s, p, q, r}, with s being the start state and p being the only final state. S 1 Ρ 1 1 0 0 r 0,1
The finite state automaton given by the transition diagram above has The accepting state is N(s1, 1) = N*(s1, 00010) Is the string 010 accepted? Is the string 1001 accepted? is the string 1111 accepted? A string S is in the language accepted by the automaton if and only if N*(s0, S) = The language accepted by the automaton can be described by the regular expression