Case Analysis 1. in 1982, XYZ cement company began its plant operation in Pampanga. Local residents were very happy because of the economic benefits they got from the plant especially the 400 local residents employed. After a few years of operation, Local Residents noticed the constant vibration and loud noise coming from the plant. Local residents filed a suit against the company asking the court to issue an injunction to close the plant. The residents claimed that the loud noise and the vibrations posed dangers to their health and damaged their property. The company was using the best available technology in their operation. The court refused to issue the injunction arguing that closing the plant would mean more harm than good to both parties. The court instead ruled that the company should pay the residents a one-time fee to compensate them for the damages done. The amount was computed based on the fair market price residents would receive if they were inclined and able to rent their property. 1. Was the decision of the court fair? Why or why not? 2. If you were the owner of the cement plant, what will you do to solve the problem? 3. Discuss the cost and benefit of the case from the perspective of the principle of utilitarianism.
Case Analysis 1. in 1982, XYZ cement company began its plant operation in Pampanga. Local residents were very happy because of the economic benefits they got from the plant especially the 400 local residents employed. After a few years of operation, Local Residents noticed the constant vibration and loud noise coming from the plant. Local residents filed a suit against the company asking the court to issue an injunction to close the plant. The residents claimed that the loud noise and the vibrations posed dangers to their health and damaged their property. The company was using the best available technology in their operation. The court refused to issue the injunction arguing that closing the plant would mean more harm than good to both parties. The court instead ruled that the company should pay the residents a one-time fee to compensate them for the damages done. The amount was computed based on the fair market price residents would receive if they were inclined and able to rent their property. 1. Was the decision of the court fair? Why or why not? 2. If you were the owner of the cement plant, what will you do to solve the problem? 3. Discuss the cost and benefit of the case from the perspective of the principle of utilitarianism.
Essentials Of Investments
11th Edition
ISBN:9781260013924
Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Chapter1: Investments: Background And Issues
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1PS
Related questions
Question
Case Analysis 1.
in 1982, XYZ cement company began its plant operation in Pampanga. Local residents were very happy because of the economic benefits they got from the plant especially the 400 local residents employed. After a few years of operation, Local Residents noticed the constant vibration and loud noise coming from the plant.
Local residents filed a suit against the company asking the court to issue an injunction to close the plant. The residents claimed that the loud noise and the vibrations posed dangers to their health and damaged their property.
The company was using the best available technology in their operation. The court refused to issue the injunction arguing that closing the plant would mean more harm than good to both parties. The court instead ruled that the company should pay the residents a one-time fee to compensate them for the damages done. The amount was computed based on the fair market price residents would receive if they were inclined and able to rent their property.
1. Was the decision of the court fair? Why or why not?
2. If you were the owner of the cement plant, what will you do to solve the problem?
3. Discuss the cost and benefit of the case from the perspective of the principle of utilitarianism.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, finance and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Essentials Of Investments
Finance
ISBN:
9781260013924
Author:
Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:
Mcgraw-hill Education,
Essentials Of Investments
Finance
ISBN:
9781260013924
Author:
Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:
Mcgraw-hill Education,
Foundations Of Finance
Finance
ISBN:
9780134897264
Author:
KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. William
Publisher:
Pearson,
Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou…
Finance
ISBN:
9781337395250
Author:
Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i…
Finance
ISBN:
9780077861759
Author:
Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan Professor
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education