Clara has utility function preferences u(x, y) = x^(1/2)+ you ^(1/2). She has income m = 48 and pays pX= 4, pY= 2. Now pX falls to 2. Provide a labeled diagram that decomposes this price change using the Slutsky decomposition SE (A to B) and TE (B to C) and the Hicksian decomposition SE (A to H) and TE (H to C).

Clara has utility function preferences u(x, y) = x^(1/2)+ you ^(1/2). She has income m = 48 and pays pX= 4, pY= 2. Now pX falls to 2. Provide a labeled diagram that decomposes this price change using the Slutsky decomposition SE (A to B) and TE (B to C) and the Hicksian decomposition SE (A to H) and TE (H to C).

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

5.6. Bunde's preferences are given by the utility function u(x1, x2) = x1 + X2. For each of the following cases, decompose the price effects into the substitution and income effects using either the Hicks-Allen or Slutsky decompositions. - (a) Suppose m = 120, p₁ = 12, and p2 P1 5, keeping p2 and m fixed. (b) Suppose m = 100, P1 = 20. The price p₁ then falls to = 20, and p2 = 10. The price p₁ then falls to 5, keeping p2 and m fixed.
Need help for questions d),e),f)
Two friends, Karol and Manuel, like to drink kombucha (x₁) and matcha (x₂). Both X₁ and X2 are expressed in ounces. The following utility function represents Karol's preferences: 1 1 2 2 u (x1, x2) = x1 x3 The following utility function represents Manuel's preferences: u (x₁, x2) = √√x1 + x2 Karol's income in dollars is denoted by mk, and Manuel's income is denoted by mm. Both face the same prices in the market, denoted by p₁ and p2, for kombucha and matcha, respectively. Both prices are expressed in dollars per ounce. Assume p₂=1 throughout the whole question. 1) Draw Karol's and Manuel's indifference curves in separate graphs and describe any important similarities or differences between the two.
Derive Ryan's demand function for q₁, given his utility function is where o = = (9₁) P + (9₂)P, 1 1-p The demand curve for q₁ as a function of P₁, P2, and Y is (Properly format your expression using the tools in the palette. Hover over tools to see keyboard shortcuts. E.g., a subscript can be created with the_ 9₁ = character.) U= Let the price of q₁ be p₁, let the price of q2 be p2, and let income be Y.
Laura's preferences over commodities X₁ and x₂ can be represented by U(x₁,x2)=min{3x₁, x₂}. She maximizes her utility subject to her budget constraint. Suppose there is an increase in p1. There are both income and substitution effects of this price change. There is an income effect but not a substitution effect of this price change. There is a substitution effect but not an income effect of this price change. It is unclear whether the consumer will buy more or less x1 as a result of the increase in p1.
A consumer’s preferences over pizza (x) and steak (y) are given by u(x,y) = x2y (HINT: MUx = 2xy and MUy = x2) and his income is I = $120 and py = $1. (a) Calculate his optimal bundle when pX = $8 (call this bundle A) and separately when pX = $1 (call this point C). (b) Finding the decomposition bundle B, calculate the income and substitution effects on the amount of pizza of a decrease in the price of pizza from pX = $8 down to pX = $1. (c) Forget about the decomposition bundle and the two effects. In (a), the price of pizza decreases, hence the agent ends up better off. Let’s quantify how much “better off” the agent becomes after this price drop, in dollars. For this, instead of the price drop, suppose the agent is given some money $m and he optimize utility with this additional gift included to his budget. What should m be, so that his optimal utility with his expanded budget is exactly equal to his utility at the bundle C (the bundle he chooses optimally when pizza price drops to…