c.ass. Sup- 2. Consider the following sequential variant of the public goods game w pose that there are 2 consumers, 1 and 2. First consumer 1 chooses a quantity ₁ ≥ 0 to provide of the public good. After observing 1's choice, 2 chooses a quantity 2 ≥ 0 to provide. When the price of the public good is p, 1's payoff is u₁(1, 2) = a√√x₁ + x₂-p²₁ where a > 0 and 2's payoff is u₂(x₁, x2) = √√x1 + x2 − px2. (a) Suppose that a = 1. Show that this game has a Nash equilibrium in which 1 contributes a positive amount. Solution: There are many such Nash equilibria. One is for 1 to contribute and for 2 to contribute 0 regardless of how much 1 contributes.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question

PLEASE TEACH THIS

Cass. Sup-
2. Consider the following sequential variant of the public goods game w
pose that there are 2 consumers, 1 and 2. First consumer 1 chooses a quantity ₁ ≥ 0 to
provide of the public good. After observing 1's choice, 2 chooses a quantity 2 ≥ 0 to provide.
When the price of the public good is p, 1's payoff is u₁(₁, 2) = a√x₁ + x₂-p²₁ where a > 0
and 2's payoff is u2(x1, x2) = √√T1+T2 — px2.
(a) Suppose that a = 1. Show that this game has a Nash equilibrium in which 1 contributes
a positive amount.
Solution: There are many such Nash equilibria. One is for 1 to contribute and for
2 to contribute 0 regardless of how much 1 contributes.
(b) Find all subgame perfect equilibria of this game for each (positive) value of a and p.
Solution: Use backward induction. If 1 contributes ₁, then 2's optimal action is to con-
tribute (1) max 7-2₁,0}. Given this strategy for 2, 1's payoff to contributing
₁ is
- px1
a√₁-pr
This payoff is maximized by choosing r1=0 if a < 2, x₁ = 0 or ₁ = 1/p² if a = 2, and
x₁ = if a > 2. Therefore, the subgame perfect equilibria are as follows:
if 1 ≤²
otherwise.
u(x₁, x₂(x₁)) =
i. If a < 2, there is a unique SPE given by x₁ = 0 and x2(x₁) = max.
{+ -21,0}.
ii. If a = 2, there are two SPE, one given by x₁ = 0 and x₂(x₁) = max {-₁,0},
{-1,0}.
I
the other given by x₁ = 1/p² and x₂(x₁) = max
iii. If a > 2, there is a unique SPE given by x₁ = and x₂(x₁) = max c{₁-2₁,0}.
(c) How does the total public good provision in part (b) compare to the Nash equilibrium
provision when the consumers choose simultaneously?
Solution: From class, total public good provision in the Nash equilibrium of the simul-
taneous game is
if a >1. In the sequential game, total provision is
if a > 2. Total provision is never higher in the
if a ≤ 1 and
ifa <2, or if a = 2, and
sequential game, and is strictly lower if 1 < a < 2.
Transcribed Image Text:Cass. Sup- 2. Consider the following sequential variant of the public goods game w pose that there are 2 consumers, 1 and 2. First consumer 1 chooses a quantity ₁ ≥ 0 to provide of the public good. After observing 1's choice, 2 chooses a quantity 2 ≥ 0 to provide. When the price of the public good is p, 1's payoff is u₁(₁, 2) = a√x₁ + x₂-p²₁ where a > 0 and 2's payoff is u2(x1, x2) = √√T1+T2 — px2. (a) Suppose that a = 1. Show that this game has a Nash equilibrium in which 1 contributes a positive amount. Solution: There are many such Nash equilibria. One is for 1 to contribute and for 2 to contribute 0 regardless of how much 1 contributes. (b) Find all subgame perfect equilibria of this game for each (positive) value of a and p. Solution: Use backward induction. If 1 contributes ₁, then 2's optimal action is to con- tribute (1) max 7-2₁,0}. Given this strategy for 2, 1's payoff to contributing ₁ is - px1 a√₁-pr This payoff is maximized by choosing r1=0 if a < 2, x₁ = 0 or ₁ = 1/p² if a = 2, and x₁ = if a > 2. Therefore, the subgame perfect equilibria are as follows: if 1 ≤² otherwise. u(x₁, x₂(x₁)) = i. If a < 2, there is a unique SPE given by x₁ = 0 and x2(x₁) = max. {+ -21,0}. ii. If a = 2, there are two SPE, one given by x₁ = 0 and x₂(x₁) = max {-₁,0}, {-1,0}. I the other given by x₁ = 1/p² and x₂(x₁) = max iii. If a > 2, there is a unique SPE given by x₁ = and x₂(x₁) = max c{₁-2₁,0}. (c) How does the total public good provision in part (b) compare to the Nash equilibrium provision when the consumers choose simultaneously? Solution: From class, total public good provision in the Nash equilibrium of the simul- taneous game is if a >1. In the sequential game, total provision is if a > 2. Total provision is never higher in the if a ≤ 1 and ifa <2, or if a = 2, and sequential game, and is strictly lower if 1 < a < 2.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Ultimatum Game
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education