(c) Like any other wave function, a coherent state can be expanded in terms of energy eigenstates: la) = [c₁|n). 11=0 Show that the expansion coefficients are a" √n! Cn Co- (d) Determine co by normalizing la). Answer: exp(-la|²/2). (e) Now put in the time dependence: In) → e-i Ent/hIn). and show that la(1)) remains an eigenstate of a_, but the eigenvalue evolves in time: a(t) = e-ita. α. So a coherent state stays coherent, and continues to minimize the uncertainty product. (f) Is the ground state (n = 0)) itself a coherent state? If so, what is the eigen- value?

icon
Related questions
Question
Question d) e) f)
3. Griffiths 3.35
***Problem 3.35 Coherent states of the harmonic oscillator. Among the stationary
states of the harmonic oscillator (\n) = Yn(x), Equation 2.67) only n= 0 hits the
uncertainty limit (ơx0p = ħ/2); in general, ơxop = (2n + 1)h/2, as you found
in Problem 2.12. But certain linear combinations (known as coherent states) also
minimize the uncertainty product. They are (as it turns out) eigenfunctions of the
lowering operator:32
a_la) = a|a)
(the eigenvalue a can be any complex number).
(a) Calculate (x), (x²), (p), (p²) in the state |æ). Hint: Use the technique in
Example 2.5, and remember that a4 is the hermitian conjugate of a-. Do not
assume a is real.
(b) Find ox and
Opi
show that
OxOp
= h/2.
(c) Like any other wave function, a coherent state can be expanded in terms of
energy eigenstates:
00
la) = Gulm).
%3D
n=0
Show that the expansion coefficients are
a"
Co.
Jn!
(d) Determine co by normalizing |æ). Answer: exp(-|a|²/2).
(e) Now put in the time dependence:
In) → e-i Ent/h \n),
and show that |(t)) remains an eigenstate of a-, but the eigenvalue evolves
in time:
a (1) = e¬iw!«.
So a coherent state stays coherent, and continues to minimize the uncertainty
product.
(f) Is the ground state (|n = 0)) itself a coherent state? If so, what is the eigen-
value?
Transcribed Image Text:3. Griffiths 3.35 ***Problem 3.35 Coherent states of the harmonic oscillator. Among the stationary states of the harmonic oscillator (\n) = Yn(x), Equation 2.67) only n= 0 hits the uncertainty limit (ơx0p = ħ/2); in general, ơxop = (2n + 1)h/2, as you found in Problem 2.12. But certain linear combinations (known as coherent states) also minimize the uncertainty product. They are (as it turns out) eigenfunctions of the lowering operator:32 a_la) = a|a) (the eigenvalue a can be any complex number). (a) Calculate (x), (x²), (p), (p²) in the state |æ). Hint: Use the technique in Example 2.5, and remember that a4 is the hermitian conjugate of a-. Do not assume a is real. (b) Find ox and Opi show that OxOp = h/2. (c) Like any other wave function, a coherent state can be expanded in terms of energy eigenstates: 00 la) = Gulm). %3D n=0 Show that the expansion coefficients are a" Co. Jn! (d) Determine co by normalizing |æ). Answer: exp(-|a|²/2). (e) Now put in the time dependence: In) → e-i Ent/h \n), and show that |(t)) remains an eigenstate of a-, but the eigenvalue evolves in time: a (1) = e¬iw!«. So a coherent state stays coherent, and continues to minimize the uncertainty product. (f) Is the ground state (|n = 0)) itself a coherent state? If so, what is the eigen- value?
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer