CLOSING CASE THE EVOLVING STRATEGY IBM IBM's CEO, Sam Palmisano, likes to talk about the evolution of global strategy at one of the world's largest computer enterprises. According to Palmi- sano, when IBM first started to expand interna- tionally, it did so in the classic "international" pattern of many enterprises, undertaking most of its activities at home, and selling its products internationally through overseas sales offices. By the time Palmisano joined IBM in 1972, however, it had already moved away from this model, and was by then a classic "multinational" enterprise, with small branches in major national markets around the world. This structure made sense for IBM in the 1970s, given that many markets were still segmented from each other by high barriers to cross border trade, and given that national differ- ences in business practices often required consid- erable localization. In recent decades, however, IBM has been mov- ing away from this model and toward one that Palmisano characterizes as a "globally integrated enterprise." In his words: "We are locating work and operations anywhere in the world based on economics, expertise, and the right business en- vironment. We are integrating those operations horizontally and globally. We use to have separate supply chains in different markets. Now we have one supply chain, a global one. Our R&D has been global for many years, with research and software development carried out in labs around the world. But in our professional services businesses, where we use to think about our human capital-our people-in terms of countries, and regions, and business units, we now manage and deploy them as one global asset." Thus today's IBM locates its semiconductor R&D and manufacturing operations in upstate New York and Vermont, and its global procure- ment center is in China. Global services delivery is in India, while many of the services that support IBM's external and internal Websites are in places like Ireland and Brazil. The people at each of these centers are not focused on their national markets; they are leading integrated global operations. This strategic shift was a response to three things; the globalization of the world economy, the global nature of many of IBM's customers, who were shifting towards a global integration strategy, and the emergence of fierce competition from en- terprises in emerging markets such as China and India. India is a good example; in the 1990s a trio of Indian outsourcing firms, Tata Consulting Services, Infosys, and Wipro started to take share away from IBM in its core information technology services business. The Indians enjoyed an advan- vage based on a large supply of highly educated, but relative inexpensive, engineering, and manage- rial talent. IBM felt that to compete, it needed to adopt the low cost model being pioneered in In- dia. In the mid-2000s, it bought Daksh, an Indian firm that was a smaller version of India's big three information technology services firms. IBM has invested heavily in its Indian unit, building it into a large global business with leading market share that now effectively competes on cost and quality against its Indian rivals. While Palmisano notes that the original motivation for expanding in India was to gain access to low cost labor, he argues that the skill base in India is just as important now-if not more so. IBM can find a large supply of highly skilled people in India who can staff its global ser- vices operations, and move seamlessly around the world. It doesn't hurt that most Indians have a good command of the English language, which has become the de facto language of business in much of the world. e Looking forward, Palmisano stresses that IBM is still fairly early in its journey to become a fully integrated global enterprise. The big thrust going forward will be on developing the human capital of the enterprise-helping to produce managers and engineers who see themselves as global professionals and global citizens, who are able to move effortlessly around the world, and do business effectively in a wide range of national contexts.3 Case Discussion Questions ur nd 1. In the 197Os and 1980s Palmisano states that IBM was organized as a classic multinational enterprise. What does this mean? Why do you think IBM was organized that way? What were the advantages of this kind of strategic orientation? 2. By the 1990s, the classic multinational strategic orien- tation was no longer working well for IBM. Why not? em 3. What are the strategic advantages of IBM's glob- ally integrated enterprise strategy? What kind of organizational changes do you think had to be made at IBM to make this strategy a reality? 4. According to the strategic choice framework in- troduced in this chapter, what strategy do you think IBM is pursuing today? "or ite re- is ort

Understanding Business
12th Edition
ISBN:9781259929434
Author:William Nickels
Publisher:William Nickels
Chapter1: Taking Risks And Making Profits Within The Dynamic Business Environment
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1CE
icon
Related questions
Question

what the answer or solution based on the question?

CLOSING CASE
THE EVOLVING STRATEGY IBM
IBM's CEO, Sam Palmisano, likes to talk about the
evolution of global strategy at one of the world's
largest computer enterprises. According to Palmi-
sano, when IBM first started to expand interna-
tionally, it did so in the classic "international"
pattern of many enterprises, undertaking most
of its activities at home, and selling its products
internationally through overseas sales offices. By
the time Palmisano joined IBM in 1972, however,
it had already moved away from this model, and
was by then a classic "multinational" enterprise,
with small branches in major national markets
around the world. This structure made sense for
IBM in the 1970s, given that many markets were
still segmented from each other by high barriers to
cross border trade, and given that national differ-
ences in business practices often required consid-
erable localization.
In recent decades, however, IBM has been mov-
ing away from this model and toward one that
Palmisano characterizes as a “globally integrated
enterprise." In his words: "We are locating work
and operations anywhere in the world based on
economics, expertise, and the right business en-
vironment. We are integrating those operations /Nage based on a large supply of highly educated,
horizontally and globally. We use to have separate
supply chains in different markets. Now we have
one supply chain, a global one. Our R&D has been
global for many years, with research and software
development carried out in labs around the world.
But in our professional services businesses, where
we use to think about our human capital-our
people-in terms of countries, and regions, and
business units, we now manage and deploy them
as one global asset."
Thus today's IBM locates its semiconductor
R&D and manufacturing operations in upstate
New York and Vermont, and its global procure-
ment center is in China. Global services delivery is
in India, while many of the services that support
IBM's external and internal Websites are in places
like Ireland and Brazil. The people at each of these
centers are not focused on their national markets;
they are leading integrated global operations.
This strategic shift was a response to three
things; the globalization of the world economy, the
global nature of many of IBM's customers, who
were shifting towards a global integration strategy,
and the emergence of fierce competition from en-
terprises in emerging markets such as China and
India. India is a good example; in the 1990s a
trio of Indian outsourcing firms, Tata Consulting
Services, Infosys, and Wipro started to take share
away from IBM in its core information technology
services business. The Indians enjoyed an advan-
but relative inexpensive, engineering, and manage-
rial talent. IBM felt that to compete, it needed to
adopt the low cost model being pioneered in In-
dia. In the mid-2000s, it bought Daksh, an Indian
firm that was a smaller version of India's big three
information technology services firms. IBM has
invested heavily in its Indian unit, building it into
a large global business with leading market share
that now effectively competes on cost and quality
against its Indian rivals. While Palmisano notes
that the original motivation for expanding in India
was to gain access to low cost labor, he argues that
the skill base in India is just as important now-if
not more so. IBM can find a large supply of highly
skilled people in India who can staff its global ser-
vices operations, and move seamlessly around the
world. It doesn't hurt that most Indians have a
become the de facto language of business in much
of the world.
Looking forward, Palmisano stresses that
IBM is still fairly early in its journey to become a
fully integrated global enterprise. The big thrust
going forward will be on developing the human
capital of the enterprise-helping to produce
managers and engineers who see themselves as
global professionals and global citizens, who
are able to move effortlessly around the world,
and do business effectively in a wide range of
national contexts.43
good command of the English language, which has
Case Discussion Questions
ur
nd
em
1. In the 1970s and 1980s Palmisano states that IBM
was organized as a classic multinational enterprise.
What does this mean? Why do you think IBM was
organized that way? What were the advantages of
this kind of strategic orientation?
2. By the 1990s, the classic multinational strategic orien-
tation was no longer working well for IBM. Why not?
3. What are the strategic advantages of IBM's glob-
ally integrated enterprise strategy? What kind of
organizational changes do you think had to be
made at IBM to make this strategy a reality?
4. According to the strategic choice framework in-
troduced in this chapter, what strategy do you
think IBM is pursuing today?
or
ite
re-
is
ort
es
Transcribed Image Text:CLOSING CASE THE EVOLVING STRATEGY IBM IBM's CEO, Sam Palmisano, likes to talk about the evolution of global strategy at one of the world's largest computer enterprises. According to Palmi- sano, when IBM first started to expand interna- tionally, it did so in the classic "international" pattern of many enterprises, undertaking most of its activities at home, and selling its products internationally through overseas sales offices. By the time Palmisano joined IBM in 1972, however, it had already moved away from this model, and was by then a classic "multinational" enterprise, with small branches in major national markets around the world. This structure made sense for IBM in the 1970s, given that many markets were still segmented from each other by high barriers to cross border trade, and given that national differ- ences in business practices often required consid- erable localization. In recent decades, however, IBM has been mov- ing away from this model and toward one that Palmisano characterizes as a “globally integrated enterprise." In his words: "We are locating work and operations anywhere in the world based on economics, expertise, and the right business en- vironment. We are integrating those operations /Nage based on a large supply of highly educated, horizontally and globally. We use to have separate supply chains in different markets. Now we have one supply chain, a global one. Our R&D has been global for many years, with research and software development carried out in labs around the world. But in our professional services businesses, where we use to think about our human capital-our people-in terms of countries, and regions, and business units, we now manage and deploy them as one global asset." Thus today's IBM locates its semiconductor R&D and manufacturing operations in upstate New York and Vermont, and its global procure- ment center is in China. Global services delivery is in India, while many of the services that support IBM's external and internal Websites are in places like Ireland and Brazil. The people at each of these centers are not focused on their national markets; they are leading integrated global operations. This strategic shift was a response to three things; the globalization of the world economy, the global nature of many of IBM's customers, who were shifting towards a global integration strategy, and the emergence of fierce competition from en- terprises in emerging markets such as China and India. India is a good example; in the 1990s a trio of Indian outsourcing firms, Tata Consulting Services, Infosys, and Wipro started to take share away from IBM in its core information technology services business. The Indians enjoyed an advan- but relative inexpensive, engineering, and manage- rial talent. IBM felt that to compete, it needed to adopt the low cost model being pioneered in In- dia. In the mid-2000s, it bought Daksh, an Indian firm that was a smaller version of India's big three information technology services firms. IBM has invested heavily in its Indian unit, building it into a large global business with leading market share that now effectively competes on cost and quality against its Indian rivals. While Palmisano notes that the original motivation for expanding in India was to gain access to low cost labor, he argues that the skill base in India is just as important now-if not more so. IBM can find a large supply of highly skilled people in India who can staff its global ser- vices operations, and move seamlessly around the world. It doesn't hurt that most Indians have a become the de facto language of business in much of the world. Looking forward, Palmisano stresses that IBM is still fairly early in its journey to become a fully integrated global enterprise. The big thrust going forward will be on developing the human capital of the enterprise-helping to produce managers and engineers who see themselves as global professionals and global citizens, who are able to move effortlessly around the world, and do business effectively in a wide range of national contexts.43 good command of the English language, which has Case Discussion Questions ur nd em 1. In the 1970s and 1980s Palmisano states that IBM was organized as a classic multinational enterprise. What does this mean? Why do you think IBM was organized that way? What were the advantages of this kind of strategic orientation? 2. By the 1990s, the classic multinational strategic orien- tation was no longer working well for IBM. Why not? 3. What are the strategic advantages of IBM's glob- ally integrated enterprise strategy? What kind of organizational changes do you think had to be made at IBM to make this strategy a reality? 4. According to the strategic choice framework in- troduced in this chapter, what strategy do you think IBM is pursuing today? or ite re- is ort es
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Forecasting methods
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, management and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Understanding Business
Understanding Business
Management
ISBN:
9781259929434
Author:
William Nickels
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)
Management (14th Edition)
Management
ISBN:
9780134527604
Author:
Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
Publisher:
PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract…
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract…
Management
ISBN:
9781305947412
Author:
Cliff Ragsdale
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi…
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi…
Management
ISBN:
9780135191798
Author:
Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
Publisher:
PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in…
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in…
Management
ISBN:
9780134728391
Author:
Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
Publisher:
PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Management
ISBN:
9780134237473
Author:
Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
Publisher:
PEARSON